Preview

Do Binaries Exist in Human Nature?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1458 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Do Binaries Exist in Human Nature?
Here “binaries” refers to opposites, while human rationality is the way the mind thinks or uses logic. Therefore, the meaning of this statement is that the human mind believes that most things have an opposite. Now it is true that generally the human mind thinks in binaries but this belief that everything has an opposite is flawed and incorrect. This essay will add a third dimension to the argument and will prove that how that belief is flawed. We can see how most of us believe that everything has an opposite, for whenever we think opposites we say, yes, there is light and dark, good and evil, yin and yang. However there are two flaws to this. Firstly, this is a fallacy of over-generalization as not everything can have an opposite. Secondly, the examples of opposites stated above are some of the most obvious examples that come to our mind. Therefore, we need to initially look at what the meaning of “opposite” is. Opposite as a noun has 3 meanings:
1) One that is opposite or contrary to another,
2) An opponent or antagonist,
3) An antonym.
Looking at these three meanings we can infer that all three of them relatively mean the same thing. So now we must see in what way do we mean opposite. As in, do we mean a true opposite or do we mean an abstract opposite. We cannot consider an abstract opposite. An abstract opposite of something would be a “not-IT”. This is the logic used when people say that the opposite of a cat is a dog. But then again a parrot could also be an opposite of a cat. And with the logic that if two things are opposite to one thing then they must be the same, would mean that a dog and parrot is the same thing which is fundamentally incorrect. Another example is that of “What is the opposite of a spoon?” Some say to this “Fork”. But then what becomes of the knife? Therefore, we should consider a true opposite. Now how can we consider an opposite? Would a true opposite be something that is different from the original in its characteristics?

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hum130 R7 Daoism

    • 760 Words
    • 3 Pages

    a. The principle of yang and yin is that all things exist as inseparable and contradictory opposites, for example femal-male, dark-light and old-young. The two opposites attract and complement each other and, as their symbol illustrates, each side has at ites core an element of the other (represented by the small dots). Neither pole is uperior to the other and, as an increase in one brings a corresponding decrease in the other, a correct balance between the two poles must be reaches in order to achieve harmony.…

    • 760 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Answer: The concept of reverse discrimination is when women and minorities are selected for jobs that white males are more qualified for. Quotas are then established, if a qualified person would not be found for the job, then the unqualified applicants would be hired or no one white male would be selected at all.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ender Wiggin Quotes

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “Two faces of the same coin….The problem with coins is when one side is up the other side is down.” ( 276 )…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trying to prove his arguments, Socrates presents two proofs – Doctrine of Opposites and second which is based on Theory of Recollections. In Phaedo he writes: “That soul, I say, herself invisible, departs to the invisible world – to the divine and immortal and rational…”. In this quote, Plato uses the first argument about Opposites of things. He implies that while the body dies and decomposes, the soul still lives. In other words, if the body must cease, the soul should be immortal because it is the body’s opposite. There are a lot of examples from Doctrine of Opposites which are given by Phaedo and Socrates. Moreover, according to Socrates’ definition – one opposite thing comes from another opposite as well. For instance, increasing and decreasing, cooling and heating, separation and combination, etc. Let’s take the example of being asleep and being awake. If you are not sleeping, then you are awake, or on the contrary – if you are not awake, then you are sleeping. These two actions could not exist at the same time because when you are sleeping it is impossible to be awakened. Indeed, sleep comes from being awake. Consequently, there must be first condition before the second – in order to become awakened firstly we should be sleeping. The same we know with life and death – when a man ceases to exist anymore, he dies. But if one comes from another, thus there should be opposite action – life after dying.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Transcendentalism and Anti-Transcendentalism have almost polar opposite views of human nature. They have opposing views on acquiring wisdom and trust. Also, Transcendentalism and Anti transcendentalism have conflicting optimistic and pessimistic views.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The “Principle of Opposites” presented by Jung demonstrates there is an opposite to an action, personality and/or behavior in physical energy.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cyclical Argument, or Opposites Argument explains that Forms are eternal and unchanging, and as the soul always brings life, then it must not die, and is necessarily "imperishable". As the body is mortal and is subject to physical death, the soul must be its indestructible opposite. Plato then suggests the analogy of fire and cold. If the form of cold is imperishable, and fire, its opposite, was within close proximity, it would have to withdraw intact as does the soul during death. This could be likened to the idea of the opposite charges of magnets.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    who identifies with Plato’s views, can point out the argument from opposites as a defense. The argument of opposites explains the relationship of how things come to be from the existence of their opposite. Melinda could explain to Melissa that, as known, with sleeping comes being awake and with day emerges night. Having said that, she can relate this certainty to death and life. As Socrates says, “Then there is a new way in which we arrive at the inference that the living come from the dead, just as the dead come from the living; and if this is true, then the souls of the dead must be…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Parmenides: the Real Being

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Parmenides, as did Heraclitus before him, wrote about a state known as "What Is." However, they differed sharply in their view of that state. Parmenides insisted that "What Is" be viewed as a constant. Heraclitus' focus was on elements transferring to and from opposites. Parmenides concentrated on a sense of "being." Heraclitus believed in a flux or "Yin and Yang" in the world that promoted harmony and stability, "What is opposed brings together, the finest harmony is composed of things at variance." (pg29, frg49) For Parmenides, "What Is" leads us to the truth about our universe, in that it is timeless, eternal, motionless, perfectly uniform, the same all throughout. "There are signs that being ungenerated, it is also imperishable." (pg38, frg8) He believed there was never any change in the universe just as Heraclitus believed it is a constantly changing circle. Parmenides' definition for "What Is" was simple. There weren't many requirements, "Whole and of a single kind and unshaken and complete." If the state of being fits his requirements then it was "What Is." However, his requirements, as simple as they are, are so broad that they exclude most, if not all, of the entire physical world. In response to Heraclitus, Parmenides argued that "What Is" could not change out of what it is; therefore, no opposite can exist. All of his descriptions of "What Is" led his contemporaries and followers to understand that "What Is" is not physical in a way that can be described. While his claims of "What Is" might suggest otherwise, it was not Parmenides' goal to throw the traditional vision of the cosmos out the window. He was merely searching for a clearer distinction between truth and appearance. Parmenides believed that "What Is" was so pure that it would hold the basis of truth for everything that has happened in the past and will happen in the future.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Review Asian 104

    • 5908 Words
    • 18 Pages

    anything in the universe: the yang is considered to be the positive, active, and (manifestly) strong force, while the yin the negative, passive, yielding force. In a narrow sense, it means two complementary fluid-force elements within qi whose mix determines the existence of all things in the universe. The yin and yang are inter-dependent, inter-penetrating, inter-transformational, and harmoniously balanced; these features are represented by the dot at the heart of each half of the flowing circle in the yin-yang diagram: . In some conventional accounts, the yang is depicted in terms of the sun, light male, summer, dry, dominant, upper, active, etc., while the yin in terms of the moon, dark, female, winter, moist, receptive, submissive, lower, passive, etc.…

    • 5908 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Truth and Plato

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Melinda could argue that all things have an opposite, including the soul. Plato’s first argument…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Does God Allow Evil?

    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many people dispute the true intentions of God, himself, since the beginning of mankind. Opposing and concurring arguments can be just as primitive. Regardless of personal perspective on any indefinite theory, it is undeniable that the controversy between good and evil will inevitably exist. Two dominant philosophers discussed in “The Problem of Evil” are Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and David Hume. Both of these authors discuss interesting motives from both sides of the issue: why and why not God should allow evil.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Heraclitus has been explained to be an obscure philosopher and whose works have shown to be open to different interpretations. In his work he affirms both change and becoming by using his famous quote, “One may never step in the same river twice,” which in logical thought is written in simple terms for the common people to understand. The two concepts, change and becoming, are thought in terms of life and death: what is overcomes that which is not and vice-versa, and that a quality is more or less conquered by its opposite and causing both to be in constant war. His views on the universe were that of eternity by his belief of the universe being constantly existent; it was never created and cannot be destroyed. On his views of opposites Heraclitus believed that nature is made up mainly of two movements which he explained to be: the upward path and the downward path. The downward path, being the process of life, is like when fire transforms into air, then water and finally earth. The upward path happens in the opposite way, meaning earth changes to water, then air, then fire. Withal, Heraclitus held his belief that the two paths are in fact part of the same process and so they are ultimately the same thing. Like the universe, he believed that it has also existed eternally and cannot be subject to change.…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    the crucible act 2

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages

    a statement that seems true but at the same time seems to also have an opposite truth…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics