Dan Bakers Argument

The Dan Bakers argument that rape could be moral it brings up an interesting point of view. Personally, I don’t know where I would stand on the argument. The idea of morally justifying rape is interesting in the way that they put it in the hypothetical instance. The idea of make a person go rape another person in order so the save all of humanity pushed the normality thinking of doing an extreme task for the greater good. When it comes to Dan Barkers argument it makes scenes for a person cause harm to one in order to save all, yes. Would we be okay with the action is more morally personal, but the idea of sacrificing one in order to save many I would think would be common thinking? It like with the idea of the runaway trolley and take one life