Do Standardized Tests Show An Accurate View Of Students Ability?
In addition standardized tests are unreliable they also cost too much money for students to take. For students to get into college, they have to take standardized tests like the ACT and SAT. To take these tests it can cost up to sixty dollars. However, most students have to take these tests more than once to get a passing score. Velasco states, “some students take the test once, but most need to take the test twice or even three times” (Velasco). Having to pay sixty dollars to take standardized tests can become very expensive for students and their families. Not only do students have to pay a lot of money for standardized tests, so do the states. According to Ujifusa “standardized tests cost states 1.7 billion dollars a year” (Ujifusa). The
…show more content…
states have to pay for all the standardized tests that are taken in grade levels K-12. Instead of paying so much money on standardized tests states can use the money to benefit teachers and students. Chingos argues that “teacher salaries could be increased by one percent or pupil-teacher ratios could be reduced by 0.1 students” (Chingos). Strauss emphasizes that money spent on standardized tests could be used for school repairments and better technologies for students to use (Strauss). Billions of dollars are being spent on standardized tests, which are unreliable and does not accurately show how smart students are and should not be required for students to take.
Opponents would argue that standardized tests are accurate and should be required to take to get in college, because it measures the academically ability of students.
“Do Standardized Tests Show an Accurate View of Students’ Abilities?” states “standardized testing provides them with a valuable outlet to set themselves apart from their high school” (Do Standardized Tests Show an Accurate View of Students’ Abilities). He is expressing that the test given by teachers in school do not accurately show the intelligence of students. Only standardized tests can do that. Churchill states “objective information on school and student performance, and the best available evidence comes from standardized tests” (Churchill). However, standardized tests are not accurate and should not be required to take get in college. The tests just shows how fast people can answer questions in a certain amount of time. Lee argues that standardized tests do not measure intelligence that it measures how well a student can sit and take a test in a strict time period (Lee). Hudlow argues that standardized tests do not included business, arts, theology, engineering and music, but students can be strong in these subjects (Hudlow). Standardized tests should not be required to take due to it not measuring students intelligence. Tait explains “the problem of measuring intelligence is that it is an inadequate guide to human capability” (Tait). He expresses that exam results do not determine success in life (Tait). Students intelligence level can not be determine by standardized
tests.
states have to pay for all the standardized tests that are taken in grade levels K-12. Instead of paying so much money on standardized tests states can use the money to benefit teachers and students. Chingos argues that “teacher salaries could be increased by one percent or pupil-teacher ratios could be reduced by 0.1 students” (Chingos). Strauss emphasizes that money spent on standardized tests could be used for school repairments and better technologies for students to use (Strauss). Billions of dollars are being spent on standardized tests, which are unreliable and does not accurately show how smart students are and should not be required for students to take.
Opponents would argue that standardized tests are accurate and should be required to take to get in college, because it measures the academically ability of students.
“Do Standardized Tests Show an Accurate View of Students’ Abilities?” states “standardized testing provides them with a valuable outlet to set themselves apart from their high school” (Do Standardized Tests Show an Accurate View of Students’ Abilities). He is expressing that the test given by teachers in school do not accurately show the intelligence of students. Only standardized tests can do that. Churchill states “objective information on school and student performance, and the best available evidence comes from standardized tests” (Churchill). However, standardized tests are not accurate and should not be required to take get in college. The tests just shows how fast people can answer questions in a certain amount of time. Lee argues that standardized tests do not measure intelligence that it measures how well a student can sit and take a test in a strict time period (Lee). Hudlow argues that standardized tests do not included business, arts, theology, engineering and music, but students can be strong in these subjects (Hudlow). Standardized tests should not be required to take due to it not measuring students intelligence. Tait explains “the problem of measuring intelligence is that it is an inadequate guide to human capability” (Tait). He expresses that exam results do not determine success in life (Tait). Students intelligence level can not be determine by standardized
tests.