We reserve the right to provide counter-definitions should disagree with our opponents:
China
From the Encyclopedia Brittanica (http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/111803/China):
"China, Chinese (Pinyin) Zhonghua or (Wade-Giles) Chung-hua, officially People’s Republic of China, Chinese (Pinyin) Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo or (Wade-Giles) Chung-hua Jen-min Kung-ho-kuo, country of East Asia. It is the largest of all Asian countries and has the largest population of any country in the world. Occupying nearly the entire East Asian landmass, it occupies approximately one-fourteenth of the land area of the Earth. Among the major countries of the world, China is surpassed in area by only Russia and Canada, and it is almost as large as the whole of Europe."
Benefitial: receiving or entitling one to receive advantage, use, or benefit. Merriam Webster
interests of the United States: What we will find, is the United States has all kinds of interests; national security interests, economic interests, energy interests, and just about anything which promotes the well-being of the nation, both at home and abroad.
Criteria- Since the resolution says interests and not interest, the Negation must show all of the interests are not beneficial , but it is also hurting us. In return, the Affirmation must only show that any benefits would be an interest to the United States.
Observation 1: The “rise of the China” began in 1978, when Deng Xiaoping instituted the first economic reforms to shift the nation toward a market-based economy, allowing private firms to operate in the country beginning in 1980 (BBC 2012).National Forensics League Keith West https://www.pfdebate.com/uploads/-userdocs_publicDocs_Dahan_February_PF_Analysis.pdf
Observation 2: What we will find, is the United States has all kinds of interests; national security interests, economic interests, energy interests, and just about anything which promotes the well-being of the nation, both at home and abroad.
Contention 1:TRADE WITH CHINA GOOD: TRADE IS ALWAYS GOOD!
Sub-point A: THE UNITED STATES IS ONE TRILLION DOLLARS RICHER EVERY YEAR DUE TO FREE TRADE-University of California Los Angeles Asian American Studies Center '12
[The US-China Trade Imbalance Benefits the United States; Importing from China, 2012; Gale Group]
The Battle Over Free Trade: It is commonly accepted that most economists, including the many experts cited in these pages, are advocates of free trade. Economists at the Institute for International Economics and the Center for Strategic and International Studies, for example, argue that over the last 60 years, the U.S. economy is "about a $1 trillion per year richer as a result of the expansion of international trade ... and could gain another $500 billion annually if the world were to move to totally free trade." There would, however, also be losses of around $50 billion per year in the form of lost jobs, and lower wages for some. It is likely that most of these same economists advocating for free trade are highly skilled and will not have to worry about losing their jobs to another economist in China or India. But for the majority of American workers, the pain of job losses is very real. Little wonder, then, that there is much ambivalence in the U.S. about free trade, as is reflected in the fact that major trade legislation in Congress in the last decade has had about equal numbers of supporters and detractors. For better or worse, China has become the face of globalization, and rightly or wrongly, has become an easy target for many Americans' anxieties. Ultimately, politicians need to know that the attitude of Americans towards global trade will depend in large part on the degree to which the U.S. can provide the proper education and (re)training programs to move displaced workers into new jobs that can take advantage of globalization.
Sub-point B: MANY AMERICAN COMPANIES, AMERICAN CONSUMERS AND THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT ALL BENEFITS FROM THE TRADE IMBALANCE WITH CHINA-University of California Los Angeles Asian American Studies Center '12
[The US-China Trade Imbalance Benefits the United States; Importing from China, 2012; Gale Group]
Who Has Benefited from China's Big Trade Surplus with the U.S.?
Certain American Companies: American companies and businesses, especially large firms who have been able to relocate or outsource to China, have been the big beneficiaries as they've seen their comparative costs reduced. In fact, U.S. firms have profited handsomely from their businesses in China with over $4 billion in profits in 2007, 50% more than a year ago. These companies are also the ones most likely to lobby Congress against passing tariffs.
American Consumer: The average American consumer has benefited from the huge volume and wider variety of lower-cost goods (for everything from toys to clothing, footwear and electronics) coming out of China.
American Government: The American government has also benefited from China's trade surplus as China has recycled its foreign exchange surplus into U.S. Treasury securities, which have helped fund everything from America's wars to the bailout of the U.S. sub-prime mortgage crises.
Contention 2: TRADE WITH CHINA GOOD: WILL BRING LONG TERM JOB GROWTH
US NEEDS TO ACT TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE POSITIVE IMPACT OF A GROWING CHINA-Castelazo '12
[Molly; Founding Director of Future of US-China Trade; University of Arizona and the Kearny Alliance; In the Long Run, US-China Trade Is Good for Both Countries; Importing from China; 2012; Gale Group]
Peter Yam, Former president of Emerson Greater China and chairman of Emerson Electric (China) Holdings Co., Ltd. "Both [U.S.] lawmakers and the government must wake up and exert leadership in providing an environment for the US firms to become effective global competitors again and regain its strength on exports."
Subpoint A: WHILE A RISING CHINA MEANS SHORT-TERM JOB LOSS, IN THE LONG RUN, A GREATER NUMBER OF HIGHER-QUALITY JOBS WILL RESULT-Castelazo '12
[Molly; Founding Director of Future of US-China Trade; University of Arizona and the Kearny Alliance; In the Long Run, US-China Trade Is Good for Both Countries; Importing from China; 2012; Gale Group]
From Microsoft and Motorola to Wal-Mart and KFC, there are a number of American and multinational companies that operate in China and are more successful because of it (And while these companies benefit from manufacturing in China for export elsewhere, they also benefit from selling to China's consumer market.)
Because trade makes the people in China more prosperous, they purchase more—and they purchase, in part, what U.S. companies make.
"Made in China" products are often less expensive than products manufactured elsewhere—allowing consumers in America access to less expensive goods, from sweaters to computers.
While economic integration may lead to job losses in the short-term, in the long run a greater number of higher-quality jobs are created as a result of integration than are lost.
| |
|UNITED STATES EXPORTS |
|Exports in the United States increased to 182550 USD Million in November of 2012 from 180810 USD Million in October of 2012. Exports in the United States is |
|reported by the U.S. Census Bureau. Historically, from 1992 until 2012, the United States Exports averaged 101455.75 USD Million reaching an all time high of |
|187327 USD Million in September of 2012 and a record low of 50044 USD Million in May of 1992. United States is the world's third largest exporter. Main |
|exports are: Industrial Supplies (34 percent of total exports) and Capital Goods (33 percent). Foods, feeds, and beverages account for 9 percent; Automotive |
|vehicles, parts, and engines for another 9 percent and Consumer goods for 12 percent. Main exports partners are: Canada (19 percent of total exports), |
|European Union (17 percent), Mexico (14 percent), China (7 percent) and Japan (5 percent). This page includes a chart with historical data for the United |
|States Exports. |
|[pic] |
C3: CHINESE IMPORTS GOOD: US EXPORTS INCREASING
US EXPORTS HAVE BEEN INCREASING-Meltzer '12
[Joshua; Fellow with the Global Economy and Development Program at the Brookings Institution; Both China and the United States Need to Rebalance Their Economies; Importing from China; 2012; Gale Group]
The growth in U.S. exports is similarly good news. The 20 percent increase in exports in 2010 occurred across a range of sectors, including hi-tech goods, automotives and agriculture products. This demonstrates growing overseas demand for export-orientated industries, which should improve the growth and jobs prospects in these sectors. This is also important for [President Barack] Obama's goal of doubling U.S. exports by 2015.
For all the following reasons and above, I urge you for an affirmation ballot.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Since initiating market reforms in 1978, China has shifted from a centrally planned to a market based economy and experienced rapid economic and social development. GDP growth averaging about 10 percent a year has lifted more than 600 million people out of poverty. All Millennium Development Goals have been reached or are within reach.…
- 1601 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
essay. Introduction. China is a large country located in Eastern Asia. Its population is over one billion people. It is a country with a very rich, long history.…
- 654 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
With that in mind, my partner and I negate the resolution. Resolved: Unilateral military force by the United States is justified to prevent nuclear proliferation.…
- 2398 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
According to Sarkesian, “US national interests are expression of US values projected into the domestic and international arenas.” The concerns of technology, totalitarianism, and suspicion of the military have developed into the four core national interests. President Roosevelt saw the need for unity among military branches necessary in order to combat against the concerns of national interest. President Truman adapted the national interests to show the strength of the U.S. The national interests described by the founders of the National Security Act of 1947 can be seen in today’s interests.…
- 974 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
[ 7 ]. "Resolution 84." Security Council Resolutions 1950. UN, n.d. Web. 4 May 2013.…
- 1867 Words
- 8 Pages
Best Essays -
In the article,” Late Term Abortions Should Be banned”, Susan E. Wills argues late term abortion is unnecessary and should be banned. She gives descriptions of what happens during these procedures. The information is provided from doctors and nurses and judges supporting her argument. In the first portion of the article she uses historical reference of the Nazi occupied Germany in comparison to late term abortions, claiming they are much too close to infanticide. She questions where the line should be drawn on abortion and what people are willing to consider OK. Towards the end of her article wills also gives the Americans opinion on late term abortions. She gives reference to national polls on this topic in favor of the ban. She goes into detail of how the view of abortion has changed in America.…
- 961 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Technology is the collection of tools, including machinery, modifications, arrangement and procedures used by humans. Technologies involve the manipulation of the environment to meet certain human needs such as food, shelter, communication, and health. The development of various technologies has been affected by and has affected the environment, human societies, and science. One piece of technology that has influenced humans significantly has been the computer. Through its historical significance and evolution, the computer has impacted politics, economies, social life, and the environment.…
- 1216 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The English only debate has been an ongoing deliberation for many decades in the United States. Questions from political parties, legislators, and common people have been a hot topic on the English only subject and what they believe would be best for the nation (Echevarria, Vogt, & Short, 2008). Would having English as the national language of the United State unify the nation or would it tear it apart? Would it be politically correct? Would it be fair? Would it cause segregation? Would it be a security threat? These are just some of the questions that…
- 1220 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
The U.S is one of the leading voices of the UN security Council which was created to maintain international peace…
- 1465 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Use this as a guideline in planning your speeches. For two-person teams, each person will give one constructive speech, and you may either have one person do the rebuttal or share it. For three-person teams, each person gets one speech.…
- 463 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
5 The message of universal rights was beset with contradictions. Many ideals in the “Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen” were replete with dubious meanings. For example, “the law has the right to forbid only actions injurious to society” had nothing to say about criminal offences against other individuals.…
- 475 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
A.G. Harmsworth. If the Loch Ness Monster Exists, What Is It? Reptile, Invertebrate, Amphibian, Mammal, Delta Quadrant Shape Shifter, Fish or Nothing? 2010. http://www.loch-ness.org/candidates.html…
- 708 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Because I agree with Mahatma Gandhi, I affirm the resolution which states Resolved: Rehabilitation ought to be valued above Retribution in the US Criminal Justice System.…
- 918 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), after more than a decade since its inception, merits increasing attentions from the world and meanwhile different explanations of the objective and main agenda of this organization are heatedly debated and evaluated. One of them is the sensational argument that it is an anti-Western alliance which reflects a reasonable suspicion given China and Russia’s leading role in it. However, it is more convincing that the SCO is only a regional, multilateral cooperation organization with an anti-Western face. What this essay strives to prove is that the SCO dose have an anti-Western face but this face is only one of its multiple faces, given the organization is inherently inspired by mutual benefits of cooperation and constrained by its members’ diversified interests coupled with potential conflicts and competition, and it is inappropriate to regard the anti-Western aspect as the dominant agenda or objective of the organization with a neglect of its inherent contradictions among its members. In the first place, the SCO’s anti-Western inclination is recognized and assessed. Then, its member states’ divergent interests and opinions are discussed to prove its inherent remote possibility to form an anti-Western based, cohesive alliance which poses practical threats to the West especially America. Finally, after proving anti-Western as one of its faces, other objectives of the organization are displayed and their practical significance is discussed and highlighted. In addition, because of the lack of a clear concept of “anti-Western”, anti-American in this essay is more focused on because America is a prominent representative and leader of the west.…
- 3277 Words
- 14 Pages
Best Essays -
You will only be informed 10 minutes before the commencement of the debate if you are a member of the affirmative or negative team. This is why it is very important to be fully prepared to debate on both sides of the topic.…
- 708 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays