While some may say that to argue this paper you need to have one side on the argument. If you look at the nature and nurture side you will see that it's impossible to not have both sides of the argument. For example if someone is born with a disability no matter what that child is influenced
by nature. While if someone is born without a disability he may be influenced through nurture, in his environment that he is grown up in.
If we look at the Nature side in why it can be said to be wrong or why people may not agree or take this side of the argument, is that someone can’t love snowboarding or claim to love it, until that someone tries it. Without the experience it's impossible to say you enjoyed snowboarding, Right? Or do you think that it’s already in your genes that you will love snowboarding. This is very unlikely, experiences and influences are what make us who we are. And if you say it’s in your genes than what if you fall and break your arm and then now you decide you hate snowboarding. Well then it couldn’t be embedded in your genes that you like snowboarding. This shows how the nature side can be proved wrong and why nurture has to do with a lot in your life. However nature does have a lot of influence in your life.