Although the world includes so many food choices, locavores believe they get more nutrition by eating locally, which is not factual. Furthermore, as Source A claims that “locally grown produce is fresher,” Source B Marion Nestle from …show more content…
According to Source A the answer is yes, Jennifer the author states that”Eating local is better for the air quality and pollution than eating organic,”but what Source A fails to mention is the negative affects of eating locally. Source C provides the other side of affects, it states that we should “ Take a closer look at water usage, fertilizer types, processing methods and packaging techniques and you discover that factors other than shipping far outweigh the energy it takes to transport food.” Source C implies that many locavore consumers won't have as much knowledge on how the produce was actually made because of lack of information compared to the labels at supermarkets and does not differentiate an environmental difference.For an example,whether you travel for a long distance to pick up pears or go a short distance you are still consuming energy. The major factor to point out is not the “food per mile,” but that energy is being consumed and the lack of information. Therefore concluding locavores don't produce less energy that benefits our environment, it's equivalent to buying supermarket food, we are still consuming energy, a non renewable