Preview

Dictatorship Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
465 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dictatorship Essay
Dictatorship as a form of government is not new. It was a recognised institution in the republican Rome where normally the authority of government was vested in two presidents called Consuls.

In times of emergency the Romans used to appoint a Director to supersede the Consuls, granting him supreme powers to meet the crisis.

But Roman dictatorship was a temporary expedient to meet a crisis and was discarded when the crisis was past. Moreover, the dictator was selected by a legal process with the obligation to submit his use of power to the scrutiny of the permanent authority. The Roman dictatorship was, therefore, “a constitutional device under which the constitution was suspended during a grave crisis of the State.

This description of dictatorship does not apply to the modem dictators of former Soviet Russia, Italy, Germany and some other countries. Modem dictators are not selected by a legal process for a limited period of time in order to steer the State through a national emergency. They come into power as a result of a coup d’etat.

Force is the criterion of their political authority and they remain in power as long as force can retain them. They are responsible to no authority except to themselves. The whole authority of the State is vested in one individual person and he personifies the State.

Some writers are of the opinion that the Russian dictatorship was the dictatorship of a party while in Germany and Italy it was the dictatorship of individuals. But Nazism in Germany and Fascism in Italy were also the rule of a party, though they remained all through overshadowed by a single personality just as Bolshevism was in the days of Lenin and Stalin.

Till yesterday, Khrushchev’s personality loomed large on the political horizon. In fact, no government, as Maclver has shown, is ever actually in the hands of a single individual.

If there is a single seemingly supreme ruler, he inevitably rests his power on the active support of an associated

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Monarchy is defined as ‘a form of government with a monarch at the head’ and was the first arrangement of power in Rome after its founding by Romulus, who reigned from 753-715BC.1 However, by 510BC, the despotic actions of Tarquinius Superbus marked the end of a succession of increasingly tyrannical kings, and the ‘Roman Republic’ was established. This system was based on a sharing of power between, foremost, two consuls who were elected by the people and held office for only one year, then 300 senators, and two popular assemblies, the comitia curiata and the comitia centuriata. With such a spread of auctoritas, the Roman state would be at less risk from corrupt men with their aims set on an autocratic rule. The precepts of the Roman republic were honourable and upheld, in the most part, until the civil wars of 91BC onwards disturbed it, culminating in what many would consider the fall of the Republic, and thus the establishment of a monarchy, with Augustus at the battle of Actium on 2nd September 31BC.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the interwar period (1919-1939), many new authoritarian governments began to spring up and gain lots of popularity. For example, Hitler’s Nazi Germany, Mussolini’s fascist Italy and Stalin’s communist Russia. People became dissatisfied with their democratic governments because their countries had lost recent wars and because their country’s economies were falling apart. They felt as if their government had failed them so they turned to new totalitarian governments. All three of these governments helped their countries “bounce back” economically and militarily so people were more willing to have their individual freedom’s taken away for the good of the state. This motivated authoritarian governments to take control and “redeem” their countries for past embarrassments.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What do the accounts of two Roman emperors reveal about the strategies leaders use to improve their institutions? In the first century BCE, Rome was struggling to govern effectively, take care of its citizens, and deal with bordering nations. Augustus came to power in 27 BCE and his reign oversaw the successful transition from the Roman Republic to the Roman Empire (McKay 156). Just before his death in 14 CE, he wrote his autobiography, Res Gestae Divi Augusti, which details the impressive accomplishments of his long career. This text can be compared to an account of another Roman Emperor, Constantine, who served roughly 300 years later, from 306 to 312 CE. Roman historian Eusebius wrote a detailed biography of Constantine, called The Life of the Blessed Emperor Constantine, and this essay will focus on his description of a significant event in Constantine’s life, his conversion to Christianity. Although Emperors Augustus and Constantine both strived for similar goals of uniting Rome and bringing it to the forefront of the world, these two accounts, Res Gestae Divi Augusti and the Life of the Blessed Emperor Constantine, show that each ruler’s…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    government was once a republic, but turned into a dictatorship under the rule of Julius…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    an almost heriditary monarchy emerged under Augustus.The process can be encapsulated by the history of Romes voting pens. Augustus had erected these to upgrade the old Roman voting enclosure. They were the largest covered building in Rome, by the end of the 1st centuary pens were no longer used for voting. Now they held large shows and giant supermarkets for antiques. Democracy in a traditional sense was almost dead. Vespasian wanted his new amphitheater…

    • 4705 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civics Eoc Study Guide

    • 3272 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Dictatorship – a government controlled by one person or a small group of people who make all decisions.…

    • 3272 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why Rome Fell

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As the saying goes, “Rome was not built in a day.” The decline of Rome can attribute a similar statement, that is, Rome was not destroyed in a day. The fall of Rome can be traced back to the time when Rome was a republic and Julius Caesar marched his legions into the city itself and took control as a dictator. This act alone caused rifts within the Roman ruling class that would echo for generations. The rise of the Emperor replaced the republic and the Emperor himself began to become worshipped as a deity among the traditional pagan beliefs of Roman citizenry. The vast expanse of land that the Roman Empire amassed became difficult to manage by the centralized rule of the Emperor. This led to the governing of the outlying provinces to individual governors, who at times were more interested in their own prosperity than of the prosperity of the Empire. The governors’ own political initiatives led to the Emperor losing his power in the outlying provinces. An example of this is the Roman governors Vindex and Galba, who during the reign of Emperor Nero revolted against the central government. Vindex supported Galba in his bid to overthrow Nero in order to pursue Vindex’s own political prowess under Galba’s new regime. (Donahue, 1999) Revolts such as this one illustrate how people who are distanced from the central government find it difficult to be ruled by them. It is interesting to see that both Vindex and Galba were from the far reaches of the Roman…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    revision notes

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages

    -as romans took over more places and people they adjusted their institutions to the task of ruling an imperial capital city and distant places. Rather than having kings they installed 2 consuls or chief magistrates who would hold office for 1 year. This radical move from kingship to republic was accompanied by measures designed to prevent a return to one-man rule. Personal authority in the republic was constrained by a strict term limit on magistracies.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government at first was a republican represented by two mane rulers and a senate. It later changed into a dictator form of government with one superior leader and a less important senate.…

    • 783 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    absolutism dbq

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout history autocratic rulers have come to power. Autocratic rulers control the power of the nobility, control religious authorities as well as, use armies to expand their borders and make laws. These leaders have tried to control their countries. The actions taken to control their countries helped and hurt the countries. Two such leaders, Czar Peter the Great of Russia and King Louis the XIV of France were both examples of Autocrat whose actions helped and hurt their countries. Peter the Great’s autocratic actions like taking control by expanding and westernizing his country and building a new capital, both helped and hurt his country. Louis XIV was another example of an autocratic ruler who actions like building a magnificent palace in order to control the nobility and thinking that France revolved around him, both helped and hurt his country.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History 101

    • 3331 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The Roman _________________________ was a temporary executive during the period of the Republic and exercised unlimited power for a period of usually six months.…

    • 3331 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Legacy

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The citizens’ power to elect representatives for the Senate, originated during these leaders’ reigns. A strong President, much like a Greek king or Roman Caesar, must provide the stability and leadership required during times of crisis. While Alexander espoused democracy for the people he conquered, Julius infused western civilization into the territories he acquired. Thus combined, they provided a new form of supremacy to the people that served as a basis for many leaders. In this case, the more powerful and effective leadership is portrayed by Julius Caesar not only because of his redesign of politics, but also his advances in military and cultural achievements.…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cultural diffusion has occurred in the U.S.A., to the point where most customs come from other cultures.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman Empire’s vast territory made the empire difficult to rule and maintain, which was exacerbated by the incompetence and inconsistency of the emperor’s authority. The Roman’s system of electing an emperor was never near effective; the decision was open to discussion between the senate, the old emperor, the Praetorian Guard, and the Roman Army. The power of selecting the emperor eventually fell to the Praetorian Guard (the emperor’s private squad), which would be given more authority by the emperor, maintaining an endless cycle. At one point the Praetorian Guard would auction the title of emperor to the highest bidder. At a period of 100 years the empire would elect 37 emperors, 25 of whom were murdered. The internal turmoil of the Roman government resulted in the depreciation of national pride and faith in the government, which ultimately sponsored the empire’s decline and final…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays