Several people have been arguing on whether cursive should be a subject taught to young students. This topic has been researched and discussed for several years. Schools should allow cursive to be taught to help kids benefit their brain, read documents, and sign their signature. One reason, is that cursive is needed for signing signatures because everyone has their own personal signature. Another reason, is that kids need to be able to read historical documents and handwritten letters that are in cursive. Lastly, learning cursive is said to be beneficial for the brain. All in all, cursive should be taught in …show more content…
Some people believe that cursive is important to learn for use in the future, while others believe that it is a waste of time and is not going to be used. Schools should teach cursive, so kids brain’s can benefit, and they can read important documents. Also, kids can learn to write their signatures so they can use it later in life. Cursive is more beneficial than a “waste of time.” First of all, it improves kids fine motor skills. This is important for many everyday activities. Additionally, kids can read important documents, or letters. If students didn’t learn cursive, they also wouldn’t be able to read it very well. Moreover, kids can learn to write their signatures for later in life. This will ensure that kids will be ready to sign bills and contracts when they are adults. In closing, I think that schools should teach young students to write in cursive, so their brains can benefit, they can use their signature, and so they can read important documents and