debate
Parliamentary form of government is better
Good morning sir chairperson and members of jury. Friends, I want to ask if a man designated to wind a clock at 12 noon everyday does not do his job, is the clock to be changed or the man to be fired? What will change by switching to a presidential system? Corruption gone------ bureaucracy efficiency incarnate, ----------every MP and MLA a beacon of integrity, ---- no more caste, crime, violence? ----------Nothing will change, -----the same rats will make new holes in a new almirah, ------yes, sir, the same rats will make new holes. This is not about changing the rules of the game, but playing the game better. We need better people in politics, we need better politics.
The presidential system is quite flawed and is not suitable for a country like India --- which is the second most populous country----------and whose diversity ---------in terms of language, culture and religion ---------is immense. It has many demerits like: ------it encourages a 2-party system which may not represent the interests of all Indians. --------Voters would vote for a party based on the personality of the presidential candidate and not--------- on the ideology, -------President may be from one party, but the government may be from another party with a completely different ideology, which can lead to policy paralysis--------- if there is a clash of views.
I want to ask my friends are they not aware that in India, Dalits have been in power in UP, Rajasthan, Bihar, Maharashtra and Andhra? How can they be thankless to the ability of the Indian parliamentary system? In our system, national parties are forced to share power with local parties. In today's day and age, proper checks and balances are an absolute requirement to ensure that we do not create monsters like Hitler. My worthy friends can take that risk but I feel that a dictator is dangerous because he can get away with genocide. ------So what is the other option? Only a
Good morning sir chairperson and members of jury. Friends, I want to ask if a man designated to wind a clock at 12 noon everyday does not do his job, is the clock to be changed or the man to be fired? What will change by switching to a presidential system? Corruption gone------ bureaucracy efficiency incarnate, ----------every MP and MLA a beacon of integrity, ---- no more caste, crime, violence? ----------Nothing will change, -----the same rats will make new holes in a new almirah, ------yes, sir, the same rats will make new holes. This is not about changing the rules of the game, but playing the game better. We need better people in politics, we need better politics.
The presidential system is quite flawed and is not suitable for a country like India --- which is the second most populous country----------and whose diversity ---------in terms of language, culture and religion ---------is immense. It has many demerits like: ------it encourages a 2-party system which may not represent the interests of all Indians. --------Voters would vote for a party based on the personality of the presidential candidate and not--------- on the ideology, -------President may be from one party, but the government may be from another party with a completely different ideology, which can lead to policy paralysis--------- if there is a clash of views.
I want to ask my friends are they not aware that in India, Dalits have been in power in UP, Rajasthan, Bihar, Maharashtra and Andhra? How can they be thankless to the ability of the Indian parliamentary system? In our system, national parties are forced to share power with local parties. In today's day and age, proper checks and balances are an absolute requirement to ensure that we do not create monsters like Hitler. My worthy friends can take that risk but I feel that a dictator is dangerous because he can get away with genocide. ------So what is the other option? Only a