Preview

Death Penalty Argument Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
686 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Death Penalty Argument Essay
The Death Penalty

A society operates around communities of people who work together and do their part to form a functional place to live. Many people benefit from others throughout society without even knowing it. Society functions and benefits from people doing their part to keep our community safe and people benefit from society as well, but there is an exception. Criminals who have committed a crime that has placed them in prison for the rest of their life, without the possibility of parole, will never positively benefit society again, and this is why I feel so strongly about the death penalty being enforced more.
Criminals who spend the rest of their lives behind bars, without the possibility of parole, will never again positively benefit our society. They will only negatively affect society by using tax payers’ money to make sure they are provided with a comfortable living, which is undeserved, for the rest of their lives. I just don’t understand why our tax money is wasted on people who have committed a crime so badly that it completely removes them from society for the rest of their lives. I believe that criminals given life in prison, without the possibility of parole, should be sentenced to death because they should truly be punished for their crime.
I believe the death penalty should be enforced much more than it is. Criminals need to be scared of the consequences of their crimes. I believe that if the death penalty was enforced more, serious crimes and murder would decrease. Life in prison isn’t all that scary when you think about it. Criminals who commit very serious crimes, and are in prison for life, still get a bed to sleep in every night, they are given three meals a day, they get free time and time allowed for recreation, and some even get educations, and I feel that is not correct punishment for those people who have committed crimes serious enough to get them life in prison.
Even though I believe the death penalty should be enforced

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Retribution is the theory that the mandate to pay an offender back for his or her wrongdoing (pg. 6 Cullen). Conservatives lean in favor of this approach while liberals favor what is called “just deserts.” The difference between the two is that retribution is has the goal of ensuring that the offender endures the pain they have caused. Just desert want the offender to suffer no more than the pain caused. They wish to see that justice is served but not more than that which is truly deserved. One punishment that is considered retribution rather than rehabilitative is the death penalty. The argument that this punishment is more retribution is that the offender should suffer the same harm to which his or her inflicted on the victim. They see the…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Today, the death penalty is an issue that has raised many questions in regards to its morality. Many people believe that the death penalty is immoral for a number of factors, some of which being the execution of innocents, the arbitrary application of the death penalty, and the racial and economic discrimination with the system. Many others believe that the death penalty is moral, for it gives people what they deserve, the criminals were fully aware of the consequences that may fall upon them, and that justice is being served for the victims and families of the victims still suffering from the actions of the criminal. In this paper I will argue that from a Deontological standpoint, the death penalty is morally just. To do this, I will first describe the basics of the theory of Deontology in general, so that you, the reader, can begin to understand some of the fundamental beliefs that Kant, the father of Deontology,…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death penalty is the punish meant of execution, administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime and there are twenty-two countries in the world that still impose the death penalty for capital crimes, the United states is one of them. If you are charged with capital homicide, and the jury of twelve of your peers proclaims, “We find the defendant guilty as charged”(Condenaststore). Then it is simple, you are going to forfeit your life, so abolishing the death penalty or there’s no coming back from the grave.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Eagan Holmes was described as a quiet, standoffish, 24-year-old graduate student from San Diego who had earned a bachelor's degree in neuroscience in 2010 from the University of California, Riverside. Holmes then enrolled at the University of Colorado in June of 2011, taking graduate courses in neuroscience at the university's campus in Denver. He later dropped out of a doctoral program at the University's medical school, where he had been doing research.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is an extremely controversial topic in America, and people usually shy away from it, but speaking about controversial topics can help us come close to actually find solutions. This exercise was conducted in my survey of law class in which, we had gone over several homicide cases in which the criminal received the death penalty. In the end of the lesson, our teacher asked a simple question “raise your hand if you believe in the death penalty”. I was appalled to see that more than half believed it was worth it. In my mind it was clear that even though that person could have murdered another human being, we have no jurisdiction to kill them, and we would be no better as civilized being if we killed him.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Steve Earle is just one of the many protesters of the death penalty, stating “. . . The death penalty is based on the idea that this is a democracy, and in a democracy the government is me, and if the government kills somebody then I am killing somebody.” His quote is one of many negative views people have on the death penalty. The death penalty is based around the idea that it is acceptable to execute someone for killing. However, this is disagreed on by many Americans. In a survey from the PEW Research Center, results show that 56% of Americans still support the death penalty, compared to the 62% in 2011, and the 78% in the 1996 survey. The percent of people that still support the death penalty is at an all-time low, and is drastically dropping. This is an almost surefire indication that shows society wants the death penalty to be abolished. Although the death penalty is still an option in some states, it should be discontinued because of the immorality of execution, the staggering costs, and the potential injustices such as false execution.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A sixteen- year-old is prosecuted in adult court and is given the life sentence without any chance at parole. He doesn’t understand what is happening. His brain isn’t developed like any adults, nor does her comprehend the court surroundings. He is practically a victim to the justice system as he is being treated the same as a thirty-year-old criminal. Any offender under the age of twenty-one should be separated from adults in the justice system.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rogerian Argument

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although arguments from both sides have merit, my opinion is to support capital punishment. It is my belief that the death penalty saves many lives by not giving these people who commit heinous crimes a chance to do it again. Also, the death penalty invokes fear in people who might consider committing certain crimes. The relapse rate of people who commit heinous crimes and are released on parole is astounding. Many of these offenders are back in prison either from a repeat offense or a parole violation within a few years. If these offenders are given life in prison it is using up millions of dollars in taxpayers money to house and feed them. If the government could make the death row process shorter and limit appeals, it would reduce the amount…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my perspective the death penalty does not reach the minds of most criminals because a criminal rarely believes he/she could be caught. They hold a belief that they are intelligent enough to outsmart authorities. There is other whom holds such anger towards certain crimes that they believe death is a rightful punishment, but death does not “undo” a crime they have committed. I think it would be better for a criminal to think and reminisce their conscious. Their death would only put peace in their state of mind and except them from the punishments that prison holds for them. Families harmed by these criminals are sometimes frightened by the thought that they’re persecutor could escape and harm them again, however someone sentenced to life in parole in the united states has never escaped or been released. There is also a possibility that an innocent person could be convicted of a crime they did not commit, even with all our new technology and DNA testing there is always a chance of making a…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty In Prisons

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages

    These obstacles make it almost impossible for the death penalty to ever be carried out. Typically, death row inmates end up dying due to other factors such as health complications rather than being put to death (Petersen & Lynch, 2012, p. 1270). Essentially sentencing someone to death, and placing them on death row is basically the same as a sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole. The difference, however is that the sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole carries a significantly smaller price tag for tax payers. Furthermore, with violence rampant in prisons across the nation life in prison without the possibility of parole is not exactly living a comfortable life.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problem is too many people think the death penalty needs to go, and that life in prison is the obvious answer. The death penalty may seem bad, but in true reality it does great things for this country. The death penalty is not cruel, lowers crime rate, and represents true justice, why would you want to get rid of it? Do not support the removal of the death penalty, it is needed for the justice system, especially with the copious amount of crime going around these days. So, should that murderer be given life in prison, or the death penalty, your…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Forbes, the top ten most dangerous cities in the United States as of 2014,…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    die because they murdered someone that's why we have the life sentence or high security prisons. I don’t understand why the government should have decision on who should live and who shall perish . It's a very unusual and cruel punishment and the United States should retire using it.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today I came across a discussion on the death penalty on a progressive Facebook page. The post was in favor of execution, which was interesting to me because this is not the progressive position. In fact progressive position is staunchly opposed to the death penalty.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays