Preview

Democracy Vs Republicanism

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
381 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Democracy Vs Republicanism
In 1776, our Founding Fathers were fighting for everything that is now stated in the Declaration of Independence. Without them, there would be no Democracy today and who knows how society would be if they did not shape the nation. The Founders felt it was essential to state in the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution that citizens should have “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness”. For centuries the freedom and Independence they created for generations to come has been celebrated. Does society understand that the Creators have a deeper meaning than freedom and independence that is celebrated each year on the Fourth of July? However what did the Founders mean when they say “secure the blessings of the Liberty?” In the Preamble when our …show more content…
Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence with ideas based on John Locke's ideas from “The second Treatise on Government.” He said that people create government to defend human rights. The Founders did not imagine one nation, but more of an Oligarchy. The Republicanism theory root the idea of Democracy because today our Democracy has adopted some of their beliefs and have similarities. Both the Republicanism theory and the idea of Democracy's government are based on popular consent. The ideal Democracy's government does what the people want them to do and in the eighteenth century when the Framers beliefs are off of Republicanism. They feared that if the people were too active, it may take a wrong turn causing negative feedback, so the Founders wanted limited government.
In the end, the Creators that shaped the nation today wanted to secure our freedom from any form of government that would attempt to strip the people from their human rights. The political culture which the Founder had been a Republicanism Theory and it was the opposite from a Democracy. Those core-beliefs the Framers had adopted into today's ideal Democracy and brought more of a broad

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    govt 2306

    • 2484 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The framers vivly remembered the censorship and suppression of speech that they had suffered under British rule. The framer understandably viewed liberty as a central principal guiding the creation of a new democratic republic. The freedoms embodied on the bill of rights are broad principals rather than specific probations against gov. actions. For the nations beginnings the vagueness of the bill of rights led to serious disagreements about how to interoperate its amendments. The framers intended the bill of rights to restrict the powers only of the national gov. before the civil war the bill of rights was not amicable to the states.…

    • 2484 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jeffersonian Democracy, named after its leading advocate Thomas Jefferson, is a term used to describe one of two dominant political outlooks and movements in the United States from the 1790’s to the 1820s. The term was commonly used to refer to the Democratic-Republican Party which Jefferson founded in opposition to the Federalist Party of Alexander Hamilton.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Freedom is a major concept in the founding of America. The original thirteen colonies were founded by England, and many British citizens moved to the colonies for freedom. After the French and Indian war was over the king of England still sent more troops and it made the colonists feel uncomfortable and they got a feeling that the king of England was oppressing on the freedoms that they seeked in the New World. This was the start of the Revolutionary war. The Revolutionary war was a war fought for the Colonies Independence from Britain. After the Revolutionary war the colonies became the United States of America, The Articles of Confederation were written so that the United States would not be under the rule of corruption or tyranny as they had experience with the king of England.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    For years Americans have thrived off the idea of originality and independence but, they weren’t the first ones to come up with these ideas. The US Government has become a blend of many European influences, keeping the good ideas and leaving the bad ones out, in order to create a “perfect” system. Americans wanted a new government, because of the flaws in the Articles of Confederation, their current system. The Articles of Confederation did not give the right to the national government to tax, to create a national currency, and there was no executive branch. Although most people wanted that at the time, they began to realize this was just not working. So, James Madison, a Democratic Republican, wrote the US Constitution, which is still used…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    To understand the similarities and differences between ‘republicanism’ and the democratic ideal, you must first understand some basic vocabulary. Republicanism was defined by John Adams as, “ A government, in which all men, rich and poor magistrates and subjects officers and people, masters and servants, the first citizen and the last, are equally subject to the laws.” Meaning that republicanism is not about the people having power, but about the power that people are under. Democracy is a form of government that says each person in the society gets an equal contribution and say in the decisions that are made that affect their lives and wellbeing. There are two forms of democracy. One is direct democracy which means that citizens get to directly participate in decision making (this works much better in small societies such as town meetings). The other form is representative democracy, which gives the people the right to vote on who they want to represent them and their ideas in the decision making processes (this works for large societies where it is unreasonable that every single person would get their individual voice heard).…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law studies

    • 314 Words
    • 1 Page

    The constitution uses philosophers ideas during the Enlightenment era. Jefferson shaped the country by solidifying the ideas of natural rights in term of government and religion. Locke was asserting that government had to be fair and equitable in order to be sustainable.…

    • 314 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    liberty is being free within a society from oppressive restrictions imposed by an authority which helps protect us as humans. An example being on the constitution, being the right to bare arms. That said, liberty is shown because it allows a citizen o have a gun inside his home. But it limits to only a certain use. The reason behind as to why our founding fathers have liberty as one of the original intentions is to make sure we have freedom but not having the authority to abuse it, because freedom is under no one's law and liberty is being able to protect freedom from freedom, basically protecting us from doing inhuman actions. Furthermore our fathers wanted liberty since the start, in order to maintain order within our people and create peace instead of wars. Another document as to where it shows liberty is the bill of right, Amendment IV because it limits the actions of our authority. Which clearly signifies how our authority can have freedom as to committing arrest but can’t search a house or person without a warrant. Which demonstrates how our founding fathers wanted to make sure that “each man's home is his castle”, in other words, no one should be able to go through his personal items without permission or warrant. Signifying how liberty has been a major part in our society and country and has been with us since the start of this country,in order to help create…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our national government, in my opinion, was structured by following the writings of Montesquieu. Montesquieu wrote that leaders could not be trusted to always do what was right for the people and that govenment should be structured to keep the leaders of the government from acting in a selfish manner and passing laws that would help a select few instead of the majority of the people. That is exactly the way our Founding Fathers thought when they were writing the Constitution.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Over past centuries there have been many different opinions, philosophies and approaches to government and politics demonstrated throughout the world. As time continues and humanity evolves, these approaches and opinions often change, yet their root philosophy, or ideological foundations, often remain. A political ideology can be defined as, “ a science of ideas: the study of the origins, evolution and nature of ideas… the application of human reason to economic, social and political changes”[1]. This notion of a classic ideology influencing modern government is not an exception for that of the United States. Through the study of the “Father of the Constitution,”[2] James Madison, it is most evident that this document he created was shaped around an ideology greatly influenced by classical political philosopher, John Locke. Madison incorporates Lockean philosophies of natural law and role of government with a democratized systematic approach, thus establishing a Constitution largely based upon the ideology of the Neoclassical Liberal Democratic Theory. The influence of this ideology is evident within three fundamental aspects of the American Constitution: the division of powers and federalism, the notion of checks and balances, and the process of the judicial review. Locke’s natural law supports the notion that individual freedom is an essential right, while his opinion of the role of government, in its most vital duty, is to serve, represent and protect the people. Madison, however, did not agree with Locke’s vision of human nature, denying his opinion in that humanity is generally good. Conversely, Madison did not trust the public, understanding human nature to be selfish, aggressive and unchangeable. Still, such as in Locke’s natural law, Madison believed that people had the right to some sort of self government and therefore aspired to create a government, “… guided by an enlightened and benevolent elected aristocracy, that would protect the interests of the…

    • 2665 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Liberalism vs. Democracy

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In writing the Constitution the founding fathers attempted to synthesize the calls of the Declaration of Independence—ideas of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness—to protect individual rights with the desires of democracy to develop collective self-government. The intricate system of checks and balances was designed for the purpose of preserving this sense of equilibrium between liberalism and democracy; however, as the nation has matured—through refoundings and periods of crisis—this stability has often vacillated. Today, Milkis and Landy suggest that the public faces distinctive challenges in balancing liberalism and democracy resulting from a new sense of factionalism and a growth in the administrative state. These challenges have manifested themselves through the political culture, the evolved and competitive roles of institutions to protect individual liberties, and through the impacts of crisis situations; American history has been a narrative describing how these forces and institutions have abetted the competition between liberalism and democracy. New factionalism and the growth of the administrative state have tipped the scales in favor of liberalism to the point where Milkis and Landy question if we have lost our ability to conduct democracy. Although an increased awareness of individual rights hinders collective self-government, it does not erase the fundamental principles that maintain a proper balance between liberalism and democracy. As the events of 9/11 have demonstrated, democratic principles still play an integral role in protecting the common good.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Authoritarian Versus Democracy, what’s the difference? In an Authoritarian Democracy there is only one ruler or a small group of rulers as The democracy in the U.S. has a president and a congress to go through before the law is made final. An Authoritarian government has only one Leader, known as a king/Queen that inherits the title of King/Queen or takes it over by force. In Our Democracy we as a whole elect our “leader” known as a president, as of now it’s Donald Trump.…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democracy vs Dictatorship

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In a democratic form of government the ultimate power lies in the hands of the people and they play a very important role in the governing process. It is a government which is based on the consent of the people, while a dictatorial government is a government by one man or a group of persons who acquire power either through force or by force and consent both. In a dictatorship, power is exercised in an arbitrary manner.In a democratic government, people elect their representatives and every person enjoys equal political rights; in a dictatorial form of government the head of the state is not elected.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freedom vs. Democracy

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is not a recent suggestion to say that freedom and democracy seem to be in conflict. The many different ways freedom and democracy seem disagree vary from person to person. In my role as a citizen I see these conflicts in everyday life through my family life, school, and the technology.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Political Genesis of Constitution Presented By: April E. Brizuela BSIT The government during the Pre-Spanish period was primarily founded on a barangay form of government where the DATU or RAJAJ acted as a leader and administrator .The DATU possessed the essential qualification of superior intelligence ,strength , influence and wealth . His responsibilities were attuned to maintaining peace and order , community organization and executor of the justice system.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Democracy vs Dictatorship

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dictatorship and democracy are two concepts with numerous views and differences. The first is not ideal for a society which seeks free press, human rights and equality. The second is, even though many facets have to be taken into account. Throughout history, scholars have laid out a range of arguments regarding the advantages and disadvantages of both systems in terms of development. Here, we will try to enumerate some of them.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays