Empire’s philosophers saw it as distasteful and their government officials saw it as beautiful.
Romans in favor of technology praised it for its beauty and usefulness. Hans in favor of technology praised it for its efficiency and protection. However, there were members of both
Han China and the Roman Empire who disliked technology because it could monopolize industries and its users were seen as dull and unskilled.
Romans that had a positive attitude towards technology were very passionate about it.
Not only were roads appreciated for their usefulness but they were described as having grace and beauty (Doc 6). Roads were not the only things that Romans cherished, they also became very proud of their aqueducts. One Roman general raved about the abundance of water they had due to aqueducts, and even compared them to the pyramids of egypt, however this general may have been biased due to the fact that he was the water commissioner of Rome and most likely described the aqueducts as better than they really were in order to make himself look better as a professional (Doc 8). Both of these Romans sharing their excitement about new technology shows their positive attitude towards it. Han China citizens that had a positive attitude toward technology loved its efficiency and the protection it could offer to their country. Han government officials ordered that staffed water conservation offices should be made in order to prevent floods (Doc 1). Han China had decided that their solution to a flood natural disaster was to be equipped with the proper technology to avoid it. A Han philosopher discussed the evolution of technology in his writing, explaining how it has gotten more efficient over time (Doc 3). He saw technology as a good thing that would benefit society. In a history text explaining the rise of technology, it was said that governor Tu
Shih created items like a waterpowered blowingengine so he could save his common people labor, however this document may be unreliable due to the fact that this text was a governmentsponsored history made for the citizens of China, most likely to make the Han
Dynasty appear good (Doc 4). Some of Han China saw technology as a useful and efficient.
They thought everyone would benefit from it.
There were also members from the Roman Empire and Han China that did not find technology to be as great as others thought. Roman philosophers thought that laborers using technology were degrading themselves and had no skill (Doc 5). They also believed that a smart mind was far more important than technology and tools (Doc 7). On top of this, a Han government official believed that the revolution of technology was monopolizing industries, leading to high prices and low quality in goods (Doc 2). Both Roman Philosophers and Han government officials disliked technology, the philosophers saw technology as a tool laborers used to slack off and government officials thought that technology was monopolizing the economy. A document that would have been useful would be a perspective from a laborer in Han
China or the Roman Empire. All of the documents given were written by high up government
officials, or high class philosophers. Most people actually using technology at that time were lower class laborers. Their view would be the most accurate on how efficient or terrible technology was.
Romans who liked technology adored its beauty and practicality. Chinese who liked technology boasted about its efficiency and usefulness. Those who didn’t approve of technology saw it as disgraceful and bad towards the economy. Despite its popular use in both countries,
Han China’s opinion on teachnology was mixed in the way that philosophers found it to be extremely efficient and government officials found it to be monopolizing, and the Roman
Empire’s opinion was split between the government officials who thought it was beautiful and the philosophers who thought it was distasteful.
DBQ Essay Scoring Rubric
(20pts per Rubric point)
This list is abbreviated. For more complete scoring rubric details, see the handout from class.
Basic Core:
1.
Has acceptable thesis – 1 of 1
2.
Addresses all documents (or all but one) – 1 of 1
3.
Supports thesis with evidence for all (or all but one) document – 2 of 2
4.
Analyzes point of views in at least two documents – 1 of 1
5.
Analyzes documents by grouping them in two or three ways – 1 of 1
6.
Identifies and explains the need for an additional document – 1 of 1
Total: 7 of 7 (x20 = 140 out of 140)
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
needed a way to distribute water to the fields where the crops are growing. That 's when…
- 1461 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Another opinion on technology that the civilizations of Han China and Rome had that if technology was innovated by the consumers then it would be more efficient. This is shown through documents 2, 3, and 7. Document 2 states that consumer made tools…
- 696 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
From the second century B.C.E to 200 C.E, technology has proved an important role in the modernization and advancement of empires such as the Han and Roman. The Han’s attitude towards technology was that of respect and appreciation, which eventually lead to the advancement of their great empire. The Romans, however, although dependent on technology for resources like water and everyday usages like roads, had a negative and degrading attitude towards technology. The different attitudes can be explained by the different empires and parts of society that each of the authors of the documents were a part of. The Han and Roman attitudes had a stark contrast in belief, along with the different in political and government leaders with the upper-class. Another document that would have been helpful in the analysis of the differing attitudes would be an excerpt from a lower-class worker. All of the documents provided were from either the upper-class or a political or government leader who all had their own beliefs on what technology is like without being in direct contact with tools like a worker would have been.…
- 1029 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Both the Roman and the Han had advanced technology like roads, sewage/water systems, engineering, and architecture.…
- 366 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Han and the Romans both had very passive views when it came to technology, both sharing the "good is good enough" mindset. This appears through people of high class wanting higher quality materials and laborers, the Han enjoying a superb invention but not outwardly seeking to improve it, as well as the Romans appreciated fantastic inventions without searching for ways to improve…
- 64 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The Hans and the Romans both had very fascinating views on their technology. While The Han’s attitude toward technology was viewed as a positive contribution to their society the Romans had positive views other Romans had negative attitudes. Every document has its own opinions on the way they appreciate technology some support which is making then look good, while some think it’s for low class people and not for government. In order to fully analyze Han and Roman attitudes toward technology it would have been helpful to have an additional document of an interview with a Roman laborer because all of the other documents were from higher class Romans who did not work with tools and such technology.…
- 554 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Hans respect technology and the people who use it. In China, 2nd century B.C.E. a government official stated that he wanted to organize their labor force with the use of technology so they could help to prevent a disaster from occurring when and if a flood takes place. This could help the people from getting hurt and their property from getting destroyed (Doc. 1). Huan Guan, a Han government official during the first century B.C.E. was concerned about the lack of technology and poor government policy that is affecting the people. Haun Guan was trying to say to the Han government that using convict labor to make tools and monopoly on salt and iron is causing devastating affects towards the people and feels that the government can solve this problem by using the available technologies. Even though Haun Guan is a government official himself, he shows interest in helping the people and is very critical towards the current government policies that are in place (Doc. 2). Huan Tan, a upper class Han philosopher during 20 C.E. is expressing his…
- 926 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Although Doc 6 is about the admiration for another’s work, that is the end of the Roman compliments. Docs 5,6,7, and 8 all include some type of judgment in them. Whether it’s appropriate jobs for men, the lack of an inventor’s brilliance, or the superiority of Roman technology, there is definitely a hint of snobbery.…
- 449 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Han and Romans both used technology for conservation and storage purposes of water in the environment. In Document 1 written by a Han goverment official. He wrote about the most efficent ways to ensure that flooding would be prevented. He thinks everyone should cooperate togther as a team, the high officals should patrol each side of the river and the common people should help in construction and repair. They welcome technology in this way because it will be saving the…
- 903 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Roman and the Han were by far the most technologically advanced civilizations of their time. The time period for both of the societies depicted whether or not the people were inclined to their advancements or not. Much evidence goes to show that both the Roman and Han societies attitudes towards technology in B.C.E. were more negative and in C.E. they leaned more positive. In the documents given, it is evident that during the B.C.E. both the Roman and Han’s attitude toward their technologies were negative. Little did they know how helpful they would turn out to be and how they would revolutionize the world forever. This is first apparent from an excerpt from a Han government official. He states that they need more water conservation offices that are staffed with people who are experienced to aid the local community with the floods (doc. 1). This exemplifies that the people were dissatisfied with the lack of officials to keep the community organized and free of danger. This negative theme is also seen in a passage written by a Han government official (Han Guan) who is complaining about the iron tools and how they were made better when they were made individually by the common people rather than mass-produced by the state. He also touches on the fact that salt and iron prices have sky rocketed so the common people could not afford to season their food and make tools for themselves…
- 1174 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Keep in mind before that all these documents are written by upper Roman officials and leaders, therefore losing the voice of the lower classes and how they felt about technology. In document 5, it shows a negative attitude towards technology and says that the craftsmen’s occupations are vulgar and unbecoming. In document 6, it talks about how a Roman political leader in the second-century B.C.E and how he was anxious about road building, and paying attention to detail, and the person who wrote the passage was a high official from the first century C.E. In document 7, an upper-class Roman philosopher talks about how he doesn’t care about what inventions came first and that they were invented by people with a nimble and sharp mind, but not great or elevated, showing how they thought that using technology was beneath…
- 462 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Technology is the base of a civilization. There are, of course, many things far more necessary than technology, but the great empires of the early common era relied greatly on the use of modern tools in their daily lives. Two well known civilizations that relied on the use of technology are the Han and Rome ; however, their views wavered greatly, and yet, were related at the same time. Both civilizations worked hard on advances in water technology. Rome , as apposed to the Han Dynasty, is more self centered in their inventions, and ultimately, focused more on beauty, while the Han went for the cheaper alternative.…
- 1021 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In Document 6, the advancements made by Gaius Gracchus are stated by Plutarch, a Roman high official. The Romans created vast roads, paved with quarried stone and tightly packed sand. Bridges were built over streams and ravines that interrupted the flow of the roads. The roads were measured mile by mile through the use of stone columns, and other stones were set beside the roads to help those who rode horses to mount without the help of a groom. This can be seen as a sort of technology since the usage of the stones was replacing the help of a groomsman. In Document 8, Frontinus tells of the Roman aqueducts and its transportation of water. The volume of the aqueducts was measured by calibrated scales. There was such an abundance of water not only was it used for the public, but for…
- 1073 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Many people throughout time had different outlooks or opinions on technological advances. The outlook differed on people in each civilization. According to written articles, civilizations either were for or against technology; in some cases, they had pro and con opinions depending on when, and/or who wrote the article on their attitude towards technology.…
- 618 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Many Historians believe the Romans were civilised and advanced because Rome was supplied with over 1,000 liters of fresh spring water a…
- 811 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays