Preview

Direct Democracy And Representative Democracy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
332 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Direct Democracy And Representative Democracy
In the beginning of the chapter, we are told what is power, in the political sense, and who has the authority to use it. There are two different understandings of democracy: direct democracy (the rule of many) and representative democracy. The US government uses representative democracy, everyone is given their own power, even if it's as minimal as voting for a leader to represent you. The Framers of the Constitution believed a direct democracy would lead to people following the popular opinion instead of the common good for the nation.
Despite being run on a democracy, people have separate views of how the government is operated. There is the marxist view where government is described as being run by the employer versus the workers. The

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The founding fathers were afraid of any entity in the new government becoming too much like the monarchs they had fled from. For that reason there are limitations built into the United States Constitution that give each branch of government some control over the other branches. The United States system of government is based on a set of checks and balances that keep one branch or one person from becoming too powerful. It divides the powers of the federal government between the Congress, the President and the Federal Courts. One of the powers of the President is to exercise the veto over bills passed by Congress. This…

    • 2303 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As of now, we only have two different democratic representation models: trustee and delegate. The trustee model says that representatives should be allowed to use their own judgment when deciding upon how they will vote on particular legislation. A trustee tries to lead his/her constituents, rather than follow them. Trustees are willing to run the risk of losing re-election if that means voting for the right thing, and I respect that.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The United States’ form of government is a controversial topic in this modern era and has been for decades. The big question “Is the United States a democracy, a republic or something else?” According to the article On Democracy in Our Republic by an unknown author, there is a logically reinforced thesis that the United States is a republic and not a democracy.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Federalist Paper #47, James Madison explicates how one person or group withholding all the power is the definition of tyranny and that, “[L]iberty requires the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct.” The excerpt from the United States’ Constitution explain the different powers given to each branch of government. For instance, in Article 1, Section 1 it states, “All legislative power herein granted shall be vested in a Congress…” Moreover, the United States’ Constitution explains, “The executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States.” Additionally, the Constitution states, “The judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court and in such inferior courts….” Separation of Powers helps guard against tyranny because we prevent a singular branch from ruling over the people and have all the power, the very definition of tyranny. By separating the power of each branch it assures that no one branch overpowers…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Correct. The English nobility gained the most benefits from the Magna Carta, which established limitations on the power of the king.…

    • 2223 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    (c) Is pressure group politics in the UK better described as pluralist or as elitist?…

    • 4329 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within those powers were the legislative, judicial, and the executive branch. Under the executive branch, a man named James Madison believed himself to be of the Federalist Party. The Federalist people believed that the Constitution would give the national government enough power to solve the country's problems and believed that the system of checks and balanced would limit the President's power. According to Document 4, the system of checks and balances feared James Madison because he was afraid that one group would have too much power. However, by definition the system of checks and balances gives one branch the authority to stop or check the other braches. This will prevent just one branch from receiving all of the…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S Constitution was written in 1787. The Founding Fathers “recognized that government depended on the consent of the governed” (Dye & Gaddie, 80). The citizens of the United States give the government permission to have a government. The Founding Fathers are very significant because they provided limits on the power of the majority and safeguarded the rights of the minority. The Bill of Rights also provides safety for the minority and does not allow the majority to exceed their power. The paradox of democracy, the Founding Fathers, and checks and balances along with the U.S. Constitution provide limits on the power of the majority and safeguard the rights of the minority.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The state of Georgia utilizes recall and legislature. In direct democracy, people become more involved with politics, and have greater power speaking their own opinions which can improve democracy. Direct democracy can be good by serving the people that take part in it, but it has it’s downfalls as well. Although, people in the community come together, direct democracy in my opinion grants people in the community too much power. This can lead to a disadvantage in direct democracy by causing potential harm to minority groups. This system set to where citizens have direct power in decision making. It’s evident that minority groups have less power it’s like the wealthy versus the poor. Case in point, according to the text the battle over illegal…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Upon the founding of America, a great deal of pressure was placed onto the Founding Fathers to create a system in which the central government will not acquire too much power and the citizens will be well represented. A representative democracy was, overall, a more effective answer to the question of how to govern the new country rather than a direct democracy after seeing the effects that the Articles of Confederation created when too much of the power of the government was given to the people and their states. A stronger central government was needed without taking away the voice of the people, and that’s what was decided on. However, even though this way has proven to be the most effective way to govern a country, it has its flaws within the system. Corruption finds its way through the system in ways of interest groups and political parties. This system is not immune to factions nor the effect of those factions, and those effects often make their way to important matters within the government.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States was founded on a core belief that one person should not be granted all the power. More specifically, like Great Britain in the late 1700’s. Through the tyranny the founding fathers experienced under the UK rule, they developed a system that divides the power across multiple levels of government. The U.S. Constitution determines all the power granted and not to each branch. There are seven main components that outline the spread of responsibilities.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Founding Fathers began designing America’s government in 1787, one of their greatest fears was the possibility of the dumb majority using their power to pass uneducated and disastrous legislature. They feared “the mob”, the everyday citizens that had little schooling and knew almost nothing about politics. To avoid giving the voters too much power, a Representative-Democracy style government was created, a system where citizens would vote for a person or group to represent them in making legislature. Referendum votes bypass the politicians and ask for the people’s opinion directly- they are direct votes where the entire country is invited to vote on an issue, which give the people a chance for their voices to be heard. While a good…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution is the place where it states, clearly and explicitly, which powers we choose to give, and which powers we refuse to give. The Article IV created a strong national government that was powerful enough to take care of business, but also let states run themselves without interference from the government. In old fashioned monarchies, they held all powers of government, the power to make the law, the power to enforce the law, and the power to judge the law with no checks or balances. So when they designed the Constitution of the United States, the Framers insisted for the separation of powers to keep the government in check .The Framers believed the most important action in preventing tyranny in America was to divide the key powers of government amongst the three branches. They could have stopped there, leaving it up to the officials of the three branches to figure out how to defend their own powers and limit the powers of the others. But that might have led to a conflict between the branches. So the Framers carefully constructed a system of articles of seven divisions, that provided specific power to allow each of the branches of government equal…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    My first reason why i think the people have the most power in the Constitution is that they get to vote for their president. The people votes for the president so they can have the right to do the right things. Also, if we didn’t have a president, then this place would be anarchy and get out of control. Everyone in the U.S would kill and fight each other because there is no one to control them. Without a president, this place would be a disaster and unhealthy. So we need the people to vote.…

    • 95 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States is said to be and has the properties of a democracy. A democracy is defined as a government in which the people decide matters directly through town hall meetings or voting on a ballot box. There have been a few major laws passed that have been passed by Supreme Court in which the people didn’t have a vote or consent on the law. Two examples of this are legalizing gay marriage and gun laws. The United States has also in a way turned into an oligarchy. It has come to where the rich are starting to rule the country. If the U.S was truly a democracy the government would look to all of the people for their vote and consent on a law, and their should be equality between the first, middle, and lower class people.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays