Preview

differences and similarities of taylor and foyol

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
606 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
differences and similarities of taylor and foyol
Management Concept
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
Similarities-Difference F.Taylor-Henry Fayol
Similarities in the works F Taylor – Henry Fayol
1.Both are Pioneers:Taylor & Fayol are the two Pioneers in the evolution of management thought.2.Both pointed out problems of personnel: Taylor & Fayol both pointed out that the problem of personnel and its management at all levels is the ‘master-key’ to industrial productivity and progress.3.Both implied scientific approach: Both implied scientific approach and scientific method to solve the managerial problems.4. Success depends upon proper utilization of human resources: both had realized that success of a business enterprise depends largely on proper utilization of human resources.5.Stress on the technical and professional aspect: Both stressed on the technical or professional aspect of the management.6.Both are responsible for managerial revolution: Both are responsible for managerial revolution which took place after 1940. 7. Successful managers by profession: Both of them were initially successful managers by profession. They, therefore, approached this new science of management from a practical point of view. 8. Criticism for neglecting human psychology: Both approaches are criticized on the ground of neglecting human psychology. Behavior of the employees under different conditions is not studied in either of these theories. 9. Both wanted to secure maximum: both wanted to secure maximum from available resources.10. Both developed principle of division of work: Both of them developed the principle of division of work. Taylor introduced the principle of unity of command which was later developed by Fayol.11. Both opined that competent mgmt is necessary for success of business: both agreed that neither success nor failure is the result of the workers, contribution, competent mgmt is responsible for the success of the business and the failure of the business is the result of incompetent mgmt.12. Both used

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fayol vs. Mintzberg

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I intend to investigate both of these men, who are prolific names within management and organisational theory, and have some contrasting views, but also some similarities and development on Fayol’s theories. I will look at the pros and cons of each argument, and the similarities, then explain my view on the more effective management style.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The theories of Frederick W. Taylor’s Scientific Management proposed in Edwin A. Locke’s (1982) “The Ideas of Frederick W. Taylor An evaluation” point to Taylor’s tremendous influence on modern-day management. Because Taylor developed this principle in the early 1900’s focusing mainly on scientific decision-making and individualized work while working with manufacturing industry, it poses questions on it’s validity in the modern-day management and how effective his techniques in employer-employee relationship. this posed a lot of Locke indicates that Taylor’s Scientific Management theory led to the beginning of modern management principles and methods that are still being used by many managers around the world (Robbins, Bergman, Stagg & Coulter, 2012).…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The chosen article that will be explored through this essay, by Locke, Edwin A. (1982) The Ideas of Frederick W. Taylor: An Evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 7(1). This main source believes that Taylor was the Founding father of Scientific Management, being his key principle, featuring the one best way. However in order to understand the reasoning and logic behind Taylors principles, one must understand the context of the time to make informed decision of the validity of the principles. Fifty percent of the sources believe that Taylor’s principles have transcended through time, forming the basis for modern day contemporary organizations, such as IBM. However the other half of the sources believe that Taylor’s principles have been a detriment to society, which have dehumanized the workforce, creating men as machines, believing that this has established the elements of today’s bureaucratic society.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    What was Taylor’s idea about the management? Management involves coordinating and overseeing the work activities of others so that their activities are completed efficiently and effectively. The ideas about the relationship between employer and employee have been developed from a nother.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Taylorism

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Frederick Winslow Taylor published a book in 1911 recommending his theory of scientific management which altered the management model later. There are many management theories willing to improve workers’ efficiency but not influential while Taylor used scientific methods to sum up standardized rules and the theory was spread till today and still available. In the following text, three key elements of the Taylorism and their applicability in contemporary organizations will be presented and analysed.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Frederick Taylor was the founder of scientific management. It emphasizes scientifically determined changes as the solutions to improve labour productivity (Daft, 1997). Taylor suggested that raising the wage can increase the working incentive of workers and he provided chances for workers to develop and perform in a higher grade. Nonetheless, the ultimate goal is still maximizing the profit (Pugh and Hickson, 1989). Concerning the theory of Follett (Graham, 1995), although she found drawbacks of scientific management and suggested the human relations model, the aim of the two theories is the same, maximizing the productivity though they use different ways to achieve the goal. Besides, the idea of division of labour is also welcomed by both theorists. Taylor believed that all people can perform very well in a particular aspect (Pugh and Hickson, 1989). Functional Management is like division of labour. Follett did not support very strict division of labour. Nevertheless, basically, she believed that division of labour with respect to the strengths of each worker can increase output (Graham, 1995). She put emphasis on humanistic perspective to divide labours. Obviously, they both have the same destination,…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Contemporary Management

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The essay will endeavor to provide an insight into how Fayol’s basic principles of Classical Management Functions are indeed useful in describing managerial work. In the last (20th) century, the role of managers in business becomes more diverse as the number of tasks in which businesses were involved in significantly grew in quantity and complexity. As a result there was an increased interest in the most effective and efficient method of management. This led to the development of different management theories, which included classical management functions which one (1) could argue led to management being defined as the process of organizing tasks through employees to make sure that goals and objectives are met efficiently. (Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter 2006, p. 9).…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Management Reflection

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Fayol is also famous for the classical ‘school of management’ in which command and control is emphasized and published in “General and Industrial management” which is still highly referred to a century later. Fayol taught that management was comprised of five major components: Planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating and controlling.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human behavior is exceedingly complicated and it is impossible to categorize the motives behind all of our actions under the singular primary reasoning. Despite this, various philosophers such as Hobbes and Nietzsche have supported that egoism as the most prominent explanation for all motivation and actions. Fitting all of human motivation into one concept would be an injustice to the beautiful complexity of the human mind; assuming that there is one underlying reasoning to all of humankind’s actions ignores how complex social interactions, human thought, and decision-making can be. Instead, we must adopt an alternative theory on human interactions with others with incorporates both an egoistic and altruistic viewpoint. A well-supported alternative…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    As for the given article, Locke (1982) describes the Taylor’s philosophy of management, Taylor’s techniques (time and motion study, standardization, the task, economic men, individualized work, training systems and skills management, careful selection, shorter working hours and rest pauses), the criticisms of Taylor (human motivation towards work, social factors, authoritarianism, exploiting workers, antiunion and dishonest) and the validity of scientific management. Locke, to a large degree, agrees with Taylor that he listed a large amount of evidence to support to viewpoint of Taylor. And he assert that as the along with the development of the age, there exist several problems in the theory of Taylor such as management –labor cooperation. After all, Locke justifies the validity of each criticisms of Taylor. Locke (1982) considered that most of Taylor’s ideas are still valid today.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mcgregor's X and Y Theory

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Before the industrial revolution, the majority of manufacturing was done by a system called ‘crafts production’, where a number of skilled workers hand manufactured products (Waddell 2010, p.39). However during the industrial revolution the concept of job specialisation appeared and the new ‘factory system’ proved to be much more efficient and able to produce a higher quantity of goods (Waddell 2010, p.39). One of the first people to begin work on the modern theory of management was Frederick W. Taylor who defined the principles of the scientific management theory which ran from the 1890’s to the 1940’s. Taylor has often been criticised for being unfriendly towards the human side of an organisation, that is, the workers (Carson, 2005). However Carson (2005) argues that Taylor’s goal was to get the most out of the employees but in a way that was “fair and with the workers’ interests in Mind”. The Administrative management theory which incorporated Weber’s idea of bureaucracy and Fayol’s idea of management was being developed side-by-side the scientific management theory. The main similarities between Weber’s and Fayol’s ideas were the need for a hierarchy of authority and the division of labour (Waddell 2010, p.45-6). Behavioural management theory was developed around the early 1900’s and stretched well into the 90’s. One of the…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henri Fayol's theory proposes that management consists of planning, commanding, coordinating, controlling and organizing. He states that power relationships are formed within this structure and led by a reward system offered by management. Attitudes within the organization are guided by how the management uses their authority to dictate the rewards. This is a basic approach use by management, however as the world change and expands on a bigger ground, Henri Fayol’s proposal has become a much of a challenge for the concept is basically base on the top management and that a certain organization’s success depends solely on the performance of the manager. Henri Fayol’s approach is base on a one direction organization which doesn’t take new roads; in my own opinion this approach will gradually be stagnant.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main difference between Taylors and Fayol’s approaches was that Taylor wanted to achieve increased organization efficiency by modifying the way in which workers carry out their tasks and Fayol on the contrary by modifying the way the organization is…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Frederick Taylor’s theory focuses on individual worker-machine relationships in manufacturing plants, while Henri Fayol focuses on the top managers and their actions. This is the basic difference that Taylor reviewed the organization from the bottom and Fayol view it from the top (George, 1968).…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Taylorism

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This essay is going to discuss about Taylor’s scientific approach to management and technique which are widely accepted by contemporary managers. Furthermore, it will look at how Taylor’s technique is applied to management nowadays.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics