Feminism Vs Locavorism

While this is true, it would be more beneficial to the environment, and to animals, if Americans at least attempted to consume more locally grown foods and substantially decrease unnecessary food trade.
After reviewing all three combinations, it is clear how well they can all be combined into one ideology. Locavorism goes against the industrialized way that America makes food and encourages the humane treatment of animals, along with the decreased consumption of meat. Feminism says that locavorism should be everywhere for everyone, including all women, so everyone can be healthy. Likewise, feminism calls for treating animals equally and thusly not supporting the sexist ideas pertaining to women. Locavorism assists the feminist ideals by empowering women and encouraging them to be
If they buy from local farms owned by women, they do this even more and by helping provide livelihood for women who may be victims of sexism in rural areas. On top of this, they support women by treating animals, especially female animals, with respect and appreciation. This reflects positively upon the women in American society by showing that meat is not a necessary part of any diet, and animals, as well as women, are neither subservient nor deserving of harm. People who eat vegan, local food while supporting women also help the United States move forwards socially and economically by refusing meat, industrialized food, and sexism. Halting the cycle of pursuing profit through immoral actions, they allow the United States to progress with new ways to make and consume food that do not cause irreparable harm to the environment and the world. Finally, they support minorities and people in poverty by allowing them to have greater access to food and opportunities that they would not have had with the usual American food production and consumption