Preview

Dbq Essay on Han and Roman Technological Advancements

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
855 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dbq Essay on Han and Roman Technological Advancements
The Han and Roman empires have their fair share of technological advancements, how each civilization reacts to them is different however. Since the beginning of time we as humans have always needed to advance but not every human being believed so. In the Han and Roman empires, as in many others, the attitudes towards these kinds of advancements were mostly positive but there were some negative outlooks. In the Han dynasty many of the advancements were dedicated towards water and flooding. In document 1, a Han government official clearly agrees that new flood prevention techniques must be created and people who are able to carry out the repairs should be appointed to oversee the production of these flood preventing walls. Huan Tan, a upper-class philosopher, has a positive outlook on agricultural advancements because of Emperor Fuxi. He believes that instead of using human body strength to plow fields, the use of animals such as oxen, and horses should be used in replace so more work could be accomplished. In the pages of a government-sponsored history of Han China, the attitudes towards technology are, again, towards agricultural improvements. A governor by the name of Tu Shih invented a “water-powered blowing-engine” for the casting of iron agricultural equipment so that people could receive a great benefit for a small amount of labor. Since the people writing the documents are upper-classmen and involved in the government, some of these opinions and outlooks may be biased because they may have been taught to say such positive things about the advancements so that all of the people may support the government and use these ideas that were newly invented. Now in the Roman Empire, the advancements made were not water or agricultural related, they were advancements in tools and crafts. Cicero, an upper-class political leader, believed that the invention of tools had a great impact on the dignity of men. In Rome, men were held to a certain degree of gentlemen

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Around times ranging from the first century B.C.E all the way to the first century C.E. two large cultures with slightly differing opinions pertaining to technology were those of Han China and Rome. While Rome, a civilization set upon expansion and conquest; saw little need for adaptive technology lest it aided in the plundering lifestyle Rome’s economy was based upon, Han China was much more tolerant towards advancements in technology even as they preferred a more traditional lifestyle. The two main branches of technology presented through the documents include: Technology introduced by governing bodies/officials, and technology innovated by the common consumer.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty were two very large empires. Both of these empires were considered golden ages in one form or another. Han was considered a Golden Age in general because of its length and prosperity, while Rome also promoted prosperity it was mainly the Golden Age of Latin Literature. These empires were similar technologically while different politically.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Between 1000BCE and 600CE the technological achievements of the Han and Roman Empires greatly excelled creating an outlook of the concepts we have today. Han China as well as Rome both had great construction, where new roads were being built and advanced in the production of newly arrived iron used for tools and weaponry; however, while Han China used iron to open more land clearing the forest as well as to conquer new territories, Rome used their less impressively made iron tools and weapons to expand the empire. Also, although both empires successfully built roads, Rome’s focus leaned toward luxury while the Hans did not take their surroundings for granted therefore building what was simply needed.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire were very common in the aspect of their downfall and collapse. Han China had a well-organized bureaucracy based upon Confucian ideas and education. In addition, they also had emphasis on family ancestors (patriarchal), reliance on landed gentry, and accomplishments in engineering; which includes roads, canals, and the Great Wall. The Roman Empire contained a well-organized bureaucracy as well which was founded on Roman law and classical learning. They also implied emphasis on family (pater familias), had reliance on patricians, and had engineering accomplishments; including roads, aqueducts, amphitheaters, domes, sewage systems, and central heating. Although, unfortunately the two become even more common…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Han and the Romans both had very passive views when it came to technology, both sharing the "good is good enough" mindset. This appears through people of high class wanting higher quality materials and laborers, the Han enjoying a superb invention but not outwardly seeking to improve it, as well as the Romans appreciated fantastic inventions without searching for ways to improve…

