Preview

Do Adolescents Make Autonomous Medical Choices?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
576 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Do Adolescents Make Autonomous Medical Choices?
Do adolescents have the right to make autonomous medical choices? This question is asked very frequently all around, and is given various answers. This topic places medical decisions at the forefront, meaning that the topic touches on questions of terminal illnesses, pregnancy, sexual transmitted diseases, palliative care, and all the other types of decisions that minors have to make. Merriam-Webster defines “adolescent” as “A young person who is developing into an adult; a young person who is going through adolescence, and Merriam-Webster defines “adolescence” as “1. The state or process of growing up; 2. The period of life from puberty to maturity terminating legally at the age of majority; 3. A stage of development (as of a language or …show more content…
Most scientific studies that have been conducted in relation to adolescents generally indicate that by age 14, adolescents have reached the point where they are capable of making decisions that are at least on par with the decision making capacity of young adults. Most medical professionals, especially those who work extensively with adolescents, recognize some tension in the belief that adolescents need to be treated as children. In the status quo, the age of 18 is treated as a magical number, at which point adolescents have reached the point where they are capable of making choices for themselves. Still, the treatment of adolescents across different segments of our society creates some problems with even this magical number. For instance, the fact that adolescents can, and often are, tried as adults for criminal acts they comment indicate that at least in some circumstances, society is willing to set aside the magical number 18, and recognize the ability of adolescents to make competent decisions, at least in as far as they are competent enough to be punished for their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Teens are not always aware of the consequences to their actions and they take risks. The general argument made by Richard A. Serrano in his work, Young killers serving life without parole may get chance at freedom, is that juveniles who commit heinous crimes are not fully aware of their actions. More specifically, Serrano argues that juveniles are not fully matured and juveniles should not be charged as adults. The author asserts, “Adolescents, because of their immaturity, should not be deemed as culpable as adults…”(Serrano). In this passage, Serrano is suggesting that immaturity leads teens to act inappropriate for their age because they have not yet become adults. Serrano also states, “But they also are not innocent children whose crimes…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roper Vs Simmons Case Study

    • 2284 Words
    • 10 Pages

    It was noted that while juveniles are capable of committing truly heinous crimes, they are not fully culpable for three main reasons. The first reason discussed was that juveniles under the age of eighteen lack the maturity and responsibility that adults have attained. This shortcoming causes decisions and subsequent actions to be poorly thought out. Basically, juveniles are not responsible decision makers. This idea was supported by the fact that most states do not allow minors to vote, do jury duty, or get married without consent. The second rationale for why juveniles are less culpable than adults dealt with environment. It was suggested that juveniles lack control over their environment. They do not have the ability to remove themselves from an environment that encourages delinquency. Finally, juveniles are less culpable because they are still developing a sense of self identity. This suggests that behaviors exhibited now may not be part of their character in five or ten years, allowing for recovery. The majority then argued that the same reasoning they used in Stanford v. Kentucky applied to Roper v. Simmons, and that the eighth amendment did not allow for the execution of people under age eighteen due to lesser culpability (Counsel of Record,…

    • 2284 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The majority advances their argument by listing some of the mental differences between adults and juveniles such as: “susceptibility to immature behavior”, lack of control over their environment and the peers that come with it, the ability to undergo a character change. These factors were enough for the Court to find the age group a suspect class and hold that they have diminished culpability, at least to an extent that the death penalty becomes an excessive…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Ethical Dilema

    • 2961 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Abstract This article will explore pediatric consent through the analysis of a clinical case study using the principles of biomedical ethics approach. Application of the principles of autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice will be dissected in order to attempt to establish resolution of the ethical dilemma. The main conflict in this case study deals with whether the wishes of an adolescent for end-of-life care should be followed or should the desire of his parents outweigh this request. In terminal cancer, the hope of early palliative care and dignity in dying serve as priorities in therapy. Application of the moral principles to both sides of the dilemma aided in providing an objective resolution to uphold pediatric consent. Keywords Consent, case study, decision-making capacity, end of life, ethics, pediatric oncology…

    • 2961 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this case, Roper v. Simmons, Kennedy has once again shown himself to be one of the most powerful legal activists of our times, ready to impose his own sense of morality and law upon the rest of society. In his majority opinion, Justice Kennedy cited “the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society” and the court find the death penalty for juveniles to be cruel and unusual punishment, and thus unconstitutional. Moreover, Justice Kennedy turned to psychology as the platform for his argument. He stated that adolescents under age of 18 lack maturity and have “a underdeveloped sense of responsibility. Secondly, he stated that juveniles are ““more vulnerable or susceptible to negative influences and outside pressures, including peer pressure.” Finally, he argued that “the character of a juvenile is not as well formed as that of an adult. The personality traits of juveniles are more transitory, less fixed.” With the backing of American Psychological Association’s reasoning and Supreme Court’s majority opinion, the Roper decision will go down as one more milestones in the U.S. Supreme Court’s project of judicial activism and taking moral values into…

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clearly there are legal and ethical issues that exist when it comes to Minors’ rights to refuse medical tests requested by their parents. In the United States, the legal system generally gives complete authority for medical decision making to parents, giving way to ethical issues that arise when caring for mature minors who are refusing medical procedures requested by their parents. In case study 1, the parents are requesting that their teenage daughter Camilla undergo invasive medical testing that she is opposed to. Because Camilla is a mature minor, the most important ethical issues that exist in this case is the violation of Camilla’s right to autonomy and self-determination, and nonmaleficence because she is both psychologically and physically opposed to the genetic testing requested by her parents. The ethical principles that should be used to help guide the care of Camilla, her family, and the healthcare providers involved in this case are Autonomy and Nonmaleficence.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ethical article I chose to reflect upon discusses the ethical case of a teenager being forced into chemotherapy at the age of seventeen. This case is a difficult one, due to Cassandra still being underaged. With all these components in mind, I disagree with what the law/court decided Cassandra’s solution be. She should not have been forced into being administered chemotherapy by any means, even if she was still technically a minor. The law states that if you are a minor, you have to have parental permission to undergo a certain task or in this case, refuse treatment. So, it is also unethical to deny her mother the right to see or speak to her daughter after the court decided against them both.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The essay “Little Adult Criminals” by the New York Times Editorial argues that children of the age 12 or 14 do not have sufficient emotional maturity to control their own impulses or understand their actions and the consequences that come with them, and therefore should not be tried in adult criminal court. The essay gives examples of two 14 year old boys, Lionel Tate and Nathaniel Brazill, who were both charged with murder. This article also includes medical research that shows that teenagers’ brains are still developing to back up their argument that teensagers should not be tried as adults. It also includes studies that have shown that minors who go through the juvenile system are less likely to be arrested again after being released since they are provided rehabilitation, unlike those who serve time in an ordinary prison. This article advances the argument that young teenagers should not be tried in adult criminal court and uses scientific evidence and past cases to back up their argument.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Teenagers accused of violent crimes should not be tried as adults in a court of the law. Teenagers brains are not fully developed, from the ages 13-18 a projected number of, “one percent of gray matter is lost every year in teenagers,” and these are the teens being tried as adults in court (Spinks). A growth of gray matter is an important development stage in teens. The gray matter grows mostly when the brain is stimulated through accelerated learning, social interactions and in athletics. In a teenagers brain, the stimulation occurs in the prefrontal cortex, which is located behind the forehead. If teenagers are not given the opportunity to plead their case in court, it can lead to other developmental issues. These issues can stunt other brain growths in teenagers. Thus, the growth of the frontal cortex is a study in teenage brain development. The frontal cortex becomes enhanced during young adult years, which can conclude to an undeveloped brain in teens. The adult punishments brought upon teenagers is discriminatory because of the slower brain development in teenagers. Many neuroscientists have concluded that, teenagers have a, “very immature brain structure” (Spinks). Adults have mature frontal lobes, as opposed to teenagers with non-developed and immature frontal lobes. Although the brain maturity in teens is an issue, adults continue to be biased regarding teenage crimes. Adults must consider brain development in teenagers when any teen is being accused of a crime.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the age of 16 teens need to be able to take responsibility for their actions. How could they ever get jobs or even be successful adults if they don’t take responsibly. A response from Debate.org argues, “Minors should be tried as adults because they made the same mistakes as adults. If they had the guts to…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juvenile Justice

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Krikorian, Greg. "Many Kids Called Unfit for Adult Trial: Those Under 15 Often Blind to the Long-Term Results of Their Choices, a Study Says." The Sacramento Bee 3 Mar. 2003: 52-53. Print.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Today, minors are using their age as a shield against capital punishment. Adolescents believe that since they are not eighteen they will not be punished for the crimes they commit. The death penalty is appropriate for juveniles in certain circumstances, such as murder and brutal crimes that are considered capital offenses. The rate at which the death penalty is carried out, as well as inconstancies in sentencing does not make it a deterrent. There should not be an age limit in all capital offenses for those who could face the death penalty. Adolescents should know what he or she are doing is wrong, and is a crime. An age limits does not predict when one is able to handle responsibilities. What they do is assume is that one should be able to take on new responsibilities, laws, and issues. One is not suddenly capable of driving at sixteen, and not immediately given the knowledge of the voting system at eighteen. How does a specific age predict when a person knows right from wrong? Though many people have different view points on capital punishment, present the background, arguments, and information on juveniles and the death penalty need to be analyzed.…

    • 1826 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today’s court system has many difficult decisions to make everyday. One of the most controversial decisions is whether or not try certain juveniles as adults or not. On one hand, being tried as a minor is considered unconstitutional, while on the other side it seems necessary in order to protect society. Some of the factors the court considers when convicting a minor is “age, physical and mental maturity, past attempts and future potential for rehabilitation, harm suffered by the victim, use of a firearm, and public safety” (“) Many minors who have been convicted came from unstable homes, lived in poverty, or have been physically abused. (“Children” 1). Factors such as these make it hard for people to decide if minors should be tried as adults. However, before making a decision, it is important to learn all…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kathryn Hickey has a bachelor’s degree in Registered Nursing and works at Shriners Hospital for Children in Chicago. She is a credible source as she often deals with children or adolescents and is highly knowledgeable about the topic. Her article, “Minors’ Rights in Medical Decision Making”, was placed in the journal called JONA’s Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation. This journal provides information on the changing regulations of healthcare and is…

    • 1854 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freedom, in itself, is a basic human right. Without freedom, you cannot pursue life as it was meant to be lived. Adolescents, no matter what age, race, or gender, should have the freedom to choose the way they live out their days autonomously. Therefore, I believe that adolescents should have the right to make autonomous medical choices if they are mature enough and can understand the consequences of the decision about to be made.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays