DNA Profiling Argument Essay

Many people believe that DNA profiling is not a credible source. Although 99.9 percent of human DNA is the same in everyone, the remaining 0.1 percent which consists of about 3 million base pairs of amino acids is unique to that individual (Ballaro and Walter). Without the help of scientists and their technology many criminals would get away with their crimes. Deoxyribonucleic acid, or DNA, is a component of every cell in the human body. DNA can be found in any organic source for example saliva, blood, semen, and even hair or skin cells. The use of DNA to settle a crime case, started in 1988 with the conviction of Colin Pitchfork for the rape and murder of two young girls in England (Driscoll and Newton). Although some people that have been innocent charged with crimes the most reliable source is still DNA profiling. The FBI’s DNA profiling program has a goal to standardize methodology among all US laboratories. Forensic sampling is getting new advanced technology to enhance the accuracy of DNA testing (Driscoll and Newton). There is concern that DNA profiling poses a threat to individual privacy rights (Ballaro and Walter). DNA profiling is not harming anyone’s rights it’s protecting the community by putting the correct criminals away. DNA evidence is huge when it comes to jury trials. It gives, what most
people believe undeniable evidence to convict a person (Pros and Cons of DNA Fingerprinting ).
Stefan Kiszko served 16 years for the murder of Lesley Molseed but later was released when sperm samples were found on the little girl’s clothing did not belong to him because he was infertile.
The Yorkshire Police department reopened the case in 1999 and matched the DNA profile to Ronald Castree. He Was later convicted and sent to jail for 30 years in 2007 ( Sean Hodgson ). If the process of DNA profiling was not used in this case then Stefan Kiszko would not have been able to prove his innocence and Ronald Castree would have gotten away and committed even more crimes. DNA profiling allows for the victims family to know that the right person is put
away.
DNA evidence was considered tampered with in the Oj Simpson case. Samples from the bloody gloves that he used to kill his wife and her friend were a genetic match without a doubt. Jurors were pounded with expert testimony procedures and distract with racism and accusations of evidence planting that all the DNA evidence was forgotten about ( Team ). Now that people have heard about what Oj Simpson did and how he got away with it shows that since the DNA evidence was the only way to prove that he was guilty.
The belief that DNA profiling doesn't help solve cases is still out in this world but with the processes of having the technology to even be able to help solve crimes is mind blowing. If every case was said to have been solved by DNA profiling there would be no criminals. Sometimes the cases get pushed back and everyone forgets about that one simple process. DNA profiling.