Preview

Crt 205 Deductive Reasoning

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
400 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Crt 205 Deductive Reasoning
The important part of knowing and understanding the facts before making a decision is to make the right decision with the information that you already know. Without this, you can easily make a rash decision that could have consequences you did not think of before. For example in the third argument Mark was looking at a new Jeep as it would let him get his dream car and have room for a new baby. One factor to consider however; is if they plan on having more than one kid in the future. If they decide to have more kids then they will easily run out of room in a Jeep and they would be in the same predicament as they are currently in. Looking at the fifth argument Jenna is in a situation where she can cheat to keep up with her schooling or try to complete all of her work on her own. It is important for her to know that cheating could get her removed from school and possibly loose financial aid money if she has applied for any. It is important for her to weigh these options before considering taking the low road and using other peoples work to aid her.
The role of deductive reasoning is to take general statements or premises to reach a decision. For the fifth argument Jenna takes her friends experience into consideration when looking to cheat or not to with her class. She is going off of a general discussion with her friend and not looking further into it. This is deductive reasoning as she is not using any numbers or facts to support the argument.
The process of deductive reasoning helps one understand an argument by putting the argument into normal terms that many people can understand or reason with. Without the use of facts or statistics it is easy to follow ones on opinion or a paraphrase of what the facts are without them being clearly stated. This is shown in argument three I believe. The argument shows that advantages of owning a home but making changes to one’s house is not always possible if you live in an area where the HOA controls what decorations or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Chapter 6 Logic

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Select the correct answer for each question. All questions are worth 4 points a piece.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Since Jessica’s participation in local politics increased significantly after she joined her school’s political science club, it is clear that her involvement in that club led her to take an interest in politics. The argument above is flawed because…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to our text, Deductive reasoning takes all of the given essentials and uses them and nothing else to structure a conclusion. Deduction is a form of argument that purports to be conclusive. The theory is what concludes to the…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Answer: first of all is the lack of his economy problem; he rather buys the jacket on the street than in the store, because he thought he never got the good deals in stores. He didn’t fully pay the man who had sold him the blue down jacket; he decided to pay him later when he had the money, then he bet with the guy Julio $20 who wants him to stand outside in the middle of the parking lot for 20 minutes while it was raining if he could make it. He’d also be the first person in all the generations of his family to graduate. Ms Johnson knew that every day he was tempted to drop out and find a job to help support his large family. She also knew that he wanted an education. He decided to make something…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pt1420 Assignment 1

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What reasoning is used? Is it inductive or deductive? The reason being used in this article appeared to be inductive reasoning, because the author started by the Facebook problem into the issue of identity free use through the workplace and communication services.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Crimes against Logic, written by James Whyte, presents a variety of arguments and information pertaining to different styles of writing. He presents ideas with a witty yet dry sense of humor, while also presenting good cases with his arguments. For example, in chapter five, titled “Shut Up”. At first the argument as a whole seems a bit extreme but it becomes more valid throughout. Whyte provides an example in the beginning of the chapter. That shows how easily his argument of shutting up can be proven. The example explains that if someone makes a ridiculous enough argument that the person with whom you are arguing with will simply stay quiet. Which in Whyte’s eyes means that the person who made the ridiculous argument is automatically right. This is just one of the ways that Whyte breaks down the idea of “shutting up” as a form of refuting an argument.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The memorandum from Salvador Monella to the Board of Directors addresses the rising costs of employee healthcare benefits at Penn-Mart. His communication includes an explanation of his purpose in addressing the healthcare costs, findings regarding Penn-Mart’s benefits costs, a recommended program to implement for cost reduction, and a discussion containing support for their recommendation. While some business people may be tempted to simply accept the information presented in Mr. Monella’s memorandum, it is my opinion, after reading Browne and Keeley’s Asking the Right Questions (2012), that adopting a critical thinking approach is the most effective way to evaluate the document.…

    • 2048 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Logical argument is a form of reasoning that attempts to establish the truth of one claim based on the assumed truth of the evidence in other claims provided to support a conclusion. It is different from a claim or a statement because it is more then one statement or idea therefor calling for more claims, or statements.…

    • 591 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each religion has many different views on life. For example Buddhism teaches us that life brings on constant changes and someone can always find a way to make him or herself or a situation better. It shows to view everything in a positive way rather than negative. Hinduism is one of the largest religion practiced today, though unlike Buddhism and Taoism, Hinduism believe in multiple God and each God teaches a different view. Hinduism believes in reincarnation, which is why they don’t kill cows or elephants. Taoism out of all 3 is the smallest religion and is a Chinese religion that practice living life with pure harmony leaving anything negative out. Which I honestly think is something that is very similar between all three, they all believe…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Buddhist worldview is unique in retrospect that they do not worship any gods nor God. They are looking for enlightenment to reach the state of Nirvana. In regard to the origin of Buddhism they believe there is no beginning nor end. It was founded by Siddhartha Gautama (Buddha) during the sixth century in Northern India. After he encountered all four kinds of suffering: old age, sickness, death, and poverty Siddhartha became disillusioned and deeply concerned with suffering.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    5. Destiny - In the Buddhist Worldview, our destiny is not controlled by God but, by us. Actions we take and decisions we make determine if we have good or bad karma. When we go through the cycle of reincarnation, it is karma that determines who we become when we are reborn.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analyzing the syllogisms

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This syllogism is deductive. This is deductive because the conclusion is true based on premises that are true or accepted as true. This is deductively valid because all true premises led to a true conclusion. Premises: All college students attend class and Cindy attends class. Conclusion: Therefore, Cindy is a college student.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Often times lines become blurred regarding inductions and deductive reasoning as they apply to forensic sciences. Inductions are described by Thornton (1997b, p. 13) as an inference that is derived by specific observations to a generalization, or an assumption that may not always be valid. On the other hand, a deductive reasoning is defined as a forensics-evidence-based, process-oriented method of investigative reasoning based off of the behavioral patterns of a particular offender (Turvey, 1999). Historically, forensic scientists have failed to recognize the importance of inductions and deductive reasoning as a critical process in conducting investigations. Thus resulting in a hypothesis being falsely categorized as a deductive conclusion; when in fact it remains nothing more than a statement until supported by follow on testing (Thornton & Kirk, 1997).…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Abortion should be legal, because there are too many things that go wrong. A women could be raped and need to get one because she doesn’t want to look at the child and doesn’t want to feel it grow, freedom of choosing what to do and how government involvement in personal decisions such as this could lead to potentially having the government deem how many children you can have or even how many pregnancies you are allowed, medical reasons for abortion, and the ability of a woman to have control of her body is critical to civil rights.…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Deductive Arguments: A deductive argument isn’t necessarily valid, it could be invalid. It also isn’t necessarily sound – it could be unsound. If the argument is valid and the premises are true then overall the argument is sound. You will always gain knowledge with a deductive argument. The first premise will link with the second premise in order to make a conclusion. Deductive arguments aren’t based on assumptions.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays