Preview

Definition Of Victory

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
516 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Definition Of Victory
Clausewitz defines victory as overcoming your opponent’s will to resist in order to force him to accept your geo-political position/policy. (CL 94) Clausewitz also correctly points out that both combatants define victory and peace. Even within the pure warfare, the defeated gets a vote. (CL 80) Bartholomees broaden the participants to include the perception of noncombatants. (Barth p 31) Both would agree unless the victor is considering a Carthage like solutions, defeated people can resist in attempts to undermine the battlefield result until the victor completely removes the means or willingness to resist. (Barth p 34)

Clausewitz also recognizes that graduations of victory and peace are determined by the combatants overall political/strategic objectives. (CL 94) If one combatant seeks the complete destruction of his opponent’s military and/or the occupation and subjection of their people, then victory and/or peace will be difficult to obtain and maintain. (CL 94) If the combatants are fighting over limited political objectives, (not considered survival interest by either) …show more content…
Consider the Athenians’ actions after their victory at Pylos. A humbled Sparta sued for peace. This peace would have secured the Athenian “war objectives”, but because of the damage inflicted on Attica by the Spartan Army, the Athenian leaders rejected the offer to pursue greater “war objectives”. This shift in objectives led Athens to ultimate humiliation and ruin. (Thucydides p 549)
Clausewitz’s thoughts on conflict termination should be in the forefront of all strategic planners when considering the use of war to achieve political ends. Without a clear vision of victory or peace a nation may amass a collection of worthless battlefield victories but no political gains. Both Germany, and sadly the United States, provide an excellent example of this
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Examples Of Clauseewitz's Paradoxical Trinity
    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Examples Of Clauseewitz's Paradoxical Trinity

    TITLE MAJ Evette Barnes, SG6A, AY 2017-18 November 2017, H100 Question: How does Clausewitz's paradoxical trinity explain the changes to the character of warfare from the methods used by Frederick the Great to those that followed in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries? Carl von Clausewitz defines the nature of war by identifying that which remains constant in all wars using his highly regarded paradoxical trinity ; meanwhile, he acknowledges war has, and will continue to change as the characteristics of warfare change but that the three aspects of the trinity (simplified as government, army, and people ) are constantly at play. It is the variables within the compelling relationships between: instruments…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Von Clausewitz: Similarities And Differences
    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Von Clausewitz: Similarities And Differences

    The way in which Clausewitz and Jomini essentially maintain the same principles of war but only differ in what they consider significant such as the idea of movements of armies, the significance of politics and total war principles. Jomini throughout his art of war has shown the importance of planning and strategic movement yet Clausewitz recognizes the significance of other factors of war that are hard to quantify, such as the fog of war, the politics involved in war and the need to be barbarous in…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Long Did Sparta Get Out Of Peloponnesian War
    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Long Did Sparta Get Out Of Peloponnesian War

    If there was one thing Sparta wanted out of the Peloponnesian War, it was to bring down Athens. Given Athens' rising strength and its ability to acquire an ever-larger navy of vessels from contributions paid by its dependents and allies, Sparta appeared to be concerned (Cartwright, 2018). As a matter of fact, Athens was becoming stronger and winning more and more wars thanks to its allies. Furthermore, Sparta believed that if nothing was done, Corinth, another major Greek state, was going to be forced to go along with Athens (Cartwright, 2018). When discussing ancient Greece, we frequently concentrate on Athens and Sparta, two of the principal towns.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    POL.355.Final.Paper
    • 2412 Words
    • 10 Pages

    POL.355.Final.Paper

    Just War Theory evolves from three ideas; jus ad bellum, jus in bello and jus post bellum. Jus ad bellum means justice for war, that is what the motive behind going into war is? This first part concentrates on the reasons why states use war as a means in which to achieve a justifiable end. Jus in bello means justice in war, deals with the means used in the actual war which is normally the soldiers’ responsibility. The last idea used in just war theory is Jus post bellum which means justice after war; this involves the consequences of war.…

    • 2412 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Michael Howard and the necessity of Studying War.
    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Michael Howard and the necessity of Studying War.

    Throughout the book, he has challenged preconceived notions that have made his book persuasive about the necessity of studying war, so as to go into greater detail about the debates that he has introduced the reader to. One such example is that ‘war is bad’. One might think, especially in context to liberals that wars should not be fought and nations should resolve all their disputes peacefully through arbitration. Howard has presented examples of when it is essential to fight in a war, for example when war is necessary for freedom. Another example is of liberal visionaries like the Italian, Mazzini, whose ideas of peace could manifest through what he thought to be a just war. In this case it had to be war to get rid of their oppressive Austrian rulers.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Clausewitz's Theory Of War
    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Clausewitz's Theory Of War

    Unsurprisingly, this statement generates criticism on applicability of Clausewitz’s theory with the increase of intra-state wars since the end of Cold War. For instance, H.P Willmott and Michael B. Barrett argued that Clausewitz’s theory is overly simplistic, and according to the Prussian, war has only one simple nature which is its subordination to policy and the theory lost its legacy as a result of absence of inter-state war since the first Gulf War. At first glance it might seem that war is inherently subservient to a government as it usually generates politics and directs policies. However, governments are not only policy makers and wage wars on another yet emergence of non-state actors brought change in the current security environment. In fact, Clausewitz had an answer to his critics if one read his book carefully. Essentially he said that “…..the feudal lords and trading cities of the Middle Ages, eighteenth-century kings and the rulers and peoples of the nineteenth century - all conducted war in their own particular way, using different methods and pursuing different aims”. It is therefore fair to assume that he was aware of other actors who would have different aims/policies than those of states. With regard to the ISIS, its main aim is to create Islamic caliphate and its actions against Iraqi and Syria governments, and against the West are continuation of its policies. Therefore, it is fair to say that Clausewitz’s hypothesis on war’s subordination to policy is still applicable while policy itself, in other word, war’s one of characters changing over time. War has been and would be always continuation of policy yet policy makers would decide to provoke it under their assumption of chance to succeed as…

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Athenians
    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The Athenians

    They also fell noticeably short of their own military ambitions and perceptions. They boasted that they were more than strong enough to hold their own and that their “diplomacy” of promising freedom for those who submitted to their rule could win over any hostile outsiders. Yet, in their attempted “negotiations” with the Melians, the Athenians essentially admitted they could not accept neutrality because they were afraid of looking weak in the eyes of their subjects. In a sense, the Athenians admitted their shortcomings right to their enemies’ faces. A stable empire with a truly strong military would not possess such a fear, at least not to the extent that its policies would revolve around that fear. Furthermore, the Melians pointed out that the Athenians’ rationale and strategy were fairly absurd: they should instead allow the Melians and others to remain neutral. By being aggressive conquerors, the Athenians will only create more bitterness, anger, and resentment among their subjects, and thus invite more hostility from their subjects and outsiders. The Athenians, letting their pride come first, rejected this argument and refused to consider the possibility of a friendly yet neutral…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dbq 1996
    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dbq 1996

    Success cannot be simply the battlefield it must also be the political equality of all. Otherwise a pyrrhic victory…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    My Brother Sam Is Dead
    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages

    My Brother Sam Is Dead

    War has been a constantly occurring event throughout history, from the strife between Homo sapien tribes to terrorists in modern society. However, what if there was some way to achieve the same ending without contentions of war? This is what who can be assumed as brothers and pacifists, James and Christopher Collier, are trying to tell us through their novel, My Brother Sam is Dead. The example they use is the American Revolution. So many people, innocent or evil, were killed. “My Brother Sam is Dead” takes us through these events using the perspective of Tim Meeker, a young boy that watches the war completely change his life. In my Brother Sam is Dead, although multiple sides are shown, authors Collier and Collier ultimately argue that war…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Society's Argumentative Essay: The Conflict Of War
    • 66 Words
    • 1 Page

    Society's Argumentative Essay: The Conflict Of War

    To conclude, there is no doubt that the conflict of war is a useless encounter that affects many innocent people’s lives, the economic stability and physiological wellbeing of soldiers. It is evident that in some circumstances society makes war to ensure peace, and on the surface this seems rational, even plausible. However, in reality throughout the journey there is a great human and economic cost…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Just And Unjust War Analysis
    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Just And Unjust War Analysis

    In this chapter, Walzer discusses the cruelty of war and whether there can be any justification for such cruelty. He begins by distinguishing between the justice of war (jus ad bellum) and the justice in war (jus in bello). "War is always judged twice, first with reference to the reasons states have for fighting, secondly with reference to the means they adopt." (p.21).…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Peloponnesian War Vs Athenian War
    • 2611 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Peloponnesian War Vs Athenian War

    In 480 and the years prior the Athenians and Spartans, banned together to defeat the Persian Army. The Spartans stand at Thermopylae, allowed the Athenians time to prepare, and ultimately allowed the victory. With both of these great city-states located so close together in Hellas, there differences would ultimately lead to dissension. Throughout the course of this paper, I hope to explain the reasoning behind the dissension between Sparta and Athens, made war between these former allies inevitable.…

    • 2611 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Classical Athens Vs Sparta
    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Classical Athens Vs Sparta

    By the middle of the 5th century B.C. Athens and Sparta, the two most powerful Greek city-states, found themselves on the brink of a full-scale war. According to Thucydides, at the beginning of the war both Athens and Sparta were at the pick of their might and flourishing and could trade and cooperate to each other’s benefit; instead, they got involved into an armed confrontation, in which the rest of the Greek cities participated, on one side or on the other.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Peace Of Westphalia And The Vietnam War
    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page

    Peace Of Westphalia And The Vietnam War

    In contrast with the days of Westphalia, two world superpowers fighting each other over who could gain more global influence is quite a significant change from the bare-bones delegation of the right to self-determination, and though all the prior laws of world order are supposed to apply to subsequent one, they are slightly twisted and worked-around in this iteration. In an examples such as the ideological fight for Vietnam or Korea, one could consider that the people of these nations had an independent decision to decide which alliance to side with, but it would quickly grow into a much larger conflict that held no regard for the objections to the sovereignless nation’s mutually assured destruction. The people of Vietnam were as much as the victims of the war as were the innocent families of Protestant and Catholic faith during the Thirty Years’ War; Which was agreed upon to never happen again post-Westphalia.…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Are There Any "Winners" in War?
    • 688 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Are There Any "Winners" in War?

    War is not a game people play to win prizes or gain recognition for their skill. After one side surrenders, and a treaty is signed, one side does go home feeling like a winner. Both sides suffer irreplaceable losses. For this reason, there are no true winners in war.…

    • 688 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics