Preview

Defamation

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3294 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Defamation
EPGP 2013 Alok Jain | 1314005 | Guru Nandan Singh | 1314019 | Nitin Agarwal NK | 1314032 | Rahul Kumar | 1314040 | Rahul Singh | 1314041 |

Online Defamation – What does law say?

Table of Contents

1. Introduction 3 1.1 What is Defamation? 3 1.2 How about freedom of speech? 4 1.3 Online Defamation 5
2. Recourses to defamation in India 5
3. Can online defamation law be misused? 8
4. Conclusion 10
5. References 12
-------------------------------------------------

Introduction

1.1 What is Defamation?

(Shakespear's Othello, Act-II, Scene III, pp.167)
A good name is worth more than good riches. Good name in man and woman, dear my Lord Is the immediate jewel of their souls; Who steals my purse, steals trash; its something nothing; T'was mine, t'is, and has been slave to thousands; But he that filches from me my good name, robs me of that which not enriches him And makes me poor indeed. [1]

As per www.wsj.com “Defamation is a legal wrong emerging from an act of injuring a person’s reputation and sullying their character without lawful justification or excuse.”

In history, the root of this misconduct is in the act of shouting. The Praetorian Edict circa 130 AD had made the act of cursive public pronouncement, through shouting, to be gravely punishable. The code had declared: "qui, advesus bonos mores convicium cui fecisse cuiusve opera factum esse dicitur, quo adversus bonos mores convicium Weret, in eum iudicium dabo." That is, shouting words and invectives contrary to public morals shall be punishable. [2]

Everyone has right to good reputation. Defamation is a false and unprivileged statement of fact that is harmful to someone's reputation or good name.

Defamation is of two kinds:
Slander – there is no permanency about slander because it is a spoken statement. It can also be a non verbal gesture or something similar. Example:
“B tells C that A is a fraud. Because of this C refuses to do business with A and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    WIRETIME has committed an intentional business related tort known as Defamation. In this case all four elements of defamation are present. A defamatory statement was made, it was spread to a third party, the statement was very definite to one company, and it caused damages to BUGusa business.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bugusa Case Study

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A Tort was committed by WIRETIME, Inc. which means “a civil wrong where on party has acted, or in some cases failed to act, and that action or inaction causes a loss to be suffered by another party” (Melvin, S.P., 2011) The statement made by WIRETIME, Inc. will potentially harm Bugusa, Inc. reputation. A statement made by WIRETIME, Inc. accusing Bugusa, Inc. products were low quality and did not work past a months’ time. This type of statement is a defamatory “A false and defamatory…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first rule applied in this case was the rule of libel and slander, which states that the cause of defamation must include four elements: “1) a false and defamatory statement concerning the plaintiff; 2) an unprivileged communication to a third party; 3) fault by the defendant amounting at least to negligence; and 4) special harm of the actionability of the statement irrespective of special harm.” (822) Libel is the defamation of one’s character in written form, and slander is the…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bugusa, Inc., Worksheet

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Communicated to a third party. By advertising the disparaging statement, WIRETIME communicated to a third party, the public, thus satisfying the third condition of trade libel.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    b) If the person is a public official or figure a plantiff seeking damages for distress must prove actual malice. Actual malice includes knowledge that the printed statements are false or circumstances showing a reckless disregard for whether they are true or not. If the plaintiff is not a public figure there is liability without malice.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first chapter focuses on slander cases within the Dutch settlement of New Amsterdam, where defamation was often grounds for court…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eposito Case

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. What is the most “jealously” protected kind of speech, according to the court in this case?…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the play, preserving one's reputation is a prevalent theme. I believe that the truth is more important than a good name. Some characters that are an example of preserving reputation are…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Esposito v. SFX

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    4. According to the case, why was this not defamation, and what tort did the court approve a filing for? (5 points)…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite the fact that one’s name is selected by somebody else and inevitably predetermines their fate , while they are living their life they can shape their name to try and conform their own values while also leaving it as a legacy once they are gone. Throughout Song of Solomon, the names of the characters help to disclose an immense amount about their personalities, as well, as how their monetary status creates their motivation, effects their decisions, and helps to form their legacy. Throughout the novel, many of the character’s names are chosen by someone else but still empower them to make the name, their own which helps to liberate them to indulge in a more prosperous life, rather than a life strictly focused on gaining a…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Hillsborough Disaster

    • 3606 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Defamation law has been most pronounced in the British media industry. While it has influences the media both in a positive and negative ways, journalists are now more cautious about what they write. On the other hand, celebrities and other public personalities are now very concerned of what is being written about them. For Instance, Geoldof Peaches sued the Daily Star tabloid for damages after the paper alleged that she practiced prostitution at night. Geldoff complained to Press Complain Commission about the allegations that had a potential of damaging her colourful career. The Daily Star publishers on their part agreed that their story on Geldof lacked accuracy and was damaging to her reputation[3].…

    • 3606 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Yes the grocery store many have violated the law of defamation if they do not have proof that the man was actually trying to steal. Until they have actual proof they cannot say that a person was stealing just because a person thought they saw him take something. Defamation is a statement that is not true that was made against another person to a third person that could tarnish a persons’ reputation. Defamation could be slander in oral or spoken form, and can also be libel which is written or broadcasted. Just because the employee saw Mr. Man pick up a few steaks, does not mean that he was going to try and steal them.…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Names In The Crucible

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “How may I live without my name? I have given you my soul; leave me my name!” Says the character John Proctor in Arthur Miller’s The Crucible. Probably the most powerful line the entire play, it is apparent that the idea of the importance of “names” is the central theme of this great classic.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Flynt V Falwell Summary

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages

    v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), ruled that a public figure may hold a speaker liable for the damage to reputation caused by publication of a defamatory falsehood, but only if the statement was made "with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not." This ad parody did not display actual malice, that is Hustler did not publish false facts in order to intentionally harm this man, also that no reasonable person could believe the facts of the ad to be true. Although the ad may have been distasteful and outrageous, according to the respondent, "Outrageousness" in the area of political and social discourse has an inherent subjectiveness about it which would allow a jury to impose liability on the basis of the jurors' tastes or views, or perhaps on the basis of their dislike of a particular expression. An "outrageousness" standard thus runs afoul of our longstanding refusal to allow damages to be awarded because the speech in question may have an adverse emotional impact on the audience. See NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co., 458 U.S. 886, 910 (1982) ("Speech does not lose its protected character . . . simply because it may embarrass others or coerce them into action"). Also, as stated in FCC v. Pacifica Foundation, 438 U.S. 726…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    what is crime

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages

    of a criminal case. If I slander somebody, I might be dragged into court, and I might have…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays