Preview

Developing Grand Strategies

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
788 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Developing Grand Strategies
Abstract In this paper, we analyze lessons learned from the "Developing Grand Strategies" simulation relative to the importance and effectiveness of strategy formulation and choice. We also discuss about the concepts and analytic tools we can use in the development of our strategic plan. Finally, we discuss the challenges facing strategic planners.
What are lessons learned relative to the importance and effectiveness of strategy formulation and choice? We have learnt that the appropriate Grand strategies need to be selected based on the firm's quadrant positioning in the Grand strategy cluster. We also have learnt that a firm's quadrant position is identified using its competitive position and the market's growth capability. The firm's competitive position can be identified using a SWOT matrix and industry report. The industry report also can reveal whether the market is a slow growth or rapid growth market. The selected Grand Strategies based on the firm's quadrant positioning should help in selecting the correct action plan towards meeting the firm's goals. If the strategies are incorrect, the firm's action plans may not be accurate and may not help the firm meeting its goals. As an example in the simulation, Oz! was in quadrant II in Year 2. Oz! needed to achieve a profit margin of 13.5 percent and move back to quadrant I. Oz! opted to start an online channel and acquire a digital toys and games company which are the result of selecting horizontal integration and reformulation of concentrated growth as the strategies appropriate to quadrant II.
Concepts and analytic tools which can be used to build the strategic plan
Concepts
We have found that the Grand Strategy Cluster is the ideal platform for the selection of appropriate Grand Strategy. If the firm is in Quadrant I of the Grand Strategy cluster (strong competitive position and rapid market growth), the firm can be considered to be in a very good strategic position. In this situation, the firm can

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Str-581 Week 4

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Distinguishing one 's firm from the alternatives is a major concern for any business. Strategic analysis provides the starting point in the strategic management process organizations use to evaluate and choose the competitive advantages that distinguish them from other organizations within the market. Dominating businesses should also "choose among alternative grand strategies to guide the firm 's activities, particularly when they are trying to decide about broadening the scope of the firm 's activities beyond its core business (Robinson & Pearce, 2009)."…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Phi 410 Study Guide

    • 4150 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Broadly, the course is intended to examine in greater depth aspects of strategy analysis, strategy formulation, implementation and evaluation and to specifically:…

    • 4150 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    An essential part of corporate strategy is choosing the right portfolio of business to compete in especially when it concerns growth strategy and over the years this has become one of the key challenges faced by managers. It is highly imperative for business leaders to understand the different strategic options suitable for operating in various types of industries or markets. Suffice is to say that the business environment, which includes the competitive activity also plays a deep-seated role in deciding which strategic choice is most appropriate for the company or firm.…

    • 2418 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Pearce and Robinson (2013), Grand strategies are a means by which objectives can be achieved. There are a total of 15 different grand strategies that can be utilized but for the purpose of this paper, I will only focus on a few.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Academy of Management Executive , 9 (3), 45-57. Grant, R. M. (2010). Contemporary Strategy Analysis. London: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Lynch, R. (2003). Corporate Strategy (Third Edition ed.). New York: Prentice Hall Financial Times. McGahan, A. M. (2004). How Industries Change. Harvard Business Review , 82 (10), 86-94. Miller, D. (1986). Configurations of strategy and structure: Towards a synthesis. Strategic Management Journal , 7 (3), 233-249. Osgeowitsch, T., & Goelz, M. (2011). ALDI in Australia. University of Melbourne , 13. Parnell, J. A. (1997). New evidence in the generic strategy and business performance debate: A research note. British Journal of Management. , 8, 175-181. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy . Free Press. Porter, M. E. (1996). What is Strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74 (6), 62. Porter, M. E. (2008). The Five Forces that Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review , 86 (1), 78-93.…

    • 4432 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Strategy formulation has been acknowledged as one of the most crucial factors of ensuring the long-term growth of the business. However, the manner in which strategy is formulated, and most importantly, the nature of the strategy chosen for the company determines its future position in the marketplace (Grant, 2005).…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This is the very essence of strategy making as a learning process. Formal procedures will never be able to forecast discontinuities, inform detached managers, or create novel strategies. Far from providing strategies, planning could not proceed without their prior existence. All this time, therefore, strategic planning has been misnamed. It should have been called strategic programming, distinguished from other useful things that planners can do, and promoted as a process to formalize, when necessary, the consequences of strategies that have already been developed.…

    • 4463 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Strategic Management, and planning, competitive intelligence, and how grand strategy is developed, SWOT analysis and forecasting. How strategy is formulated, carried out and controlled…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thinking Strategically

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Pearce, J. & Robinson, R. (2004). Strategic Management: Formulation, Implementation, and Control, 9e. Formulating Long-Term Objectives and Grand Strategies: The McGraw-Hill Companies.…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Strategy Planning

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Anonymous How to Write a Strategic Plan Retrieved on June 13, 2013 from Yahoo website:…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mc Kinsey Matrix

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The GE / McKinsey matrix is similar to the BCG growth-share matrix in that it maps strategic business units on a grid of the industry and the SBU's position in the industry. The GE matrix however, attempts to improve upon the BCG matrix in the following two ways: The GE matrix generalizes the axes as "Industry Attractiveness" and "Business Unit Strength" whereas the BCG matrix uses the market growth rate as a proxy for industry attractiveness and relative market share as a proxy for the strength of the business unit. The GE matrix has nine cells vs. four cells in the BCG matrix. Industry attractiveness and business unit strength are calculated by first identifying criteria for each, determining the value of each parameter in the criteria, and multiplying that value by a weighting factor. The result is a quantitative measure of industry attractiveness and the business unit's relative performance in that industry.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Is Grand Strategy?

    • 8589 Words
    • 35 Pages

    When my colleagues Paul Kennedy, Charlie Hill, and I first began talking about setting up a grand strategy course at Yale in the late 1990s, at least half the people to whom we tried to explain this thought we were talking about “grant” strategy: how do you get the next federal or foundation grant? This misunderstanding would not have occurred, I think, during the fifty years of insecurity that separated the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in December, 1941, from the final collapse of the Soviet Union in December, 1991. We had a grand strategy for fighting World War II already in place at the time of Pearl Harbor – go after Germany first – and with adjustments we stuck to it throughout that conflict. We had, in containment, a grand strategy for fighting the Cold War worked out within the first five years of that conflict – some would say earlier. With adjustments, we held on to that strategy for the next four decades, despite the confusions generated by our domestic politics, our relations with allies, and at least one grievous miscalculation of fundamental interests, which was the war in Vietnam. We maintained purpose and direction during those dangerous years because we had to. For as Dr. Samuel Johnson once put it: “Depend on it, sir, when a man knows he is to be hanged in a fortnight, it concentrates his mind wonderfully.” Now, maybe historians of some distant future will conclude that the United States has been equally adept at framing and sustaining grand strategies during the two decades that have passed since the Cold War ended. Revisionist ingenuity is always surprising. But I have difficulty right now seeing how that argument is going to be made. Consider the record. The administration of George H. W. Bush, facing the most favorable prospects ever for the use of American power in the international arena, spoke grandly of building a…

    • 8589 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    From the case study Philips are moving toward a new technology toward achieving long-term business objectives, through discovering new services and product to offer to customers and conduct matured tested before reaching to the market place. To a business moving toward a basic direction, for the success of the organization, the business can adopt Grand stratgies.Grand Strategies help the business to move toward strategy direction, it is bases on coordination and continuous effort directed toward attaining long-term business objective. This principle will include concentrated growth, market development, product development, innovation, concentric diversification or conglomerate diversification.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    UNIT III: Strategy Formulation: Porters Value chain - Generic competitive strategies - Portfolio Analysis and its limitation - BCG matrix and GE matrix - Building competitive - advantage for a firm - Strategy versus tactics and making a Strategic Choice - ‘Blue Ocean Strategy’.…

    • 2923 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Strategic Position and Action Evaluation (SPACE) Matrix is four-quadrant framework indicates whether aggressive, conservative, defensive, or competitive strategies are most appropriate for a given organization. The axes of the SPACE Matrix represent two internal dimensions (financial position [FP] and competitive position [CP]) and two external dimensions (stability position [SP] and industry position [IP]). These four factors are perhaps the most important determinants of an organization’s overall strategic position (David, 2011).…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics