Determination of the Earth’s Magnetic Field Configuration by Using Bar Magnets and Iron Filings and Measurement of Its Intensity with Tangent Galvanometer
Page 1 of 2 Staple this form to the manuscript that you reviewed. These two are to be submitted with the final version. Reviewer’s Code Name: Phenylalanine ^_^ Section: U-3L Date: September 12, 2012 Title of Paper Reviewed: Determination of the Earth’s Magnetic Field Configuration by using Bar Magnets and Iron Filings and Measurement of its Intensity with Tangent Galvanometer Author(s) Code Name: Shiela Grace V. Ramirez and Aurea Ellaine S. Mallari
Here are some reminders of some rules and guidelines you should follow when reviewing:
1. Be respectful and considerate of the writer 's feelings. Offer suggestions, not commands.
2. Raise questions from a reader 's point of view, points that may not have occurred to the writer.
3. Phrase comments clearly and carefully so that the writer can easily understand what needs to be improved.
4. Make sure comments are constructive and specific (not "This paper is confusing. It keeps saying the same things over and over again" but rather "It sounds like paragraph five makes the same point as paragraphs 2 and 3.").
5. Read the draft all the way through before you begin to comment on it. Give yourself enough time to read and respond.
6. Be considerate when discussing areas for improvement. Point out the strengths of the draft. Offer appropriate, constructive comments from a reader 's point of view.
7. Make sure your suggestions are reasonable (e.g., don 't suggest that they totally rewrite the paper because you didn 't agree with the author 's point of view or didn’t like the topic).
8. Before returning the paper with your comments/review, reread your comments to make sure they are clear and make sense.
9. Check if you have completely filled up this form especially the rating (except for the portion reserve for the author).
General format
Is the manuscript printed in short bond paper with 1-inch margin on all sides? Yes.
Is the title 14pt Times New Roman, bold and centered? Yes.
Here are some reminders of some rules and guidelines you should follow when reviewing:
1. Be respectful and considerate of the writer 's feelings. Offer suggestions, not commands.
2. Raise questions from a reader 's point of view, points that may not have occurred to the writer.
3. Phrase comments clearly and carefully so that the writer can easily understand what needs to be improved.
4. Make sure comments are constructive and specific (not "This paper is confusing. It keeps saying the same things over and over again" but rather "It sounds like paragraph five makes the same point as paragraphs 2 and 3.").
5. Read the draft all the way through before you begin to comment on it. Give yourself enough time to read and respond.
6. Be considerate when discussing areas for improvement. Point out the strengths of the draft. Offer appropriate, constructive comments from a reader 's point of view.
7. Make sure your suggestions are reasonable (e.g., don 't suggest that they totally rewrite the paper because you didn 't agree with the author 's point of view or didn’t like the topic).
8. Before returning the paper with your comments/review, reread your comments to make sure they are clear and make sense.
9. Check if you have completely filled up this form especially the rating (except for the portion reserve for the author).
General format
Is the manuscript printed in short bond paper with 1-inch margin on all sides? Yes.
Is the title 14pt Times New Roman, bold and centered? Yes.
References: Are references listed in the prescribed format? Yes. IMPORTANT: Rate this manuscript (1st draft) 7 ^_^ [Nine (9) = highest; One (1) = lowest] another IMPORTANT: Go back and accomplish the Abstract portion.) *************************************************************************************This portion is to be accomplished by the authors during revision: Were all the questions in this review form answered by the reviewer? What specific reminders listed above (give the number) which you think the reviewer did not observe, if any? Give a specific positive comment you can give about this review: Give a short summary of your actions/response to the review: IMPORTANT: Rate how helpful is this review. ___________. [Nine (9) = highest; One (1) = lowest]