This device is more advanced than the radio frequency device. This device has been used since 1997. The device can be worn on the ankle or wrist but the offender has to carry the transmitter. This device uses the cell phone to transmit the signal to the monitoring center. The signal uses a global positioning satellite, which tracks the offender’s movement throughout the community. This technology allows probation officers to review the offender’s whereabouts as well as shows if the offenders enter a certain restricted area (OPPAGA, 2005, p.…
Recent and future trends have always and will always affect the criminal justice system. New trends in technology, law, terrorism, gender and diversity will always effect the functions of the criminal justice system. Technology in the 21st century is one of the legal issues that have caused controversy. New technology devices such as hand geometry biometrics and the use of retina and iris devices have the ability to gain information not only on people’s health but also their medical history as well. When it concerns the criminal justice system, many of these new technology devices are being used to detect drugs and concealed weapons that are sneaked into prison facilities. They help prevent illegal activities in the prison. In Australia, the correction system there uses the smart card technology which provides them with better security, efficiency and flexibility. The smart card allows assets to tracking inmates, staff monitoring, visitor tracking, and telemedicine (govtech.com). The smart card also controls the temperature and humidity in the prison facility, allowing for their comprehensive responsibilities to be managed. Due to overcrowding in correctional facilities since 1997, this technology is…
Angela Kelley’s article “Excuse Me, But Your House is Leaking,” discusses the new technologies of Thermal Imaging Devices (TIDs) and how they are impacting our Fourth Amendment right that protects us against invasion of privacy. The use of TIDs improperly opens the door to unreasonable searches and seizures. Because of the nature of the intrusion, TIDs somehow fall outside the letter of the law. However, do they fall outside the spirit in which the laws were originally crafted? This paper will react to this point.…
This paper presents the topic selected for the final Public Safety Case Analysis Project, an overview of the USA Patriot Act, its impact on local law enforcement, and the potential for net widening. Congress reacted to the violation to our country on September 11, 2001 by passing the USA Patriot Act into law on October 26, 2001. (USA Patriot Act, 2001). Since its enactment, the USA Patriot Act has both validated and victimized the American public in the name of securing our Nations freedom.…
As technology experimented with ideals such as wireless connection, it gave way to many unethical and at times illegal practices. Ethical issues that the Electronic Communications Privacy Act had to address included accessibility and privacy; information could be shared outside the confinement of a person’s home or business. The government needed to find a way that would control and guard how this information was access, collected and stored. Implementing the Electronic Communications Privacy Act allowed government officials to include devices outside the scope of the Federal Wiretap Statute.…
There was a device used that if otherwise not used would not be able to detect the use of any illegal doing in the privacy of the home. This makes the search warrant unreasonable being that it was obtained using measures that could not be openly available. This takes away from the privacy of the person’s home if the government uses devices to spy into the person’s personal home use. This case brings up the question “What limits there are upon this power of technology to shrink the realm of guaranteed privacy.” We think that obtaining by sense-enhancing technology any information regarding the interior of the home that could not otherwise have been obtained without physical intrusion into a constitutionally protected area. This assures preservation of that degree of privacy against government that existed when the Fourth Amendment was adopted.…
The Criminal Justice system in the United States date back to colonial days when the citizens were subject to the laws and rules of the British. Many times the laws and subsequent punishment were not always fair and just](para. 1). Policing and technology has a lot to do with these changes. The criminal justice system has changed somewhat for the worst, but mostly for the better. Nevertheless, the goal and urgency of protecting the community and it’s citizens has not changed, but has only gotten stronger to fulfill. Technology will only cause improvements with the fight to deter crime. As crime increases, so will technology. As technology increases, so will crime. Advancements of technology will also change policing as well. Laws will become more strict, making it harder for criminals to fight…
Techno corrections are currently a trending topic as well as a growing practice. There are a few different examples of techno corrections such as all-in-one drug detection spray, ground- penetrating radar, heartbeat monitoring, and personal alarm location system. However there are other more familiar practices such as electronic tracking and location systems. This tracking can be done either with the common bracelets, which are based off of cellular and satellite tracking. Some of these methods, especially electronic tracking are said to be intrusive on the privacy of the inmates. This raises the questions of inmate’s privacy versus security. Some individuals may argue that even though inmates have broken the law and have forgone the rights…
Over time, technology has impacted the police and other law enforcement agencies with new devices for gathering evidence. These new tools have caused constitutional questions to surface. One particular case in Oregon of an individual (DLK) aroused such question. DLK was suspected of growing marijuana inside of his home. Agents used a thermal imager to scan DLK’s residence form the outside. The results indicated heat, just like the kind that is generated by special lights used for growing marijuana indoors. Constructed by the scan, a judge issued a search warrant. A warrant – a legal paper authorizing a search – cannot be issued unless there is a cause, and a probable cause must be sworn to by the police officer or prosecutor and approved by a judge. A warrant must describe what is being searched and what will be seized. 100 marijuana plants were found finalizing the arrest of DLK; however, did the scan violate DLK’s Fourth Amendment rights? The Fourth Amendment states, “The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall be issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (Constitution). This amendment touches on the expectation of privacy in your home and person. The government is not unable to search you, your home, your belongings, or take your belongings, also known as a seizure, without a good reason. A person’s Fourth Amendment rights may at times seem to delay the world of law enforcement. If the police feel that they have…
Ronald Bailey’s article seeks to explore more than just cell phone tracking technology. He delves in to the ideas surrounding the tracking of individuals both from a historical context and from people who are involved with the cell phone tracking issue today. Those sources are from both the government and private sector and each offers personal insights that might allow us to more thoughtfully determine which is more important, privacy or the prosecution of criminals.…
These devices have been successfully used by numerous law enforcement and civilian agencies since 1993 as another means to gain compliance, and oftentimes in civilian use, quell attacks by suspects attacking their victims.…
The creation of chat rooms like my-space, face-book, cell phones, and other personal messaging services has created ethical issues and opportunity for criminals to commit crimes. “Since the wide spread use of computers and the Internet have entered the mainstream of American life. Millions of Americans spend hours every day using computers and mobile devices to send and receive email, surf the Internet, maintain databases, and participate in countless other activities,” (Office of Legal Education Executive Office for United States Attorneys, 2009). The creation and widespread use of social networks have led to ethical problems of protecting the rights citizens and law enforcement agencies. Even though we want law enforcement agents and the government to capture criminals, we want to protect the rights of law abiding citizens. “The Electronic Communications Privacy Act and the Stored Wire Electronic Communications Act are commonly referred together as the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 (ECPA).” (Justice Information Sharing , US. Department of Justice, 2012). “ The onset of computer and other digital and electronic communications prompted the need to make updates to the ACT.” (Justice, 2012) The USA PATRIOT Act and subsequent federal enactments have clarified and updated the ECPA in light of the ongoing development of modern communications technologies and methods, including easing restrictions on law enforcement access to stored communications in some cases. (Justice Information Sharing U.S. Department Of Justice, 2012). “The Electronic Communications Privacy Act (“ECPA”) was passed in 1986 to expand and revise federal wiretapping and electronic eavesdropping provisions. It was envisioned to create “a fair balance between the privacy expectations of citizens and the legitimate needs of law enforcement.” Epic.org. (2010). The advances in social networking and telephone communications brought the…
Is technology testing the Fourth Amendment? With all the new technology, police are now using devices that could potentially “see through walls”. They are also using other search techniques such as wiretapping to conduct searches rather than a “physical search” and by doing so; they can “legally” avoid violating the Fourth Amendment. A lot of the Fourth Amendment has also been weakened significantly over the years from Federal Court Case and the new technology.…
Everyday technology is taking advances in all fields of work forces, Especially Law Enforcement. Todays as well as future technology will make the jobs of those in the military and law enforcement easier as well as safer. As technology is breaking through, amendments 4 and 8 in the constitution need to be taken in consideration. The technologies may not be used to punish, and if it is searching equipment, a warrant is needed unless it will be used for sudden reasons of safety.…
Of course there is a downfall of the GPS tracking system. Prisoners when released are issued a GPS ankle bracelet similar to a house arrest bracelet can cut the bracelet off when they are not physically being watched. When parolees’ deactivate the bracelet, officers respond and find the bracelet cut and the parolee is nowhere to be found. Of course the only way of capturing the parolee is if he/she commits another crime or is pulled over for a routine traffic stop. Now the U.S. Supreme Court for the first time limited police power to track people using GPS devices, ruling in a case that will shape the privacy rights Americans should expect from a new generation of wireless electronics. Today’s decision addresses the…