Describe the structure of DNA.DNA is thread formed by two strands, related together to form a double helix. The double helix looks like a twisted ladder. The sides of this ladder are long unites called nucleotides and are made of three parts; a nitrogenous base, a sugar, and a phosphate group. The sides of the ladder or the nucleotides from the two separate strands of the DNA are attached by an appendage made of one of four separate bases. These appendages represent the rungs of the DNA ladder and are attached to the complimentary strand of the DNA. The bases or rungs are made of either Adenine (A) OR Thymine (T) or Cytosine (C) and Guanine (G). The attachment of the strands by the bases is specific Adenine can only join with Thymine, and Cytosine can only join with Guanine. Since this base pairing is specific, if one knows the sequence of bases a long one strand of the DNA one will also know the strand of the DNA one will also know the sequence along the complimentary strand.…
We run into the problem of money and power when it comes to genetically altering babies. Of course we want to believe that we would do it for the mere health aspect of our children but there are people that would take advantage of this advancement. This is where the restrictions are applied and the reason why this advancement has not taken off as fast as one would think. People are mostly competitive by nature. We compete for everything from love to prizes to recognition and we strive to be the best whether you know it or not.…
Genetic coding allows parents to pick and choose the sex of their baby, the height that their baby will be, how athletic the baby will grow up to be and as genetic coding happens more and more, the more things that we will be able to modify through genetic coding takes away the opportunity that each child will grow up to be whatever/whoever they want to be. Sandel says it best when he says, “To appreciate children as gifts is to accept them as they come, not as objects of our design or products of our will or instruments of our ambition” (Sandel 128), that we should accept and love our children for who they are, to teach them right from wrong and then from there, let them make their own…
Describe each stage of the flow of information starting with DNA and ending with a trait.…
Without the factor of designer babies, there is already competition between who runs faster and who can play better. Although that is the reason for extra-curricular activities, the rise in competition will be an extreme amount if designer babies are thrown into the picture. The fear of having “a race of super humans” (Baird 16) will not only create competition, it will also create a more defined level of social classes because the “genetically enhanced children [will have] an advantage over the children born with the ‘luck of the draw’ genes” (Designer Babies). Another concern that some people have is that messing with the genetics of a human could damage the gene pool and have long term consequences that doctors and scientists have not yet discovered (Baird 16). Similarly, some people wonder that if this procedure was safe then why are animals dying after being genetically engineered. Even if scientists can prefect this process through animals, are multiple humans going to have to die in order for scientists to be able to do this procedure safely and efficiently? Most of these people think it is a stupid risk to jeopardize human lives in order to create “super humans” (Baird…
It is amazing to think that we can choose how our kids will be. Do we want to raise generations of fools or generations of intellects and scholars? Of course we want the latter. We do not want our futures in the hands of incompetent beings, which is why genetic engineering is such a plausible solution. Right now, genetic engineering control is in the hands of government which is where it needs to stay. The ability alter the chemical make-up of a population or food is too much power and responsibility for one person to hand, which is why it needs to be in the watchful eye of our government superiors. We have trusted our government to directly deal with issues we as Americans would rather ignore like war and discrepancies regarding the value of money over the past; consequently, this emphasizes my main idea, which is that genetic engineering should be monitored and overseen by our…
Genetic modification is becoming closer and closer to an everyday possibility. With this possibility comes a whirlwind of possible effects, both positive and negative. There has been a history of opposition towards these technologies, oftentimes because of fear that the capabilities would be abused. However, the potential that newborns could be born free of hereditary diseases outweighs the fear of “designer babies”.…
Human genetic engineering is the process by which the human genome is being modified and manipulated in order to remove or select certain genes. Moreover, traits that are desirable can be selected, and preventing the genetic causes of diseases is possible. Human genetic engineering, as a new field, has raised a lot of questions and ethical issues. I argue about where we should put the limits for our genetic editing. Should we just use it to prevent harmful diseases or can we carry on with the modification and choosing the desirable traits of our future generations? Who decides? Who has the right to object? I will try my best to provide reasonable answers to those questions throughout my series of blogs, based on scientific articles that talk about its controversial and ethical aspects.…
Modifying genes could be a way of preventing unwanted traits or enhance characteristics (Against Designer Babies, Sheldon Krimsky). Unfortunately, CRISPR is a first generation tool, so there is no possibility no damage will be done to the baby. As well as no security, the baby will not have any life-threatening defects, as it is known that “curing” one disease causes another. In fact, this will create a bad relationship between parents and children (The Ethnic of ‘Designer Babies’, Tia Ghose), since the children have no choice in being modified. Using babies to alter their characteristics is using them as science experiments since there are over one hundred genes that account for each trait and fifty genes account for three percent of one gene (Against Designer Babies, Sheldon Krimsky). With many parents willing to allow these experimentations to occur on their baby, it will come at a huge…
I believe that there are choices that come with a science like this. Using genetic engineering to alter people's faces, eye color , or intelligence levels is not ethical or biblical. Ephesians 2:10 states, For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works. This means that God meant to make us the way we look. Altering appearances negates God’s will. However, improving someone's quality of life for the better by removing extensive pain or suffering is God’s will. Cosmetic use of genetic engineering is an uncharted risk that could have unintended consequences ,while also bothering 83% of the population.…
At the begging people will be against it, over the years people will turn over to the change but is that a good thing? If modifying a baby has its good side then it should also have it bad sides. Right now on earth we have over 7 billion people and if everybody besided to start having Designer Babies there will be no individuals why?.. Because everyone will be this extremely intelligent, mega strong non-aging human being. We are not all meant to be the same. If you have a bad gene wear your bad gene. The fact that people can make newborns in to technically robots, is something to think about. Having a Designer Baby means you can choose what your baby looks like,acts like,if they have any allergies if they look more like mom or dad if even if they look them at all. But what would that mean for our future? If all kids become Genetically Modified no one would be different we would all be the same wouldn’t it, because if we all become the ultimate human with zero flaw, there would be individuality. Im talking about shape,strength, intelligents those are all different levels in every human being on earth, if you go in and make everyone's levels has high as they can be, we would be no different than robots. “It is true that Genetic Engineering can cure many diseases but it can lead to new ones as well. How do we know for sure that mixing DNA to…
This quote from Nikola pretty much stated that Eugenics is already present in his day and age and by 2100 it will be something common and done on a regular basis. Furthermore as our development in the medical field advances the process of genomic alteration will be less expensive, safer and more efficient. My position on this topic is more in the middle as I will only be behind it as long as the practices are ethical and the patient is in consent of the operation.…
Would you changed the way your unique child looks or acts? There has been a debate on how scientist should use gene editing. I myself, mostly disagree with the idea of designer babies, but I agree with editing diseases out of humans cells. intelligence, homosexualality & prettiness is mostly determined through confidence, and who you want to be, but also through genes.…
Hereditarily screening our posterity to improve individuals is simply dependable child rearing and an ethical commitment. As guardians we need our children to experience their fullest capacities. Genetically altering babies could be viewed as an "ethical commitment" as it makes them grow up into "morally better kids", this in light of a couple of hereditary connections to 'identity issue. Genetically modifying individuals can help improve the quality of life and overall make up the society by allowing parents to choose the DNA makeup of their offspring.…
Although genetic engineering may seem like the key to a healthy, disease free population not enough is known about genetic engineering, and human genes to make it safe. The human genome is very complicated, often times one sequence of genes has control over multiple different physical attributes of a person, this means that by altering one gene sequence scientists could very easily accidentally alter multiple different attributes of humans. Also scientists have discovered that even when they do introduce a new gene into a DNA strand it is very difficult to decide where, in the DNA strand, that new gene will go. While trying to make humans immune to a disease scientists could very easily alter a different aspect of a human’s DNA, thus creating humans with unwanted genetic defects. These genetic defects would also, most likely, become present in that persons reproductive cells, and any children they had would acquire the genetic defects present in their parent. These genetic defects could actually cause these humans to be more prone to certain diseases that before. With Genetic engineering there is too much room for error, and any mistakes made could lead to entire populations of genetically mutated humans.While it would be beneficial to the human race to use genetic engineering there would be the unavoidable issue of class. If there were genetically superior humans, then there would consequently be those who would be genetically inferior. This would lead to a class system of rich super-humans with the normal humans thrust into poverty. There have been several stories where these theoretical societies have been postulated.Before birth babies were classified as being in different castes and were conditioned the rest of their pre-birth through chemical regimens that either strengthened them or stunted their growth physically and mentally. The society was very balanced therefore, but was also very controlled and unpleasant for any who did not fit in to…