Tinsa Lyn-Scot Kamp
SOC101: Introduction to Sociology
Professor Rachael Horn
February 14th, 2011
Death Penalty: For or Against? I have to admit, I did have a preconceived idea of how I felt about the death penalty before reading the article in our textbook, (p.175-177), The Death Penalty in the United States and Worldwide. (Schaefer, 2009) This article really sheds some light on the whole idea of sentencing death as a punishment for a crime committed. After reading this and a few other articles, I found myself changing my opinions quite rapidly. Many reasons are the reason for this quite positive yet hasty change. Many people, sometimes especially the victim’s family members, feel that the death penalty should be reinforced for such crimes as murder, rape, and child molestation. Perhaps this very strong feeling is due to the pain and anger they feel for the loss of their loved one(s)? Perhaps this is the way they would feel whether or not they had been a victim of such a horrible situation and loss? In whichever circumstance, it is a very hard decision to make. According to journalist Cathleen Kaveny, “hard cases keep ethical reflection honest.” (2010)
In our society, being for or against the death penalty is most likely, always going to be a debatable decision for punishment in our society. It is a decision and/or belief that should not be made easily or taken lightly. We are talking about taking the life of another human being for a crime they have been convicted of and found guilty of. This is certainly not a stress-free type of judgment to make; as it should never be very tranquil to come to the conclusion that taking someone’s life is the best route for a punishment.
Many questions are raised when it comes to the death penalty. First and foremost, does it serve as a deterrent to crime? In my own opinion, it does not. Most criminals, especially those who commit most heinous crimes, stare death in the face every day they go outside their homes. This doesn’t stop them from being a criminal, so why would the death penalty scare them? After all, they may not even get caught, charged, or convicted! I just don’t think that death is a number one concern for the most dangerous criminals out there today!
Though it may not scare these high ranked street criminals, the death penalty was brought into motion for a reason. One of the main reasons was for the simple fact of making sure that the perpetrator isn’t going to hurt another human being ever again. Also making them pay for the crime they committed with the ultimate punishment that is irreversible; capital punishment. What about the people who are being falsely accused and convicted of a crime they simply did not commit? For whatever reason they are being convicted the reality of the matter is that people have and will continue to be falsely euthanized as way of capital punishment.
There is a man named Robert Gene Will on death row in Arlington, Texas for being convicted of a crime that he simply did not commit. There were two men in the scenario, Rob and his friend Rocky. Both men ran from the police; however, Rob is the one that was caught, cuffed, then later charged and convicted for a murder that Rocky committed. Rocky snuck behind Deputy Barrett Hill and shot him in the back, freed Rob, and the two ran in opposite directions. To this day Rob is still on death row, fighting his was through endless appeals to free him of a crime that he did not commit. To complicate matter worse, Rocky is the son of one of the county’s deputy police officers. (Booker, Schulte, 2011)
So, after reading this story, should I support a form of punishment for convicted criminals that is corrupt in places such as Texas? I think not! If only ONE place was corrupt, that is enough for me to say there is a chance of this situation elsewhere in the United States. This particular case is a result of a son of a police officer getting away with something just for the simple fact that he “knows someone” in the system; while another man is being falsely convicted and sentenced to death for that crime. This is not something that I would be willing to risk when contemplating the death penalty.
Another question that comes to light with the death penalty is, should youths who have been convicted of violent crimes be subject to the death penalty? To answer this question simply, (which is exactly what it is to me a simple question to answer) absolutely not! Children are just that: children. They are not taught any better than what the parents teach them. If a child is raised in a gang lifestyle, should he/she be punished for something that they don’t even know any differently? I don’t think so. How are they to learn differently if they are never taught? I don’t think they should get away with violent crimes; however, children or youths are not mentally mature enough to be held responsible for something the same as an adult would be. Children and youths have completely different minds than adults do. Also, in most cases and adult has a better sense of judgment than that of a child or youth. The youth of today’s society, and really at any point in time, have so much to learn and grow from that it is practically unconstitutional to charge and/or convict a child or youth of a violent crime as an adult.
Overall, I would say that I am completely against the death penalty. The main reason for this is my religion. In my Bible it says, “thou shall not murder” in Exodus 20:13. This means that you should not murder. I really don’t feel that murdering a murderer is saying something great. I didn’t feel this way at the beginning of this assignment. I thought that in certain cases the death penalty was okay. I do not feel this way anymore. Some people feel that it would be cheaper to “just kill them!” This is not the case. It is over two times more expensive to sentence one to death than to sentence them to life in prison. (Schaefer, 2009) On this fact alone we should be reconsidering the terms in which one would receive the death penalty as punishment!
References
Booker, K., Schulte, B., & (2011, February). Issue 53. In Rob Will: Innocent and fighting on Texas death row [article]. Retrieved February 12, 2011, from Campaign to End the Death Penalty website: http://nodeathpenalty.org/new_abolitionist/february-2011-issue-53/ rob-will-innocent-and-fighting-texas-death-row Kaveny, C.. (2010). A Horrific Crime. Commonweal, 137(22), 6. Retrieved February 13, 2011, from ProQuest Religion. (Document ID: 2232105371).
Schaefer, R.T. (2009) Sociology: A brief introduction (8th ed.) New York, NY: McGraw Hill
References: Booker, K., Schulte, B., & (2011, February). Issue 53. In Rob Will: Innocent and fighting on Texas death row [article]. Retrieved February 12, 2011, from Campaign to End the Death Penalty website: http://nodeathpenalty.org/new_abolitionist/february-2011-issue-53/ rob-will-innocent-and-fighting-texas-death-row Kaveny, C.. (2010). A Horrific Crime. Commonweal, 137(22), 6. Retrieved February 13, 2011, from ProQuest Religion. (Document ID: 2232105371). Schaefer, R.T. (2009) Sociology: A brief introduction (8th ed.) New York, NY: McGraw Hill
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The death penalty is a very controversial topic that some may oppose while others assent. I have read two interesting essays about the death penalty. One is entitled “The Penalty of Death” by H.L Mencken and the other “Execution” by Anna Quindlen. Both authors presented their arguments and used great points to support their opinions. H.L Mencken is for the death penalty while Anna Quindlen is against it. After reading these two authors work I was able to form my own opinion on this punishment. I condone the death penalty despite how cruel it may be.…
- 311 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The article “To Kill or Not to Kill” by Scott Turrow was written to examine the fairness and effectiveness of the capital punishment system. The author believes that it is important to address this issue because the current system is very flawed and cannot be trusted with consistent results, the author looked closely for the arguments of for and against the death penalty . In one of the first arguments that ambivalence in the death penalty is something that people have struggled through throughout the years, he uses statistics and percentages as well as emotional appeal to point people who are both for and against the death penalty in the same direction, As Turrow’s said “Many Americans question the system's over-all fairness and its ability…
- 145 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Capital punishment has long been on the chopping block within many forums in America. Most in favor will argue, when considering the most heinous and wicked of crimes, criminals committing these crimes should be put to death. Those opposed will always take the stance that capital punishment is unacceptable in a civilized society in that it is a cruel form of punishment. My stance is one of support for capital punishment in the capacity that it is a necessity in respect to the basic premise of the severity of punishment being weighed against the circumstances of the crime.…
- 633 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In our country’s justice system the death penalty is good for many things, such as, serving as a deterrent for violent crimes all over the nation. We as humans have the ability to decide for ourselves whether an idea is good or bad. Often times to do this we look at the actions of others to earthier strengthen our confidence in our idea or to deter the idea that we have. This is the same concept that the death penalty brings to our society. the death penalty according to Richard Worsnop a writer for the CQ Researcher, “…is traditionally justifiyed in society for two reasons, retribution and detturance(Williams). The Latter of the two in retrospect is the most important. In our justice system the main crimes that are punishable by the death penalty are felony murder or murder in the first degree(Mitchell). Felony murder is defined as, “a killing treated as a murder because, though…
- 1120 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
“An eye for an eye,” right? As fair as America tries to be, sometimes we also have to remember that an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. Many people rave about how the death penalty is an unjust punishment and that we can do without it; the idea of killing someone so that the punishment fits the crime is what shows how our world and societies are just as cruel as the criminals in it. The death penalty debate is a dispute that is learning to become more immoral and becoming a less used tactic when penalizing criminals. This problem has decreased significantly over the last couple decades but the controversy is still up in the air nearly everywhere. Additionally, much of the controversy has a heavy influence on biomedical research due to the fact that lethal injection is highly used for execution purposes. Currently many professionals are looking for other forms of punishment, yet there are still many people who believe that this is a fair and equal punishment. Regardless of which side one is on, both perspectives offer good reasoning to why or why not the death penalty should continue to stay in effect. Althought I do not agree with the death many and it’s many consequences, I understand the reason for it being so controversial.…
- 1930 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
The death penalty has been an ongoing debate on whether it should be allowed or whether it violates our constitutional right. While most developed Western nations have stopped executing the United States continues to execute offenders (Zimring 2004). From 1977 through 2008 1,136 people have been executed, which consisted of people who committed murder (Procon 2010). Those who are in favor of the death penalty believe it is an important tool to help deter crime and it cost less than life imprisonment (Procon 2010). They believe retribution helps console the grieving family and it also ensures that the offender will never be able to commit another heinous crime (Procon 2010). According to Grant (2004) some people believe that some offenders should face the death penalty because of vengeance and retribution for violent crimes. During the…
- 1847 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
“In a monumental 1972 decision by the US Supreme Court, all but a few death penalty statutes in the United States were declared unconstitutional” (Radelet & Borg, 2000, page 1). Four years later the Supreme Court reversed its course toward abolition by approving several newly enacted capital statutes. By 1999, there were “some 3500 men and 50 women on death rows in 38 states and two federal jurisdictions” (Radelet & Borg, 2000, page 1). The author describes how there has been fluctuations in the general population opinion regarding the death penalty since its reintroduction in 1976. While the majority of the American public supports the death penalty, recent studies have shown that this support has diminished a little.…
- 883 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The death penalty has been a criminal sentence imposed in America for hundreds of years, but it have been extremely controversial as Evan Mandery illustrates in “A Wild Justice: The Death and Resurrection of Capital Punishment in America.” Today, the death sentence is strictly used in murder cases and in thirty-two out of the fifty states in America. In these states, it is completely legal to use the ultimate punishment of death to incapacitate a criminal from committing any further harm to society. Throughout American history, many individuals have supported the death penalty because they believe it is an effective way to deter crime and is a form of retribution. Others have strongly advocated against capital punishment because it is not morally correct and it not applied fairly. Also, some argue that it is unconstitutional to use the death penalty because it violates the cruel and unusual punishment provision of the Eight Amendment written in the United States Constitution.…
- 1037 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
I initially found it almost absurd that people who support the death penalty, but I soon realized that the grieving families who lost their loved one would feel more comfortable knowing that the punishment had been paid. It And that for them, they can rest easier and continue on with their lives. And that with the process of the death penalty, the criminal would have an impossible chance to escape the prison and commit more crimes.Many of the students that favored pro death were affected by a criminal hurting one of their loved ones. And as soon as I realized this, it made perfect sense that they wanted the death penalty out of defense for themselves and their community, because they did not desire anyone to endure their…
- 740 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
There are many differences in the way people view the death penalty. Some are against it and some agree with it. There have been many studies trying to prove or disprove a point regarding the death penalty. Some have regarded the death penalty as a hindrance, and some have regarded it as state sanctioned murder and not civilized. The death penalty has been linked to societies for hundreds of years. More recently, as we become more civilized, the death penalty has been questioned on if it is the correct way to so enforce justice on the people. The death penalty is a highly controversial subject. No one knows who’s right or who’s wrong-it’s fifty percent speculation and fifty percent research. It’s just a lot of thoughts and beliefs from people who have contributed to the death penalty controversy. Who’s right and who’s wrong? That is the question.…
- 2140 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The death penalty has always been a controversial topic in the United States. It is outlawed in 16 states, but it should be abolished in all fifty states. The act of the death penalty is irrational, costly, inhumane, and religiously immoral. Taking an individual’s life, because he/she murdered someone is senseless and is not a good representation of the United States.…
- 1980 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
References: Mid-Atlantic Innocence Project. (2006). Retrieved January 14, 2009, from Charlena Fuqua. (2007). The History and Future of the Death Penalty, paragraph 3. Retrieved January 14,2009, from http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/442918/the_history_and_future_of_the_death.html?cat=17 Appendix G Peer Review* Checklist…
- 858 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
The death penalty is a major topic for debate Shannon Rafferty defends in her portfolio published by Penn State entitled “Death Penalty Persuasive Essay.” She believes the penalty should be allowed because it functions as a deterrent, it provides society retribution and it is morally just. Olivia H. disagrees with use of the death penalty in her essay “Capital Punishment Is Dead wrong.” She tells about the risk of punishing the innocent, and how the states are doing irreversible acts of crime. As the authors disagree about whether the death penalty should be allowed, they have some common ground when it comes to admitting the potential for human error and in both disagreeing to the use of barbaric punishments by the government.…
- 413 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
"Innocence and the Death Penalty." Death Penalty Information Center. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 Sept. 2012.…
- 1078 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
This article provides applicable information from many sources such as a Governors, Political Science Professors, the Executive Director of the Death Penalty Information Center as well as the President of the United States, providing legitimacy to the…
- 2185 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays