To any dancer, this has most likely happened numerous times, not to mention the occasional interruption of conversations in the school halls to say dance isn’t a sport.
“I mean, it doesn’t it doesn’t even use a ball, so it can’t be a sport, right?”
“It’s not even similar to other sports, so it can’t be one.” But, it is. By definition, actually. I believe dance is a sport because it meets the definition of a sport, and has lots of similar qualities to other ‘typical’ sports (such as basketball or baseball).
sport
/spôrt/
noun an activity involving physical exertion and skill in which an …show more content…
Yes. According to my, and many others, most trustworthy source -- Google. Now, this alone could never make any type of argument, without an explanation.
Start by breaking down the definition: ‘an activity involving physical exertion. . .’ Now in English: an activity that takes effort, or work. Speaking with first-hand experience, dance is not a sport for the weak. And you can take my word for that. Kick lines, turns, toe-touches and firebirds, though us dancers may make them look easy, are not.
To continue on with the definition: ‘. . . and skill . . .’ this one hardly needs to be debated on. How many non-dancers do you know that can do 4 turns in a row, or slide down in the splits at any time of the day, or even do a proper kick line. I’m betting your answer is not many, which only proves dancers need and have certain skills.
The last part of the trusty, Google definition is: ‘in which an individual or team competes against another or others for entertainment.’ Duh. That’s the reason dancers have to go to class, just like a basketball player would go to practice. You have to be ready when you compete, which, in case you were unaware, we do. Dancers are known to be competitive, you