    • 64 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome and Han China had both similar and different characteristics about their empires, while existing at the same time. While thousands of miles separated Rome and Han China, neither influenced the other. They both lasted approximately 400 years, with populations of about 50 million. The Roman Empire encompassed all the land that surrounded the Mediterranean Sea, as well as large portions of Continental Europe and the Middle East. The Han Empire however, stretched from the Pacific ocean to the oases of Central Asia.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han dynasty and Roman Empire demonstrated many different attitudes and reaction as new technological advancements emerged and diffused thought the empire. The romans sought out that tradition was necessary to incorporate and implement into their works, which involved much more workload. On the other hand the Han accepted of most new advancements, as it benefited and contributed toward their social and economic status, that develop rapidly…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hans and the Romans Dbq

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Hans and the Romans both had very fascinating views on their technology. While The Han’s attitude toward technology was viewed as a positive contribution to their society the Romans had positive views other Romans had negative attitudes. Every document has its own opinions on the way they appreciate technology some support which is making then look good, while some think it’s for low class people and not for government. In order to fully analyze Han and Roman attitudes toward technology it would have been helpful to have an additional document of an interview with a Roman laborer because all of the other documents were from higher class Romans who did not work with tools and such technology.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Romans in favor of technology praised it for its beauty and usefulness. Hans in favor of…

    • 779 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han dynasty was the most influential dynasty in Chinese history and led to china becoming a country as we know it today. They extended Chinese rule from southern Mongolia to northern Vietnam and as far west as Nepal. One of the main reason for the prosperity and solidity of the Han dynasty was the relationship between the imperial family and the elite. Each group supported each other economically as well as socially, leading to a stable and prosperous empire.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Han and the Romans were ahead of the game when it came to technology. However, they both had very different attitudes towards the subject. The Han were determined to get ahead and they were supportive of others who made advances within the empire, whereas the Romans, although determined to get ahead, were arrogant and judgmental of each other’s work.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Keep in mind before that all these documents are written by upper Roman officials and leaders, therefore losing the voice of the lower classes and how they felt about technology. In document 5, it shows a negative attitude towards technology and says that the craftsmen’s occupations are vulgar and unbecoming. In document 6, it talks about how a Roman political leader in the second-century B.C.E and how he was anxious about road building, and paying attention to detail, and the person who wrote the passage was a high official from the first century C.E. In document 7, an upper-class Roman philosopher talks about how he doesn’t care about what inventions came first and that they were invented by people with a nimble and sharp mind, but not great or elevated, showing how they thought that using technology was beneath…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han and Roman Empires are highly praised with great wealth, inventions, and their success.While both societies saw new technological advancements as necessary, the Han dynasty always sought the most efficient route, the romans prioritized speed and was not very fond of craftsmanship.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roman Technology Dbq

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Han Guan (document 2) a government official is describing the bad conditions of technology due to the quantity of the workers and the quality of labor. He also says that the lack of using technology causes an increase in the iron and salt prices, causing the lack of seasoning for other countries and the insufficiency of strong tools for farming, building, etc. As Seneca , a Roman philosopher said that "I do not believe that tools for the crafts were invented by wise men. The question of whether the hammer or the tongs came first does not seem important to me. Both were invented by someone with a mind that was nimble and sharp, but not great or elevated" and Cicero (document 5), an upper class roman political said "Vulgar and unbecoming to a gentleman are all the jobs hired workers take on, whose labor is purchased rather than their skill. All craftsmen spend their time in vulgar occupations; no workshop can have anything enlightening about it." This clearly show that these two Roman upper class man were against technology because they believed that inventors and craftsmen have a lack of wisdom and enlightenment. Lastly, Document 6 shows Plutarch, a high government official, writing about how Gaius Gracchus created roads that helped the mobility of horses without requiring a groom to help.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han dynasty saw a lot of positive and negative things about Qin dynasty. Some of the positive things about Qin dynasty is that the bureacracy was being domoinated by noble families again. The Qin was selected purely based on merits. But what was going on in Qin dynasty was not the same in Han dynasty. Even though in this situation Han dynasty attempted to reform the situation that remained unchanged with the exception of some troubles, until the Tang Dynasty. One of the main serious changes in Han dynasty was the designation of Confucism at the primary state philosophy. Due to the political problems the Han emperors felt…

    • 876 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays