Preview

Disengaging From Engagement

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
8587 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Disengaging From Engagement
bs_bs_banner

doi: 10.1111/1748-8583.12046

PROVOCATION SERIES PAPER
Disengaging from engagement
John Purcell, University of Bath
Human Resource Management Journal, Vol 24, no 3, 2014, pages 241–254

Two basic approaches to engagement are contrasted. Work engagement relates to an individual’s psychological state of mind while at work. The problems with this and its limited relevance to HRM are considered: its concern with a minority of employees, the way non-engaged staff are portrayed, the airbrushing out of conflict and the pernicious use of positive psychology. Employee or behavioural engagement is more relevant to HRM and employment relations but suffers from a lack of definition and a failure to specify the components that are associated with higher levels of employee engagement. It is usually a-contextual and lacks the subtlety of earlier work on HR and performance, while covering the same ground. Problems remain with research seeking to show the connections with financial performance.
Boiling engagement measures down to one score is particularly worrying. The management of employee engagement in the UK National Health Service illustrates that properly constructed studies of employee engagement can inform policies and practices to improve work relations, employee well-being and aspects of performance.
Contact: John Purcell, School of Management, University of Bath, Bath BA4 7AL, UK. Email: purjohn@gmail.com Keywords: work engagement; positive psychology; employee engagement; social exchange; performance; surveys
INTRODUCTION

T

he engagement ‘industry’ (Welbourne, 2011), better described by Macey and Schneider
(2008) as a ‘folk theory’, rolls on and gathers pace after the promising start made by
Kahn (1990). By now, most of the large consulting companies have sought to corner the profitable market of devising and selling their own engagement surveys with dubious constructs and measures (Briner, 2014), purporting to show links to performance with implied



References: Alfes, K., Shantz, A., Truss, C. and Soane, E. (2013). ‘The link between perceived human resource management practices, engagement and employee behaviour: a moderated mediation model’. Appelbuam, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P. and Kallenberg, A. (2000). Manufacturing Advantage: Why High Performance Systems Pay Off, Ithaca, NY: ILR Press. Arkin, A. (2011). ‘Is engagement working?’ People Management, 1 November. Bakker, A. (2009). ‘Building engagement in the workplace’, in R. Burke and C. Cooper (eds), The Peak Performing Organization, Abingdon: Routledge. HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, VOL 24 NO 3, 2014 © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Balain, S. and Sparrow, P. (2011). ‘Engaged with what? A systematic review of the construct of engagement’. Batt, R. (2002). ‘Managing customer services: human resource practices, quit rates and sales growth’. Batt, R. and Moynihan, L. (2004). ‘The viability of alternative call centre production models’, in S. Boselie, P., Dietz, G. and Boon, C. (2005). ‘Commonalities and contradictions in research on human resource management and performance’ Briner, R. (2014). ‘What is employee engagement and does it matter? An evidence-based approach’, in D CIPD (2011). Conflict Management Survey Report, London: CIPD. Dromey, J. (2014). Meeting the Challenge: Successful Employee Engagement in the NHS, London: IPA. Engage for Success (2014) Special Interest Group Output: The Future of Employee Engagement. Fletcher, L. and Robinson, D. (2014). ‘Measuring and understanding engagement’, in C. Truss, R. Francis, H. and Reddington, M. (2012). ‘Employer branding and organisational effectiveness’, in H. Francis, R. (2013). Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Enquiry, London: Department of Health. Gallie, D., Felstead, A., Green, F. and Inanc, H. (2013). Fear at Work in Britain: First Findings from the Skills and Employment Survey 2013 Gallup Business Journal (2012). ‘Engaged employees inspire company innovation’. Gallup Study, 12 October 2006. Gardiner, B. (2013). ‘Employee engagement’. Business World, Australia, 23 September. George, J. (2011). ‘The wider context, costs and benefits of work engagement’. European Journal of Work and Organisational Psychology, 20: 1, 53–59. Goddard, J. (2014). ‘The psychologisation of employment relations?’ Human Resource Management Journal, 24: 1, 1–18. Guest, D. (2014). ‘Employee engagement: fashionable fad or long-term fixture?’, in C. Truss, R. Harter, J.K., Schmidt, F.L. and Hayes, T.L. (2002). ‘Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis’ Hutchinson, S. and Purcell, J. (2010). ‘Managing ward managers for roles in HRM in the NHS: overworked and under-resourced’ Jenkins, S. and Delbridge, R. (2013). ‘Context matters: examining “soft” and “hard” approaches to employee engagement in two workplaces’ 24: 14, 2670–2691. Kahn, W. (1990). ‘Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work’. Kelliher, C., Hope-Hailey, V. and Farndale, E. (2014). ‘Employee engagement in multinational organisations’, in C 252 HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, VOL 24 NO 3, 2014 Legge, K. (1995). ‘HRM: rhetoric, reality and hidden agendas’, in J. Storey (ed.), Human Resource Management: A Critical Text, London: Routledge. Lewis, R., Donaldson-Feilder, E. and Tharani, T. (2012). Managing for Sustainable Employee Engagement: Developing a Sustainable Framework, London: CIPD. Macey, W. and Schneider, B. (2008). ‘The meaning of employee engagement’. Industrial and Organisational Psychology, 1: 1, 3–30. MacLeod, D. and Clarke, N. (2009). Engaging for Success: Enhancing Performance through Employee Engagement Milgrom, P. and Roberts, J. (1992). Economics, Organization and Management, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. NHS Employers (2014). The Staff Engagement Toolkit: An Online Resource Supporting You to Increase Staff Engagement in Your Organisation Porter, M. (1980). Competitive Strategy, New York: Free Press. Purcell, J. (1995). ‘Corporate strategy and its link with human resource management strategy’, in J. Purcell, J. (2014a). ‘Can employee voice and participation unlock employee engagement?’ Insights: Melbourne Business and Economics, 15: 23–30. Purcell, J. (2014b). ‘Time to focus on employee voice as a prime antecedent of engagement: rediscovering the black box’, in D

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In 2002 Conant hired the help of Gallup, a polling and research firm, to better understand his company’s engagement levels. Gallup found that 62% of Campbell’s managers were not actively engaged in their jobs and 12% were actively disengaged. Those numbers were some of the worst for any Fortune 500 firm ever polled. By Gallup standards the ideal level of employee engagement is to have a ratio of 12 actively engaged employees for every disengaged employee. Campbell’s ratio was only 2:1; that is, only 2 actively engaged employees for every disengaged employee.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    AON Hewit (2012) 2012 Trends in Global Employee Engagement Retrieved from http://www.aon.com/attachments/human-capital- consulting/2012_TrendsInGlobalEngagement_Final_v11.pdf p. 22…

    • 1718 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Engagement Strategy Presentation and Outline HRM/ 552 10/13/2014 Rosalicia Cordova PRESENTED BY: Kelli Coleman, Edwin Hassel, Margaret Robinson, Mindi Dorsey and Diane Mitchell-Porter INTRODUCTION EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT MAXIMIZES THE CAPABILITIES AND GIFTS OF EACH INDIVIDUAL WITHIN AN ORGANIZATION. ENGAGEMENT ENHANCES JOB PERFORMANCE IN VARIOUS WAYS AND IS RELATED TO SIGNIFICANT BUSINESS OUTCOMES, INCLUDING CUSTOMER SATISFACTION AND EMPLOYEE EFFICIENCY (BERSIN, 2014). AN "ENGAGED EMPLOYEE" IS AN INDIVIDUAL WHO IS COMPLETELY ABSORBED BY AND PASSIONATE ABOUT THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES WHILE TAKING POSITIVE ACTION TO EXTEND THEIR ORGANIZATIONS REPUTATION.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Evaluating Hr Function

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Our Organisation, the Management Functions within it, how the HR Function is organised and how performance is measured……

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Companies with low levels of employee engagement have 33% annual decline in annual income and 11% earning income. Those with high levels have 19% increase in operating income and 28% growth in earning share.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fred Maiorino Case

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages

    MacLeod, D., Clarke, N. (2009). Engaging for success: enhancing performance through employee engagement, Department of Business, Innovation and Skills, London, available at: www.bis.gov.uk/files/file52215.pdf (accessed 6 September 2013).…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a complex and detailed body of academic literature that explores the development of the concept of employee engagement over the past 10 – 15 years. This literature suggests it is more than staff satisfaction, builds on organisational citizenship behaviour and commitment to include intellectual, emotional and behaviour elements and describes the employee’s sense of identification, advocacy and pride and desire for the organisation to succeed10. Employee engagement is about the employee’s experience of work. It is about the combination of factors that make the individual feel involved and willing to behave in ways that go beyond the day to day minimum and to work towards the longer term objectives of the organisation. The following definition reflects the elements that staff and managers described as important to make it relevant and meaningful: reference to patients, process and outcomes, value and the two-way nature of the dialogue and…

    • 4579 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Employee Engagement – Ensuring that the way employees emotionally relate to their work, colleagues and organisation is positive and understood.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Torrington, D., Hall, L., Taylor, S. and Atkinson, C. (2011) ‘Human resource Management’ (8th ed.) London: Pearson…

    • 3121 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    David MacLeod, Nita Clarke Engaging for success: enhancing performance through employee engagement. A report to Government Page 7, paragraph 2: http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/1810/1/file52215.pdf…

    • 1840 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to the CIPD

    • 2696 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Employee engagement is considered one of the more contemporary human resources management practices. There are numerous benefits to these practices. It 's value is in fact a much debated topic not only within academia but also within the business world. Numerous major blue-chip corporations have adopted practices concerning employee engagement; amongst them (Gray, 2013)Sainsbury and BAE Systems. The impact of which have also extended into the public sector namely the NHS. Bearing in mind that recently there have been major cutbacks from the government concerning the organization.…

    • 2696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Employee Engagement

    • 1938 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Employee engagement is the emotional commitment an employee shows for the organization and its goals (Kruse 2012). It can also be defined as the act of an employee being involved in, enthusiastic about and satisfied with his or her work (Seijts et al.., 2006). An engaged employee is one who actually cares and is passionate about his job and company goals. He or she does not work just to get a paycheck rather they work to ensure the organization’s goals are met.…

    • 1938 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Employee Engagement

    • 2752 Words
    • 12 Pages

    A wide variety of research evidence supports the notion that staff who are engaged deliver higher productivity and organisational performance, increased operating and net profit, improved customer focus, lower levels of absenteeism and higher retention. An important driver of employee engagement is clarity of leadership vision and direction. While Gaynor has that vision, there is a challenge to engage all the members of the management team in this vision so that they in turn can lead the engagement of their staff. The strategy examines four themes as being the key enablers and barriers to employee engagement. Each of these themes is considered and recommendations are made which support the development of employee engagement.…

    • 2752 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Employee Engagement

    • 3382 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Outline the findings of key recent studies on employee engagement in practice including the extent to which gender, demographic and other factors influence levels of engagement. Why is employment engagement a ‘hot topic’ for many organisations?…

    • 3382 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Job Engagement

    • 3945 Words
    • 16 Pages

    eople who are engaged in their jobs— those who are enthusiastic and involved in their day-to-day work—tend to do better work. This statement makes intuitive sense to most people and is our basic premise in this article. We cover three main questions related to this premise. First, what specifically does job engagement mean? Second, what is the economic case for the importance of job engagement—in other words, what is the hard evidence that job engagement really matters? Third, what can be done to improve job engagement? Throughout this article, we focus on employee surveys as an important means of measuring and improving job engagement.…

    • 3945 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays