Preview

Dembski's Argumentative Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
727 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dembski's Argumentative Analysis
We strengthen our autonomy by challenging beliefs in our lives, such as our belief in a higher being, God. By doing so, individuals can deduce whether the belief in God is ‘rational’ or not. For theists, the façade of their deduction is irrational due to their commitment of faith. Also, humans are fundamentally irrational because we select deductions that are based on irrational facts and reasons. Therefore, in this essay, I will argue that no rational person can believe in God. The belief in God is not rational because it requires faith. When there is a lack of evidence, faith suggests that the individual should commit to a belief by using their emotions or intuitions. Theologians use faith to form the ontological, cosmological, and design …show more content…
Dembski’s argument regarding “intelligent design.” His argument suggests that the complexity of life is extremely improbable in the universe, and implies that an intelligence must have produced life—not by chance or natural selection (Velasquez 246). Dembski does not consider the alternate universes/galaxies beyond our sight, as level 1 of the multiverse model suggests that a parallel universe is possible within the infinitely expanding space. You may propose that evidence of parallel universes is lacking, but similarly, there is no knowledge of how life is made. As a result, it is not rational to agree with either perspective, as both perspectives lack facts and reasons—evidence—necessary to establish ‘rationality.’
Some people may find it difficult to prove the rationality of God’s existence, so they may propose alternate conceptions: pantheism and panentheism. Both conceptions continue to assume that there must be a presence of a supernatural being—one that is beyond nature. Therefore, these theistic alternatives are irrational due to their lack of evidence.
Personally, I believe it is rational to remain indifferent, as it suggests that no conclusion is made; my conception has no premise for rationality, so it is neither rational nor
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of Swindal's Incompatibilist Model
    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analysis Of Swindal's Incompatibilist Model

    Swindal offers four models for the interaction of faith and reason. One of these models is particularly of interest here: the incompatibilist model. This model suggests, “…one can hold faith as transrational, inasmuch as it is higher than reason.” A second tier of this model is that faith can be irrational; hence, it is “not subject to rational evaluation at all” (Swindal, n.d., n.pag). The rationale behind having faith in God is that it binds together the common, or universal values and moral codes that are present in all cultures (Rachels, 1971, p. 621-22). Having said this, though, many who do have faith in God do not think that it requires any reasoning or any proof at all (Clark, n.d., n.pag.). In his discussion, though, Clark refers to…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Donald L. Niewyk's Argumentative Analysis
    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Donald L. Niewyk's Argumentative Analysis

    Donald L. Niewyk’s fifth and sixth chapters both deal more with outside perspectives and outside reactions than it does with those who were persecuted. The fifth chapter, “Bystander Reactions,” offers four different arguments as to why bystanders acted they way they did during the Holocaust. The sixth chapter, “Possibilities of Rescue,” discusses three different viewpoints on what foreign governments could have done to prevent the Holocaust. These two chapters conclude Niewyk’s book The Holocaust and wrap up the final sequence of events surrounding the Holocaust and the camps.…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    De Bry Argumentative Analysis
    • 74 Words
    • 1 Page

    De Bry Argumentative Analysis

    6: After seeing the images created by De Bry, my view of Las Casas has changed. When reading his account, I did believe what he said about the things he witnessed, but I still questioned his documentation since there were lack of other testimonies in his letter. The art De Bry created was based off numerous accounts by dispersed people across numerous locations. This helps give me proof that Las Casas’ descriptions are…

    • 74 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    David Sze Argumentative Analysis
    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages

    David Sze Argumentative Analysis

    David Sze (July 7, 2015) posted a column in the Huffington Post entitled, “Money and Happiness? It’s Complicated.” As the title suggests, Sze discusses the link between having money and finding happiness, or “life satisfaction.” He approaches the issue from a post-modern perspective without considering any transcendent categories to evaluate the issue. Leaving a theistic perspective out, Sze struggles to find an adequate explanation for meaning, happiness and satisfaction in life.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Sabinsky's Argumentative Analysis
    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sabinsky's Argumentative Analysis

    The technical aspects of losing weight such as regularly going to the gym and eating a strict diet is a tedious process that may be a motivator to NOT lose weight. We’ve already established that many people struggling with their weight do not feel happy in their bodies, but the act of losing that weight may never even happen. According to Sabinsky’s study on men, he discovered men “perceive too many barriers towards weight reduction” (Sabinsky). Sabinsky identifies that participants’ perceptions of necessary dietary change implied a potential loss of masculinity (Sabinsky). The sense of masculinity trumps the need to enhance their bodies and men would risk body weight and appearance for their dignity. This can explain why it’s noticable that…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Mccloskey Argumentative Analysis
    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Mccloskey Argumentative Analysis

    It goes without question, that human beings will always question the existence of “God”. Whether these questions are formed in support or denial of an omnipresent creator they are important in helping shape our morality. H J McCloskey and his article “On Being and Atheist” is very critical of theists. It thus presents several arguments on how believers are incorrect in their belief in “God”, cosmological and teleological. McCloskey also focus’s on the existence of evil and how one can find comfort in atheism when facing evil.…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pyrrhonian Argumentative Analysis
    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pyrrhonian Argumentative Analysis

    The method of skeptical inquiry or way by which Pyrrhonian skeptics bring themselves to withhold assent to every non evident proposition is known as the modes of suspension of judgment. There are five such modes that Sextus provides and they are based on: Discrepancy, regress ad infinitum, relativity, hypothesis and circular reasoning. (Empiricus, 165–169) The modes are designed to assist Pyrrhonian skeptics in in continuing their inquiry by guarding themselves from the disquieting state of dogmatism. For the sake of argument, suppose there is a dogmatist who believes that P. In order to avoid the snares of dogmatism, the Pyrrhonian skeptic would resort to withhold assent about P. According to the mode deriving from discrepancy, due to an undecidable…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Railton's Argumentative Analysis
    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Railton's Argumentative Analysis

    According to Peter Railton we should feel uneasy when fact/value distinction is similar to objectivity/subjectivity and reason/emotion. If we stop viewing fact and value as distinct the facts may be softened while the values may be hardened. Railton is concerned with generic/non-moral goodness or intrinsic value. The philosophical defense of fact/value distinction consists of the arguments from rational determinability, internalism, and the argument from “queer-ness.” Rational determinability are factual disputes that can be resolved by appealing to reason and experience, but facts are hard. Internalism and instrumentalism supports the fact and value distinction. Thinking of goodness can be similarly relative to “nutritiveness,” that all organisms require nutrition but do not utilize the same nutrients. There is no absolute nutrient, meaning that there is no such thing as something being nutritious for all organisms, there is only relational nutritiveness. Railton also believes that someone being good involves what he or she would want for themselves while being free of “cognitive error or lapses of instrumental rationality.” The argument from queerness (which concerns the nature of reality), provides that human motivational system and situations support counterfactuals to characterize intrinsic goodness. Determinates are factors that influence desires we form and how such desires will evolve In response to many changes including one’s own belief, however an actual individual’s beliefs will fall short of expressing full information. Naturalness consists facts about a given person’s “psychology, physiology, and circumstances that are reduction basis” of his or her dispositions to desire. One’s own good can play a role in evolution in their own behavior even without forming an accurate idea of…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Teleological Argumentative Analysis
    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Teleological Argumentative Analysis

    Throughout the course of time, many philosophers, dogmatic religions and even individual human beings themselves have tried to prove the existence of God. The recurrent question that constantly arises is whether or not you can prove the existence of God solely by rational thinking alone. To that, the answer is no. It is not possible to prove the existence of God solely by rational thinking as you also need to incorporate aspects of faith, but rational thinking helps solidify your beliefs pertaining to God and leaves the answers we cannot conceive rationally up to faith. You cannot understand something outside of your existence rationally because you cannot experience it or see it; you can only theorize, believe and trust in it. You will never be able to reason what you have no knowledge of. In this essay, I will argue that in…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Teleological Argument
    • 2343 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Teleological Argument

    Some theists of the Abrahamic persuasion claim that the harmony of the universe is proof of an intelligent designer. This argument is known as the teleological argument and has evolved from classical philosophy to modern theology. In addition, subscribers of the Abrahamic religions also hold that God has attributes that include omniscience, omnipotence, and benevolence. Fundamentally, God is all knowing, all-powerful, and all good. In contrast, God created a perfect universe that is in harmony, but occasionally practices miracles. Can the teleological argument, miracles, and God’s attributes coexist in a rational universe? This essay’s goal is…

    • 2343 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explaining the Validty of God's Existence
    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explaining the Validty of God's Existence

    I believe that when we start believing in God is from birth. We are taught about god from day one until the day we die. My belief and I tell everybody that will listen to me that God is for real he created us and he takes care of us throughout our lives. When we start going to church at a young age and start to learn more about the bible we gather information on what God has done for us. This gains knowledge on what we are taught and gives us the facts of his existence and we should spread the word to people that did not have the privilege of going to church at the young age. These are the people that are hard to get to believe because they do not have the knowledge of God. The first question I will ask them is tell my why you do not believe in god. Their answer is usually no one has ever seen him. And my response is who do you think created us. This question usually makes them to stop and think for a minute and they seem to believe me more and more.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Pascal's Argument For The Existence Of God
    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Pascal's Argument For The Existence Of God

    The God that is real might not even care that people don’t want to believe in it when they use more logical reasons. Rationality is having a custom to act by reason or in an agreement with the fact of…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Epistomplogy
    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Epistomplogy

    Rationalism is much like common sense in the sense of mathematically speaking 2+2=4, when one holds up two fingers then another two fingers it is clearly shown 2+2=4. Mathematical reasoning leads one in an orderly way from what one knows to what one does not know but discovers. It is a pattern of a sequence such as a series of events. Descartes was a mathematician who searched for rational doubt, intuition was first needed then followed by deductive, intuition is used to gain some sense of reality such as Desecrates most famous saying “Cogito ergo sum” , “I think, therefore I am”. The truth cannot be argued because each time is true, even when doubting and thinking you are still thinking and therefore we are beings. And then after, by using deduction, it would be easier to be able to tell the truth by asking questions eliminating nothing but the truth.…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    On Being an Atheist Essay Example
    • 1851 Words
    • 8 Pages

    On Being an Atheist Essay Example

    In 1968, H.J. McCloskey wrote an article on atheism called “On Being an Atheist.” He states that there are three proofs which do seem to move ordinary theists to their theism to constitute major motivations towards a belief in God, namely the cosmological proof, the teleological proof, and the argument from design (McCloskey). In his article he states that these proofs are inadequate, and that atheism is much more comfortable than theism. He also says that most theists don’t come to the belief in God through as a reflection on the proofs, but they come to a belief in God through others reasons and factors. Through our faith as theists we believe God exists and that the existence of God is the best explanation for the effects we observe in the universe. Philosophers say that an argument is a set of statements or propositions, which are premises, which show that another statement, the conclusion, is true. Throughout this paper I will mention the premises and conclusions of each argument and explain why McCloskey is incorrect when trying to prove his arguments.…

    • 1851 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Philosophy (the Existence of God)
    • 1586 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Philosophy (the Existence of God)

    In my essay I decided to take on the second and third topics. I’ll first address and examine Anselm’s ontological argument for the existence of God while restating and critically examining Aquinas’s first argument for the existence of God. After I finish with that topic I will then take on Paley and his argument and whether or not it thoroughly proves the existence of God conceived as a supremely perfect being and why or why not this is. During this topic I will bring in Dawkins’ and Hume’s criticisms of the argument also I will try to differentiate between Aquinas’ fifth cosmological argument from the eighteenth-century deistic version of Paley and whether or not it succeeds against Dawkins and why or why not this is.…

    • 1586 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics