Preview

District Of Columbia Self Defense Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
611 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
District Of Columbia Self Defense Case Study
District of Columbia took on Heller in the supreme court in 2008(Doherty 8). The case was a close supreme court case, it had a five to four justice decision (Doherty 4). Heller thought that the second amendment should allow anyone to keep a weapon for self defence in a home registered or unregistered, but District of Columbia did not think that. District of Columbia was upset with the results of the case yet Heller was quite pleased with the results of the supreme court decision. The results of the case have not changed since the results in 2008, some believed that if Donald Trump did not get elected the results would be changed by Hillary Clinton and District of Columbia taking on Heller again. The case started when Heller was told by …show more content…

District of Columbia did not allow him to have a weapon for self defence without a lock or safe. The case made the supreme court thoroughly review the second amendment to see if it allowed us to keep a weapon our home unregistered for self defence. Although the second amendment does not allow anyone to carry an unregistered weapon. At the same time, Heller did have to compromise some such as Prohibit firearm possession by felons and the mentally ill, Forbid firearm possession in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, and Impose conditions on the commercial sale of firearms. Heller won the case with a five to four justice decision in the supreme court (Doherty 4). When the justices were thoroughly reviewing the case, they found that the second amendment did protect the ability to keep a weapon in a house for self defense,unregistered, or without a lock or safe . The justices that agreed with heller were Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito. The ones that disagreed with Heller and agreed with District of Columbia were Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg and Breyer. Some think that District of Columbia should have won not

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bsbwor501 Final Exam

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The US Supreme Court has held that the Second Amendment does NOT apply only to the militia.…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court sided with the district court and Hobby Lobby with a 5 to 4 vote. The main argument was if a “closely held” business (a private business…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The court that the case started in was the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The court system agreed with Heller and said DC was denying him the rights to own a handgun or any other type of firearm in the house for his personal protection for him and his family. The fact that the District of Columbia wanted the firearm to be non functional also…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Decision: The Court of Appeals took action and reversed the conviction on the basis that the commerce power of the Congress did not reach out as far as to make that conviction. The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Court of Appeals which stated that Congress’s Commerce power was limited and could not regulate the carrying of firearms or to categorize it as commerce, and that there was no evidence that…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Section 4 Pros And Cons

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Whoever proves the Supreme Court’s decision based on constitutionality wins. The round shall not stray to the effectiveness or benefits of Section 4 and instead should focus on constitutionality.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    5) Reasoning/Analysis: This case mentioned “D.C v. Heller” many times and used this case as precedent. If it was decided that the 2nd amendment protected handguns in the home on federal jurisdiction, then states must apply as well. Also it was believed that bearing arms, although not used in the same sense as it was when first written, was still deeply rooted in American…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He argues that the regulating firearms is against the second amendment. The Supreme Court decided that because of Article 1, Section 8 (the militia clause), that “[i]n the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a [sawed-off] shotgun . . . has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Library of Congress. (2011, April). United States: Gun Ownership and the Supreme Court. Retrieved from…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On June 28, 2010, the Supreme Court issued its second major ruling on gun rights in three years, ensuring our federally protected right to keep and bear arms in all 50 states. The ruling states that the right to "keep and bear arms" is incorporated by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and applies to the states. No longer will State or local governments be allowed to ban most Americans from owning most types of handguns. The ruling effectively strikes down Chicago's handgun ban, not unlike the Washington D.C. law that was already ruled to be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court two years ago in D.C. v. Heller. Gun Rights Advocates hailed the decision across the Country as a major victory before the "conservative" majority…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Overall this amendment is about self defense. Although, the second amendment has many different meanings. It also applies to hunting, target practice, and other forms gun sports. Although, there are some restrictions to these recreations. “You must also follow your state's gun control laws.” as stated…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment states, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” This amendment has caused many debates throughout the years due to the different ways in which it could be interpreted. Most federal appeals courts have said that, when read as a whole, this amendment protects only the rights of the militia to bear arms. However, on a decision made on March 8, 2007, the majority focused on the second clause, saying that the amendment protects the rights of individual people to own firearms as well. The decision was made in a federal appeals court in Washington to strike down a gun control law in the District of Columbia that made it impossible for residents to keep handguns in their homes. The court ruled that banning the right to own firearms was a violation of the Second Amendment.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment has been one of the most controversial topics that America faces today. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" (LII). Under the constitution, you are able to own guns but there has been many restrictions and Acts that control your rights to a minimum. Gun rights reforms are how the Acts and certain limitations are made. These reforms are made to help lower the dangers of these weapons and allow for higher protection. The Second Amendment and Gun Rights should be adapted to today’s society along with certain past events to allow citizens to bear arms publicly. In multiple scenarios, these past event may have been avoided if gun control was open to more eligible citizens.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The extent to which the Second Amendment applies and the particular laws that go hand in hand with it have long been contested by Americans. One of the more recent debates regarding it involves the Stand Your Ground laws. These laws outline that citizens have “No duty to retreat from the situation before resorting to deadly force; not limited to your property (home, office, etc.)” (“States That Have” Par. 3). These laws have been fiercely contested primarily due to the incident involving George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin in the February of 2012. People are often very stubborn regarding such issues, however, in her article “There is No Need to Change Stand Your Ground Laws” (published November 13, 2012 in the Palm Beach Post), Dara Kam uses her experience covering political issues along with a very straight forward…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The court decided that militia does not limit the Second Amendment and that militia should not be limited to those who serve in the military. It protected an individual's right in more traditional lawful parts like using a firearm for self defense. This court case also helped declare Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975 as unconstitutional. (oyez.org) Later McDonald v Chicago also set a precedent in 2010 that extended to the states having more protection with gun rights. Both of these cases ruled in favor of protecting our gun rights. (Supreme Court)…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Self Defense

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are justice system to make correction when individual that breaks the law. The concept of two affirmative in the law has been placed for a purpose. Those are tools that are able to help with interrogation and also in the legal system of courts. People break the laws for many reasons some do it because of their beliefs, out of revenge and others just behave that way. Some people feel like it’s a necessity to do something out of the law because they don’t want to feel control by the government. There are many ways to prove if someone innocent or guilty in the court system based on the crime they committed. There are two affirmative defenses which typically possesses the burden of production as well as the burden of persuasion, justification…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays