Preview

Do Mergers and Acquisitions Create Shareholder Value

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
7268 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Do Mergers and Acquisitions Create Shareholder Value
Do Mergers and Acquisitions Create Shareholder Wealth In The Pharmaceutical Industry?
Mahmud Hassan, Dilip K. Patro, Howard Tuckman and Xiaoli Wang*
Purpose: This paper analyzes mergers and acquisitions (M&A) focusing on the U.S. pharmaceutical industry in the period 1981-2004. This industry is chosen because it is global, engages intensively in M&A which it uses to both complement and substitute for early stage research, and because the potential abnormal returns to blockbuster drugs are substantial. It is our assumption that if abnormal returns to M&A exist in the short and long run, this is the industry to find them.
Design: Our study examines short term abnormal returns separating mergers from acquisitions and US-based from foreign-based M&A targets. We examined 405 mergers and acquisitions during 1981-2004 to address the issues of our research.
Findings: Evidence of short and long term abnormal returns, as well as accounting and efficiency effects are found for acquisitions but not for mergers, however, our tests do suggest that mergers with US-based targets are not value destroying. We also find differences as to the effects of acquisitions of foreign-based, as opposed to US-based targets.
Value: Taken in total our results provide support for the view that, at least in the pharmaceutical industry, acquisitions of US-based companies have a positive impact on wealth creation for company shareholders.
Key Words: Pharmaceutical, M&A, Stock Performance
Category: Research Paper

1. Introduction Whether acquiring company shareholders experience a wealth effect from mergers and acquisitions is a matter of ongoing debate among academic researchers[[i]]. Some argue that mergers and acquisitions (M&A) create synergies that benefit both the acquiring company and the consumers (e.g., Weston, Mitchell and Mulherin, 2004). Others argue that M&A activities create agency problems, resulting in less than optimal returns (e.g., Jensen, 1986).



References: Agrawal, A., Jaffe, J. F. and Mandelker, G. N. (1992), “The Post-Merger Performance of Acquiring Firms: A Re-examination of an Anomaly”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 47, pp. 1605-1621. Andrade, G., Mitchell, M. and Stafford, E. (2001), “New Evidence and Perspectives on Mergers”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 103-120. André, P., Kooli, M. and L’Her, J. (2004), “The Long-Run Performance of Mergers and Acquisitions: Evidence from the Canadian Stock Market”, Financial Management, Vol. 33, pp. 27-43. Asquith, P., Bruner, R. and Mullins, D. (1983), “The gains to bidding firms from merger”, Journal of Financial Economics , Vol. 11, pp. 121-139. Berndt, E, (2001), “The U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry: Why Major Growth in Times of Cost Containment?”, Health Affairs, Vol. 20, No. 2 , pp. 100-114. Bottazzi, G; Dosi, G.; Lippi, M.; Pammolli, F.; and Riccaboni, M., (2001) “Innovation and Corporate Growth in the Evolution of the Drug Industry”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 19, No. 7, pp. 1161-1188. Black, E. ; Carnes, T. A; and Jandik, T. (2001), “The Long-Term Success of Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions”, SSRN working paper http://ssrn.com/abstract=270288. Bloomberg News, (2006, Feb. 15), “Pfizer’s Lipitor Keeps Top Spot Even as Growth Slows”, www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&sid=a0Azwbrr6Slo . Brown, S., and Warner, J. (1980), “Measuring Security Price Performance”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 8, pp. 205-258. Brown, S., and Warner, J. (1985), “Using Daily Stock Returns: The Case of Event Studies”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 14, pp. 3-31. Conn, R. L., Cosh, A. D., Guest, P. M. and Hughes, A. (2001), “Long-run Share Performance of U.K. Firms Engaging in Cross-border Acquisitions”, ESRC Center for Business Research. Danzon, P. M., Epstein, A., and Nicholson, S. (2004), “Mergers Acquisitions in the Pharmaceutical and Biotech Industries”, NBER working paper. Fishman, M. J., (1988), “A Theory of Preemptive Takeover Bidding”, RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 29, No.1, pp. 88-101. Firth, M., (1980), “Takeovers, Shareholder Returns, and the Theory of the Firm”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 94, pp. 235-260. Gugler, K., Mueller, D. C. ,Yurtoglu, B. and Zulehner, C. (2003), “The Effects of Mergers: An International Comparison”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 625–653. Hamel, G and Prahalad, C. K. (1994), “Competing for the Future”, Harvard University Press, Boston. Healy, P. M, Palepu, K. G. and Ruback, R. S. (1992), “Does Corporate Performance Improve After Mergers?” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp.135-176. Hogarty, T. F. (1970), “The Profitability of Corporate Mergers”, Journal of Business, Vol. 3 , pp. 317–27. Huang, Y., and Walkling, R. (1987), “Target Abnormal Returns Associated with Acquisition Announcements: Payment, Acquisition Form, and Managerial Resistance”, The Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 29-349. Jensen, M. C., (1986), “Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow: Corporate Finance, and Takeovers”, American Economic Review, Vol. 76, pp. 323-329. Jensen, Michael; Ruback, R. S. (1983), “The Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 11, pp. 5-50. Loderer, C., Martin, K. (1992), “Post-acquisition Performance of Acquiring Firms”, Financial Management, Vol. 21, pp. 69-79. Loughran, T. and A. M. Vijh, A. M. (1997), “Do Long-Term Shareholders Benefit from Corporate Acquisitions”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 52, pp. 1765-1790. Lyon, J., Barber, B. and Tsai, C. (1999), “Improved Methods for Tests of Long-Run Abnormal Stock Returns”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 54, pp. 165-201. Mitchell, M. L., and Mulherin, J. H. (1996), “The Impact of Industry Shocks on Takeover and Restructuring Activity”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 41, pp. 193-229. Moeller, S. B., Schlingemann, F. P. and Stulz, R. M., (2004), “Firm Size and the Gains from Acquisitions”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 73, pp. 201-228. Nicholson, S., and J. McCullough, (2002), “Biotech-Pharmaceutical Alliances as a Signal of Asset and Firm Quality”, NBER working paper. Shleifer, A. and ishny, R. M. (1989), “Management Entrenchment: The Case of Manager-Specific Investment”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 25, pp. 123-139. Singal, V., (1996), “Airline Mergers and Competition: An Integration of Stock and Product Price Effects”, Journal of Business, Vol. 69, pp. 233-268. Travlos, N. G., (1987), “Corporate Takeover Bids, Methods of Payment, and Bidding Firms ' Stock Returns”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp.943-963. Weston, J. F., Mitchell, M. and Mulherin, L. (2004), Takeovers, Restructuring, and Corporate Governance, 4th edition, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Henry, David (2002), "Mergers: Why Most Big Deals Don 't Pay Off", Business Week, October 14, 2002.…

    • 2202 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ernst & Young (1994), Mergers and Acquisitions, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, pp. 234-9. Retrieved 2012-02-03…

    • 999 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Extended Essay

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In order to achieve economic goals, stay competitive and improve market position, firms have to advance with times by executing all kinds of strategies, one of which is acquisition. “An acquisition resembles more of an arm’s-length deal, with one firm purchasing the assets or shares of another, and with the acquired firm’s shareholders ceasing to be owners of that firm” (Sudarsanam, 2003). Serving as an important capital restructuring tool, acquisition offers firms a conceivable opportunity for development by taking over another firm economically and legally. This essay aims to demonstrate that initially firms can achieve growth by the means of the acquisition of another firm, but the long-term effect of acquisition appears to be a double-edged sword. Targeted financial indicators will be cited to support this view, and different factors, which include stock market value, shareholders’ income, firm management, external pressure, supply of resources and internal cooperation, will be discussed respectively.…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Finance

    • 5399 Words
    • 22 Pages

    Nakamura, H.R. (2005) Motives, Partner Selection and Productivity Effects of M&As: The Pattern of Japanese Mergers and Acquisition, Thesis (Ph.D.), Institute of International Business, Stockholm School of Economics.…

    • 5399 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Managing Across Borders

    • 1862 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Harford J., 2005, September, “What drives merger waves?”, Journal of Financial Economics, Volume 77, Issue 3.…

    • 1862 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Lipitor Product Launch

    • 3553 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Gatyas, Gary (2011). “IMS Health Forecasts Global Pharmaceutical Market Growth of 5-7 Percent in 2011, Reaching $880 Billion.” IMS Health…

    • 3553 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    financial statements that arise under the two accounting methods: merger (pooling-ofinterests) (Add together the book values of the assets and liabilities of the two…

    • 25100 Words
    • 101 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Business standard, 2007. ‘M&A Creating more value with less proportion of over payments’. Cited on 21/11/2009…

    • 13712 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Cosh, A., Hughes, A., Lee, K., & Singh, A. (1998). “Takeovers, institutional investment and the…

    • 4285 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    8. Lichtenberg, F. and Siegel, D. (1990). The effects of leveraged buyouts on productivity and related aspects of firm behaviour. Journal of Financial Economics. 9. Lubatkin, M. and Chatterjee, S. (1994). Extending modern portfolio theory into the domain of corporate diversification: Does it apply?. Academy of Management Journal, 37, pp. 109-136. 10. Pinegar, M. and Wilbricht, L. (1989). What Managers Think of Capital Structure Theory: A Survey. Financial Management, Winter, pp. 82-91. 11. Smith, A. (1990). Corporate ownership structure and performance. The case of Management Buyouts. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, pp.143-164. 12. McConnell, J. and Muscarella, C. (1985). Corporate capital expenditure decisions and the market value of firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 14, pp. 399-422. 13. Modigliani, F. and Miller, M. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance, and the theory of investment. American economic Review 48, June, 261-197. 14. Dividend Smoothing, Agency Costs, and Information Asymmetry: Lessons from the Dividend Policies of Private Firms. 15. Michael S. Rozeff , Growth, Beta and Agency Costs as Determinants of Dividend Payout Ratios, Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 249-259, Fall 1982. 16. Smith, A. (1990). Corporate ownership structure and performance. The case of Management Buyouts. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, pp.143-164. 17. Henri Servaes Tobin’s Q and the gain from takeovers: The Journal of Finance • Vol. LXVI, No. 1 • March 1991. 18. Easterbrook (1984): Two Agency-Cost Explanations of Dividends. 19. The Modern Corporation and Private Property, Berle and Means. 20. Brealey & Myers on Corporate Finance: Capital Investment and Valuation , Richard A Brealey, Stewart C Myers. 21. The Black (1976) effect and cross market arbitrage in FTSE-100 index futures and options.…

    • 2496 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    CHAPTER 1 MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this chapter you will be able to: 1. Define mergers. 2. List twelve conditions required to merge. 3. Define and perform due diligence. 4. Identify information to consider before "doing a deal” 5. Describe antitrust guidelines 6. Explain M & A percent rules. 7. Plan for mergers and acquisitions. 8. Decide on acquisition terms. 9. List factors in determining a price. 10. Describe grading criteria. 11. Summarize acquisition strategy and process. 12. Finance the merger. 13. Use capital budgeting techniques for M&A analysis. 14. Explain the effect of merger on earnings per share and Market price per share. 15. Describe the risk of the acquisition. 16. Explain the methods of hostile takeover bids. 17. Outline SEC filing requirements and tax considerations 18. Enumerate defensive measures by targeted company. 19. Determine the value of a targeted company. 20. Describe accounting, reporting and disclosures for business combinations 21. Discuss the importance of corporate development officers (CDOs)—M&A teams For years, academic studies maintained mergers and acquisition (M&A) deals destroyed shareholder value. In 2006, however, businesses around the globe bought (and therefore sold) more companies for more money than ever. It was not just a year of record merger volume more than $3,800 billions - but also a merger market with unprecedented breadth, across geographies and industries. M&A transactions in the current merger cycle differ in significant ways from those of the 1990s, and…

    • 30980 Words
    • 124 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bicycle Industry

    • 13104 Words
    • 53 Pages

    Uncertainty in the Movie Industry: Does Star Power Reduce the Terror of the Box O±ce?¤ Arthur De Vany Department of Economics Institute for Mathematical Behavioral Sciences University of California Irvine, CA 92697 USA W. David Walls School of Economics and Finance The University of Hong Kong Pokfulam Road Hong Kong Abstract Everyone knows that the movie business is risky.…

    • 13104 Words
    • 53 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Eckbo, B. E., 1983, “Horizontal Mergers, Collusion, and Stockholder Wealth,” Journal of Financial Economics, 11, 241-273.…

    • 3577 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Even though mergers and acquisitions (M&A) have been an important element of corporate strategy all over the globe for several decades, research on M&As has not been able to provide conclusive evidence on whether they enhance efficiency or destroy wealth. There is thus an ongoing global debate on the effects of M&As on firms. Mergers and acquisitions have become common in India today. However, very little appears to be known about the long-term post-merger performance of firms in India, and the strategic factors that affect this performance. The analysis is carried out on financial data pertaining to 10 pairs of merged firms. These mergers took place in the period 2005. The performance of mergers has been gauged by analysing the financial ratios of the companies for three years pre and post merger. It is found that the merged firms demonstrate improvement in long-term financial performance after controlling for pre-merger performance. There has been efficient utilization of assets after the merger has taken place resulting in improvement in the financial ratios under analysis. For the takeover, it is…

    • 13652 Words
    • 55 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cimb Bank

    • 4600 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Merger and acquisition activity results in overall benefits to shareholders when the consolidated post-merger firm is more valuable than the simple sum of the two separate pre-merger firms. The primary cause of this gain in value is supposed to be the performance improvement following the merger. The research for post-merger performance gains has focused on improvements in any one of the following areas such as efficiency improvements, increased market power, or heightened diversification.…

    • 4600 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays