Preview

Death Penalty in the Philippines

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
584 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Death Penalty in the Philippines
Death Penalty in the Philippines
|Aquino administration |
|1987 |
|According to the 1987 Constitution, |
| Art. III (Bill of Rights), Sec. 19. |
|(1) Excessive fines shall not be imposed, nor cruel, degrading or inhuman punishment inflicted. Neither shall death penalty be imposed, |
|unless, for compelling reasons involving heinous crimes, the Congress hereafter provides for it. Any death penalty already imposed shall be|
|reduced to reclusion perpetua. |
|In mid-1987, a bill to seeking to reinstate the death penalty for 15 'heinous crimes' including murder, rebellion and the import or sale of|
|prohibited drugs was submitted in Congress. |
|1988 |
|In 1988, the military started lobbying for the imposition of the death penalty. Then Armed Forces of the Philippines Chief General Fidel |
|Ramos was prominent among those calling for the reintroduction of the death penalty for rebellion, murder and drug-trafficking. The |
|military campaign for the restoration of the capital punishment was primarily against the CPP-NPA, whose offensives then included urban |
|assassination campaigns.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Ring Vs Arizona Case Study

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages

    "It is insisted that the channeling and limiting of the sentencer's discretion in imposing the death penalty is a fundamental constitutional requirement for sufficiently minimizing the risk of wholly arbitrary and capricious action." (408 S Ct. 238 (1972).…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Phil 1112 Death Penalty

    • 1930 Words
    • 8 Pages

    "Illinois and Capital Punishment." The New York Times 14 Jan. 2011, Late Edition-Final ed., sec. A: 1. Print.…

    • 1930 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furman V Georgia

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For these and other reasons, at least two of my Brothers have concluded that the infliction of the death penalty is constitutionally impermissible in all circumstances under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Their case is a strong one. But I find it unnecessary to reach the ultimate question they would decide. See Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 297 U.S. 288, 347 (Brandeis, J., concurring).…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the eighteenth century the death sentence was used as a stern reprimand if a person defied the laws. In 1930 the U.S. Bureau of Justice started keeping a…

    • 2428 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    8th Amendment Essay

    • 2118 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The purpose of this paper will be to examine the extent in which capital punishment is allowed in the United States. Since early colonial America, the death penalty has been a major issue of debate among the public. Highly contested topics, beginning with the questionable morality of such a punishment and growing into more sophisticated arguments relating to the Eighth Amendment and race, have led to numerous United States Supreme Court cases looking to determine the extent in which capital punishment could be used in the United States.…

    • 2118 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The authors describe the history of the death penalty statues in the United States and how…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty has been a criminal sentence imposed in America for hundreds of years, but it have been extremely controversial as Evan Mandery illustrates in “A Wild Justice: The Death and Resurrection of Capital Punishment in America.” Today, the death sentence is strictly used in murder cases and in thirty-two out of the fifty states in America. In these states, it is completely legal to use the ultimate punishment of death to incapacitate a criminal from committing any further harm to society. Throughout American history, many individuals have supported the death penalty because they believe it is an effective way to deter crime and is a form of retribution. Others have strongly advocated against capital punishment because it is not morally correct and it not applied fairly. Also, some argue that it is unconstitutional to use the death penalty because it violates the cruel and unusual punishment provision of the Eight Amendment written in the United States Constitution.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is a controversy discussed by many state governments in the United States, the 8th amendment in the Bill of Rights is a right that protects people from cruel and unusual punishment. This amendment originally created by our founding fathers has been the main reason for this debate; some states look at death as cruel and unusual punishment while others don’t. Though the decision to sentence someone to death is considered harsh by some judges and juries, there have been crimes and occurrences where a judge feels a death penalty is reasonable.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun Control Shootings

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page

    Gun control usually refers to laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms. The U.S has a relatively low limit on gun possessions, compared to most industrial democracies. People argue if there should be more guns allowed, or less.…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sociology Death Penalty

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capital punishment has been a tool of the American judicial system since the beginning of our history as an attempt to deter it's citizens from committing acts of violence against others with an ambition for community safety. However, our system of law is too lagging and inconsistent for the prospect of death as punishment to be a deterrence which therefore calls for reform and restructure; perhaps adopting the old ways of countries far removed from Westernized thinking. Originally the sentence of capital punishment necessitated death by beheading however, along with the dilution of the name came weaker and more “humane” ways of executing prisoners and is now known as the death penalty.…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty In Prisons

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The death penalty now viewed as so barbaric that the views around the world have shifted so much that the U.S continuous to be the only country in Western Democracy to carry it out (Manning & Rhoden-Trader, 2000). The U.S has now begun to recognize so many problems that the death penalty system has such as it being unequally applied to minorities time and time again. Furthermore, the cost of carrying out an execution is staggering compared to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Inmates that were sitting on death row have been and continue to be exonerated which means innocent people can be put to death. One other major problems with the death penalty and statistics have shown that it simple does not deter crime. For these reasons and more I believe we should abolish the death penalty and never look…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "Death Penalty". News Batch, Your Internet Guide to an Understanding of Policy Issues March 2005. 20 May 2005. < http://www.newsbatch.com/deathpenalty.htm>…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is a major topic for debate Shannon Rafferty defends in her portfolio published by Penn State entitled “Death Penalty Persuasive Essay.” She believes the penalty should be allowed because it functions as a deterrent, it provides society retribution and it is morally just. Olivia H. disagrees with use of the death penalty in her essay “Capital Punishment Is Dead wrong.” She tells about the risk of punishing the innocent, and how the states are doing irreversible acts of crime. As the authors disagree about whether the death penalty should be allowed, they have some common ground when it comes to admitting the potential for human error and in both disagreeing to the use of barbaric punishments by the government.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This article provides applicable information from many sources such as a Governors, Political Science Professors, the Executive Director of the Death Penalty Information Center as well as the President of the United States, providing legitimacy to the…

    • 2185 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti Death Penalty

    • 1187 Words
    • 4 Pages

    WE IN THE NEGATIVE SIDE YOUR EXCELLENCIES TRULY BELIEVE THAT DEATH PENALTY IS NOT THE KEY SOLUTION TO THE DETTERENT OF CRIMES., IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATEMENT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE “Justice that kills is not justice. The imposition of capital punishment has no positive impact on crime prevention or security and does not in any way repair the harm done to the victims and their families. WE BELIEVE THAT LIFE IMPRISONMENT IS ENOUGH WE ONLY NEED TO STRENGTHEN THE POLICE POWER HERE IN OUR STATE,BY EMPOWERING THE LAW ENFORCEMENT WE CAN ENSURE THAT THE CRIME RATE HERE IN THE PHILIPPHINES WILL DECREASE. WHY DO WE NEED TO REINSTATE THE DEATH PENALTY? FIRST OF ALL MORALITY: Ultimately, the moral question surrounding capital punishment has less to do with whether those convicted of violent crime deserve to die than with whether state and governments deserve to kill those whom it has imprisoned. The legacy of racial apartheid, racial bias, and ethnic discrimination is unavoidably evident in the administration of capital punishment. Death sentences are imposed in criminal justice system that treats you better if you are rich and guilty than if you are poor and innocent. This is an immoral condition that makes rejecting the death penalty on moral grounds not only defensible but necessary for those who refuse to accept unequal or unjust administration of punishment.Moreover “An eye for an eye” does not mean vengeance, for the Almighty God himself said, vengeance is mine and by this he meant he would met justice in accordance with his mysterious way through the Ten Commandments from which morals laws were taken. ACCORDING TO ARTICLE 3 SECTION ONE NO one has the right to deprive another person of his life, or to degrade him or her to the status of an animal, or abuse and debase a person to the extent of destroying forever his or her dignity. In the Philippines where there is no clean and fair justice system, there is no doubt that if ever the Republic Act No. 7659 or…

    • 1187 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays