Preview

Why Is Gun Control Unconstitutional

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
695 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Gun Control Unconstitutional
The issue is whether or not it is unconstitutional to have gun control in the United States. I think we shouldn't have gun control but support gun rights. Gun control would be against the common good. If the government took away the guns from citizens we would have no way of protecting ourselves. People wishing to use guns to harm people could smuggle them in from other countries and lie about having them. Therefore if a citizen had a gun, that citizen could hypothetically stop the other person from harming others.

This issue is important because we need to be able to defend ourselves and the people we care about. We don't just need to be able to defend against people attempting to hurt our country but also our government. Citizens could easily be
…show more content…
The court decided that militia does not limit the Second Amendment and that militia should not be limited to those who serve in the military. It protected an individual's right in more traditional lawful parts like using a firearm for self defense. This court case also helped declare Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975 as unconstitutional. (oyez.org) Later McDonald v Chicago also set a precedent in 2010 that extended to the states having more protection with gun rights. Both of these cases ruled in favor of protecting our gun rights. (Supreme Court)

Gun rights are important if we want to be able to defend ourselves. For instance a Glendale resident spotted a burglary suspect and confronted them with a firearm. He then continued on and restrained the individual with zip ties until the police arrived.(nraila.org) All of this happened on the 13th of April this year; only a few days ago. This man helped protect someone's belongings. Gun rights can affect all the citizens of the United States and our government. “To conquer a nation first disarm it’s citizens.” (Adolf Hitler) Do we really want to disarm ourselves so someone can easily conquer

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    John Kasich Pros And Cons

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (source 4). The second amendment is most important because it allows the people to intervene if the government is performing tyranny. If we the people were deprived of this right that means that we would be giving up our freedom to fight against…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should the National Government take away gun rights? One, should it be the States rights? If the National Government took away everyone's guns no one could protect themselves. But if citizens are armed they could protect their family, friends and themselves. If everyone is armed they would be safe but also dangerous. It's a right to bear arms but it's the common good that's not everyone is armed, that's where background checks come in. When someone buys a gun they have to be checked for any criminal history.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    to be a safer place to live in. The issue is is very controversial to all Americans and it is an issue that have been argued over and over and it is the time that it should be solves. Based on many sources the conclusion is drawn this way because many factual evidences and viewpoints have shown that guns have create many problems to the country, therefore it should be controlled. This is important to anyone who care about themselves and their love one, and so they should start thinking about how this issue should be…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun Control Essay Example

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There is a major debate going on in the U.S. on gun control. Should people have the right to carry a concealed weapon or should they only be allowed to have a gun in their home? Another question is if the government were to ban guns would that be doing us law-abiding citizens more harm then good? Or maybe they should only allow guns in the hands of people that have had background checks and our licensed to handle them. [C]itizens in Missouri, North Carolina, and Texas are asking their state legislatures for the ability to defend themselves against violent criminal attack regardless of where the attack takes place”(Swasey 175).…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Right To Bear Arms

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It's a great thing that we have gun rights. What if someone broke into your house with a weapon and you were in the same situation as my neighbor, but there were no gun rights and because of that you didn't have a gun to protect yourself? It's a scary thought. The importance of allowing citizens access to guns as a life-saving measure is even more evident as it comes to instances of multiple-victim public shootings at school. There…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate over the restrictions of gun control is centered on the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which gives people the right to bear arms. Gun control supporters believe that this explicit right does not extend to ownership of military-style firearms. For example, groups like the National Rifle Association argue that gun control infringes on the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. Gun control is an on-going debate because each year more people are killed by the use of guns. However, guns are not the result in the number of homicides each year, the problems rests with the irresponsible gun users. Gun Control would do nothing but harm America because guns offer protection and security…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some believe that the government should make gun laws stricter for the safety of them and their family. Others feel that that the gun laws should remain the same, because they don’t want their constitutional rights violated. What is the controversy surrounding this topic? The controversy is that the government believes that the world would be a safer place if the gun laws are stricter. Some feel that their rights would be violated, and the final group of people is the ones who are kind of on both sides. They want the laws to be stricter but they also care about their own rights. The government has to find a solution that will satisfy all three groups of people. They try to find balance amongst the group. Should the…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Is Gun Control Wrong

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Gun Control. This has been a divisive topic for centuries, ever since the creation of guns in the late 1700’s. Many people see guns as their right and often point to the 2nd Amendment in the U.S, which gives all people and groups such as the NRA, the right to carry guns no matter what happens. This is a right which has been laid out and given to all Americans, along with freedom of speech, religion, the press, etc. But on the other hand, in the wake of mass shootings which have now become a trend across the U.S, and rising crime rates following the biggest jump in murder rates from 2015 to 2016, many advocates are supporting increased gun control rates, saying that the times are changing, and that while people should still carry guns, people…

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are so many people on both sides of the issue that it will not ever stop being debated. There are some good points from both sides of the debate. There should be stricter background policies that should be run on people. People should not be allowed to have over 10 rounds for certain types of guns. People should not be allowed to carry AK-47s because these should be used only for military purposes. Americans should be able to defend themselves with presented with danger. In my real opinion, I think gun laws should a lot stricter than they are. These background checks should be way more thorough and if any past wrongdoings or mishaps show up, then their permits should be revoked. The places that sell guns should be checked in on periodically as well. I’m sure these places help people get guns that shouldn’t be getting them. I think it is completely insane to think that American citizens would be safer if everyone were allowed to have guns. There would be more accidental shootings than ever imaginable if this happened. I have owned a gun for several years and have only fired it couple of times to make sure I can use it. I have never had to use it, but I would if my life or family was in danger. I don’t like guns and never have, so I think the gun laws are too weak and should be stricter than they are now. A lot of innocent people would be alive if…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun rights and gun control have different meaning depending with where one lives and the influence they have on one’s life. The debate on gun control has been going on for ages now. There have been people advocating for gun control while others want the control tightened. The federal government has been working on amending current gun regulations to be able to control gun ownership. Owning a gun in the United States is a peculiar American tradition so the Obama government and those who will follow should know that this will not change any time soon. Different states take different stances on the issues and it’s a topic that spurs emotions whenever it is raised.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problem being crimes committed using fire arms. What the Government fails to recognize is that criminals do not abide by the laws, taking weapons away from law abiding citizen will only give the criminals more means to do harm. There is a law against braking and entering but criminals still do it. There is a Law against stealing, yet criminals still continue to steal. So what will taking guns away from Law abiding citizens do? Absolutely nothing other than make citizens more vulnerable to the criminals. While a study was found between 1980 and 2009, shows the States with restrictions on carrying concealed fire arms had higher gun-related murders(ProCon #2). This will also be the first and only Law that amplifies the problem rather than helping. If criminals want to have guns they will find a way to get them. Taking away legally owned guns does not get rid of the illegally owned guns. The Gun Control Law will give criminals the upper hand, they will be more likely to shoot innocent people to get why they want, expectably know there will not be bullet fired back at them. The reason Gun control has not affect on murders is because the killing is not being done people with legally owned…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Having gun control is very important to Americans because it is a sign of protection. We feel if we have guns in our homes we are protected and no one can harm us. Having gun control will limit our freedom that we have in America. Humans feel more protected when they carry weapons. There are a lot of insane people that will harm anybody or anything that gets in their way so when we Americans have the power to carry our own weapon we feel protected. Also if we had restrictions on guns many hunters wouldn’t be able to hunt anymore. There are people who live off of the animals they hunt. With restrictions on guns people would not be able to hunt which mean they wouldn’t have food.…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control is an issue because some people want guns for self-defense,recreation and with some people, maybe to commit violent acts.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control should not be legalized in the U.S. because it is in the constitution the Founding Fathers constructed, it is part of keeping the U.S. safe, it is the part of life in the U.S., and not everyone in the U.S. should go for other people's mistakes. Things were stated that The Constitution was created so that the whole U.S. could be together and functional. If one part of the Constitution is violated then it starts to affect other parts, and people’s rights get violated. The government doesn’t end up using too much power and violate the Constitution. By changing the Constitution Damon Root stated in his own words that, it would ruin everything and how great the U.S. is. National security is important and without it many people’s lives are at risk. The…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays