Preview

Do Human Beings Have All the Rights to Domesticate Animals?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
283 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Do Human Beings Have All the Rights to Domesticate Animals?
I agree to a certain extent that human beings have all the right to domesticate animals since they are the superior species.
Human beings are concerned about losing their “diversity” if they no longer have the domesticated animals. Domestication is not morally acceptable and these domesticated animals are not natural at all as they are created by us through selective breeding and confinement. Humans should first protect those undomesticated animals living in nature and then use them for biological purposes.
However, the many domesticated animals that we have today have influenced our society and technology advancement significantly over the years. The relationship between human and animals provide mutual benefits. Without these animals, the society might have remained restless and mobile. We might even never have developed the culture we have currently. If there was no advantage to the animal, it would not stay. So, domesticated animals received and gave benefits – they got food, protection and a much easier life compared to those in the wild. And we got food supplies, transport, protection and hunting assistance. Domestication of animals might be selfish, but it sure has some advantages to the animal because they live longer lives and do not have the need to hunt for food anymore.
These animals are dependent on humans for when they eat, whether they have water, where and when they relieve themselves, when they sleep, whether they get exercise and more. They are neither part of the nonhuman world nor fully part of the world. They will forever remain in a world of vulnerability and defenseless, always in our control. We humans have bred them to have certain characteristics which are harmful to them but pleasing to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Some animals can only live in a certain climate, therefore many places don’t have practical working animals to help them harvest food and spare them the extra work. But it’s not just working animals. For example, sheep, which are often kept for wool, can’t be found in warm climates such as Papua New Guinea because it doesn’t need to grow wool to stay warm. Domesticating animals is difficult because of the specific criteria the animal has to fit. They can’t be vicious and have to be pretty large with some muscle power. Nevertheless, it’s preferable that they’re herbivores. Any meat that people gather they’re going to want to keep and eat themselves for protein, they aren’t going to want to feed it to their animal. Also, their animals won’t eat them if it gets hungry. Another factor is that they be able to…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Domesticating animals means humans no longer follow them, and instead use them as a function of economics (barter, labor, etc.)…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals and humans were created to coexist on this earth and therefore should receive fair treatment. Many cannot fathom the idea of initiating legal rights for animals. Some may even perceive it as absurd to dedicate and focus time on non-human animals. The main problem is that humans have advanced significantly, establishing a complex intellect that other species lack. Humans possess many capabilities that are distinct from those of others.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The validity of the term, animal welfarism is only true if these non-human individuals are in fact intrinsically valuable. This means that animals can attain value of their own, distinct from financial value that is endorsed by human individuals in which humans have a degree of duty to them, such as treating them humanely. Emerging from this is the question of whether or not humans are willing to separate the meaning of animals having their own value from financial value humans impose on them. The term intrinsic value is supposed to improve an animals living condition, but it has no effect or does the exact opposite; the term is merely used as a “mask-effect” supposedly making us think that they are living in a good environment, when it does not in fact benefit the…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The use of animals for human benefits has always been a controversial topic. It is still unanswered whether the use of animals for human advantages is valid. Animal activists think that using animals for human advantages can never be good, whereas few researchers and scientists think that animals are necessary for human welfare. "Proud to be Speciesist" by Stephen Rose, talk about the issue of animal rights but present a totally contrasting viewpoints toward use of animals. The authors talk about using animals for human benefits in different approach. Rose's essay looks at a specific, personal view on the topic. Rose contradicts saying that human welfare and survival is more important than animal rights and argues that using animals for research is acceptable.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    RSPCA SPEECH

    • 823 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Now, why should we look after animals, surely they are something that we could just use as a luxury? Why do we have to help animals in general? This may sound silly and unusual but actually we are all animals … every single person in this room is an animal, every single person in this world is an animal. All we are, are just adapted animals ( so we have not got any fur, we can permanently stand on two feet, we don’t have a tail or any different features like that, we don’t have noticeable hair everywhere, only where we necessarily think or want in that case. We have hardly any…

    • 823 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Are Zoos Good Or Good

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    If we were to release them back into their natural habitat they will have difficulty in either finding a food source or being able to tell who is a poacher or a wildlife ranger. Animals who have been captive for most of their life are dependent of their caregivers and are not suited to be in their natural habitat. Most animals won’t get accepted into a herd or be able to adapt to that kind of lifestyle which they have never experienced. In the following passages I will explain the main reasons why I strongly believe that animals that have been held in captivity should remain in…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Humans care for their animals because animals can’t live on their own. Animals are able to live every day because of humans. We give them proper food, water and a place to live. People also talk to their animals because they love and care for them.…

    • 347 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why should the rights that were fought for by our late independent heroes and civil right activists be extended to non-human animals that could not socially speak for themselves? Since animals do not have the capacity to personally fight for their rights, granting what humans had put in their blood for to enjoy to non-human animals will be a scenario of robbing Peter to pay Paul and hence an injustice to humans. Therefore animal rights movement is simply a misguided attempt to force people to grant animals the same qualities, needs and desires as human beings. While this movement is born out of kindness and sympathy, I think it is completely misguided because non-human animals are in actual sense, equal to human beings and hence do not deserve equal right as enjoyed by human…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Do Animals Captive?

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages

    trouble with this is that once these animals are bred, they are raised in captivity as well, leading…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout history morality has been a topic of intense debate. Innumerable thinkers have devoted immense amounts of time and energy to the formulation of various ethical theories intended to assist humans in their daily lives. These theories set out guidelines which help to determine the rightness or wrongness of any given action and can therefore illuminate which choice would be morally beneficial. And while many of these theories differ substantially, most have at least one common underlying principle, namely that humans deserve to be treated with a certain level of respect. This idea comes from the belief that all humans have interests which are significant enough to be considered, hence no one should impede another from fulfilling their own individual interests. Yet recently a new controversy has emerged at the forefront of ethical debate, the status of animals within our distinctly human-oriented world. For thousands of years man has used animals as nothing more than a mere means, raising and slaughtering them for food, hunting them for food as well as sport, and more recently using them as test subjects to ensure an assortment of products are safe for use by humans. However, as time has passed and the overall level of enlightenment within our societies has increased, many have begun to question these aforementioned practices, maintaining that animals, like humans have interests and therefore should have the ability to seek the satisfaction inherent in attaining those interests. The answer reached in regards to this question varies immensely depending on the specific ethical theory utilized. Some theories dictate that only humans should receive moral consideration, while other wish to extend this consideration towards not only animals but inanimate objects as well. For the purpose of this essay I will examine the issue of animal rights from both a utilitarian and a Kantian perspective. I intend to show that ultimately a utilitarian outlook is…

    • 3188 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Bill Of Rights

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Now in my opinion, I believe that animals should have an official “Bill of Rights”. They have emotions and show signs of intelligence. I believe that we need to draft a legal “Bill of Rights” for animals. Simple laws should be, and already are, in place to protect animals to some extent but there is more that could be done. Currently, the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) remains the only federal law that regulates the treatment of animals [1]. I believe that the AWA is enough protection for animals, we don’t need additional legislation on top of this and similar…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determining the rights of non-human animals and deciding how to treat them may not be a choice available to our human society. As an advocate for the rights of animals, Tom Reganʻs three main goals are to abandon the use of animals in any scientific research, discontinue all commercial animal agriculture, and to completely terminate both commercial and sport animal hunting. To support these intentions, Regan argues that every human and non-human animal possesses inherent value, which makes them all more than a physical object or vessel. He then states that possessing inherent value allows every human and non-human to have rights of their own. To further his argument, Regan claims that the any human and non-human retaining rights requires equal treatment and respect from others. To conclude his argument, Regan states that due to these reasons, non-human animals cannot be treated as resources and must be treated by humans as equals. In this paper, I object to Reganʻs third premise, which states that non-human and human animals must be treated as equals and with respect, because our communication barrier with non-human animals restricts us from determining their notion of equal treatment or respect, and that attempting to do so could…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Captivity

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The problem with animal captivity is its hurting animals mentally and physically Captive exotic animals are abused and exploited in a variety of settings including research, product testing, the entertainment industry and fur farms. Keeping wild animals in captivity is inherently cruel, as it deprives them of the ability to freely enjoy their natural behaviors in their natural environment. Every year captive exotic animals are involved in incidents where humans are injured or killed.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While it cannot be denied that humans are the most intelligent and complex creatures on earth, it is my firm belief that animals also deserve respect and appreciation. I believe they are necessary in our lives, as we are in…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays