Preview

Descartes Fourth Meditation Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
239 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Descartes Fourth Meditation Summary
In the Fourth Meditation, "Truth and falsity," Descartes elucidates his understanding that he is somewhere between God – perfection – and nothingness. However, if God is a perfect creator He should carry the ability to construct faultless beings. To this, Descartes states that God’s aims and motives are inconceivable to finite beings. Thus, Descartes embarks on a search for the cause of his errors. He begins with intellect and claims that it cannot be the source of his errors as intellect limits an individual’s ability to judge ideas. However, Descartes understands that he is unlimited in freedom of choice (the will) and in this regard most closely resembles God. Nevertheless, God has the ultimate will as He has absolute knowledge and carries
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Descartes Meditation 1 Summary
    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Descartes Meditation 1 Summary

    Throughout Meditation One in The Meditation of the First Philosophy, Descartes reflects on a number of falsehoods he has believed throughout his life. He does this to create a system in order to clarify whether they are true or false, so that he can build a basic structure from which future knowledge can be based. This approach is called Method of Doubt. Doubt is defined as a feeling of uncertainty. Descartes opens Mediation One by stating that if he wants to establish information that is firm and lasting in the sciences, he would have to begin from the earliest foundations from which his current knowledge has been built upon. He establishes that the task includes breaking down the components that make up his general knowledge.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Trademark Argument Of René Descartes Meditations On First Philosophy
    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Trademark Argument Of René Descartes Meditations On First Philosophy

    If he had not reached the metaphysical certainty of the self, it is likely that he would not be able to find any metaphysical certainty at all, including that of God’s existence. From this, Descartes then moves on to go about proving the existence of an omnipotent, omnibenevolent, infinite, omniscient God. Before discussing Descartes’s proof of God’s existence, it is important to first discuss ideas, substances, and their realities. According to Descartes, ideas are formed in the human mind in three ways. Ideas are either experienced or perceived in the world, they have been created or invented, or they have been derived from one’s own nature.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Rethinking the Cartesian Circle in Descartes' Meditation 5
    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Rethinking the Cartesian Circle in Descartes' Meditation 5

    Other than the Cogito stating ‘so long as I continue to think I am something,’ which was determined to be a first principle in the First Meditations, another self-evident truth arises in the beginning of the Third Meditation that is a crucial antecedent for Descartes’ belief system regarding the existence of God. This first principle explicitly states that everything Descartes’ thinking being clearly and distinctly perceives is true. A few other important claims are made in the Third Mediation that are especially relevant to the Fifth Mediations, such as the claim that ideas considered alone in their own right cannot be outwardly false. Accounting for intuitive error, Descartes elaborates that even though ideas might have proceeded from things outside him, it does not follow that these ideas must resemble those outside things. An idea for a substance however, or something that exists in itself, has a greater objective reality than ideas without a substance, because it is more clear and distinct. It is from this foundation that Descartes’ idea of God is defined as, “a certain substance that is infinite, independent, supremely intelligent and supremely powerful.”…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Was God Important to Descartes?
    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Why Was God Important to Descartes?

    This gives an insight into why Descartes relies so heavily on the God in his meditations. It seems he uses God to support his meditations and uses God as a solution to his philosophy of doubt. God is vital as he is the answer to Descartes’ most complex ideas on doubt and enables him to preach God’s ability to relieve us of doubt but further more he want to reveal to us that God is the reason for all matter , for our…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Fourth Meditation Of Descartes Analysis
    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Fourth Meditation Of Descartes Analysis

    The essence of the main argument in the fourth Meditation of Descartes is to establish that there is a difference between God: his creator and himself, and how this difference does not taint the infinite abilities of God. Descartes commences his argument by first establishing his idea of being a thinking being. In his previous book, The Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy he sates,…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Descartes: Meditation Iii Summary Essay
    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Descartes: Meditation Iii Summary Essay

    In Descartes’s Meditations III, the Meditator describes his idea of God as "a substance that is infinite, eternal, immutable, independent, supremely intelligent, supremely powerful, and which created both myself and everything else."(70) Thus, due to his opinion in regards to the idea of God, the Meditator views God containing a far more objective reality than a formal one. Due to the idea that of God being unable to have originated in himself, he ultimately decides that God must be the cause of the idea, therefore he exists. The meditator defines God as such, “by ‘God’ I mean the very being the idea of whom is within me, that is, the possessor of all the perfections which I cannot grasp, but can somehow reach in my thought, which subject no defects whatsoever.” (70)…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Response Paper of Meditation Four, Five, and Six
    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Response Paper of Meditation Four, Five, and Six

    Descartes talked about the true and the false, and how we make mistakes in Meditation Four. Descartes believed that error as such is not something real that depends upon God, but rather is merely a defect. And thus there is no need to account for my errors by positing a faculty given to me by God for this purpose(546). He thought that the reason why we make mistakes is that the faculty of judging the truth, which we got from God, is not infinite(546). When Descartes focused more closely on more closely on himself and inquired into the nature of his errors, he noted that errors depend on the simultaneous concurrence of two causes: intellect and will(547). He didn’t believe that God ought to have given us a greater faculty of knowing than he did(547). So we cannot make no mistakes like God. Then Descartes raised a question that can he complain that the will or free choice he have received from God is insufficiently ample or perfect(547). After using paragraphs talking about it, Descartes perceived that the power of willing is not the cause of his errors, for it is most ample as well as perfect in its kind(548). This idea is similar to Augustine’s ides in On Free Choice of the Will. Then he thought if he held off from making a judgment when he do not perceive what is true with sufficient clarity and distinctness, it is cleat that he was acting properly and not committing an error(548). In the end, he said he would indeed attain it if only he paid enough attention to all the things that he perfectly understand, and separate them off from the rest, which he apprehended more confusedly and more obscurely(549).…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Descartes Systematic Doubt In Meditations On First Philosophy
    • 3392 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Descartes Systematic Doubt In Meditations On First Philosophy

    In this sense, God is perfect, and would never allow deception and error to take place because they are imperfect and God consists only of perfect qualities. God would not allow one to be deceived because he is supremely good, therefore deception and error must be a result of another source. He says that if his origin is from something other than God, he could have easily created him so that he makes mistakes and until he finds his origin doubt is going to occue. Descartes supposes that God is just a tale so he says let us just fraction him out of the equation entirely. Descartes decides that he is just going to doubt everything based on two principles. The first being that everything should be doubted at some point by those who seek the truth and the second being that things that are considered doubtful should be treated as if they are false. With that in mind he concludes that he does exist even against all doubts because the Evil Genius can never say that Descartes is non-existent because he thinks he is something therefore he must be. I think, therefore I…

    • 3392 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Meditation 1 Analysis
    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Descartes Meditation 1 Analysis

    God is the next doubt that Descartes brings to attention. He says that he is constantly deceived and God must have created him to be subject to this occasional deception. This doubt is quickly dispersed however when Descartes reasons that God is good and therefore would not deceive him because that would be contrary to his goodness.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Descartes: Proofs of God/Deception and Error
    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Descartes: Proofs of God/Deception and Error

    Cited: Descartes, R, Murdoch, D. & Cottingham, and J. Descartes: selected philosophical writings Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes Second Meditation
    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page

    Descartes Second Meditation

    In the second meditation Descartes discusses analyzing a fresh piece of wax examining its physical attributes “... it still tastes of honey and has the scent of the flowers from which the honey was gathered; its colour, shape and size are plain to see; it is hard, cold and can be handled easily…” (Descartes). He then imagine it placed within a fire noticing all its physical attributes change the wax loses its fragrance, colour, and shape; it now has become soft, warm and cannot be easily handled. However, Descartes is still able to identify it as wax. Even though his sight would perceive the wax as a completely different substance if it completely liquified it could be mistaken for some type of oil or even water. The assumption would remain…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rene Descartes First Meditation Summary
    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rene Descartes First Meditation Summary

    René Descartes begins his first meditation by calling all our current beliefs to suspicion. His purpose of this practice was to stripe away all the falsehoods that we have acquired since childhood by the use of our senses. He also wanted to build anew a stable foundation of beliefs that he can be certain are of undeniably truths.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Arguments For The Existence Of God
    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Descartes Arguments For The Existence Of God

    He starts with the idea of a God who is eternal, infinite, and perfect. In the beginning of Meditations on First Philosophy, He explains that “we must believe that there is a God, because we are so taught in the Holy Scriptures, and, on the other hand, that we must believe the Holy Scriptures because they come from God “(Descartes 1). He then doubts himself if god does really exist. Through examining his thoughts, he ends up believing that the idea of God exists because of his innate idea of God which has to be God who “is the cause of this idea”(Descartes 25). Descartes then explains more in depth saying, “I have no choice but to conclude that the mere fact of my existing is and of there being in me an idea of a most perfect being, that is God, demonstrates most evidently that God too exists” (34). Another reason is how in his further mediations, he explains how if God does not exist, then he is not a supremely perfect being. Saying that God does not exist, we can imagine a being that is more perfect than God. But this is a contradiction because since the idea of God is the idea of the most perfect being of all. Therefore, God must exist because you cannot image a more perfect being than god, who he is the almighty and perfect of…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Beliefs
    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Descartes Beliefs

    The most important part of Descartes’ knowledge was that he understood that God should not be to blame for the mistakes that we make in our lives. According to Descartes’, God has a plan for us, but he gave us freewill so that we have the ability to do whatever it is that we want to do. However, this can be a disadvantage to us at times because, unlike God, we don’t understand everything and make mistakes. Descartes knows that God would not deceive him, because Descartes defines that will to deceive as a sign of weakness, and God’s perfection would not allow him to be weak or act maliciously towards another. He also believes that if God created him, then God is responsible for him, which means that Descartes’ judgment would be perfect if only he used it correctly.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Descartes Arguments For The Existence Of God
    • 2680 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Descartes Arguments For The Existence Of God

    The logic behind Descartes’ second premise can be explained thus, he says a cold object such as a pot of water cannot become hot unless something else causes that heat. But, the cause must have a high degree as the effect. For it is impossible for one level of reality (the boiling water) to be produced by a cause that is less than the effect (a cold stove). Just as heated water is an effect that requires a cause, so Descartes’ idea of an infinite and perfect being is an effect or a phenomenon that needs to be accounted for. It is possible that Descartes could have produced the idea of God himself. But for him, a finite object can only produce another finite object. Hence, Descartes says ordinarily, the idea in his mind does not tell him if there is the existence of any external reality. However, the idea of perfection is unique. If he could not have manufactured it himself, then it will necessarily follow that he is not alone in the world, but that some other thing which is the cause of this idea exist. That thing can only be God therefore, God…

    • 2680 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More

Related Topics