Preview

Factory Farmed Food Is Wrong

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
506 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Factory Farmed Food Is Wrong
Each philosopher has a different view on whether or not it is wrong for Americans to go into a grocery store and buy factory farmed food because, that would mean we are supporting an industry that puts profits first in line instead of the animals rights like causing them harm.
Americans are not wrong for buying factory farmed food. Factory farmed food is not wrong because, if buying factory farmed food is what certain people like it is not wrong for them to buy it, other people can not judge people on what they like to eat. However if you think buying factory farmed food is wrong than you have probably already done something about it and is a vegan. For all factory farms to be shut down everyone would have to go vegan and not eat meat from these factory farms or they would have to be made illegal if they were doing something wrong in the laws eyes.
…show more content…
Singer states that “If we are not willing to inflict that degree of pain on a newborn baby, then it is morally wrong to inflict an equivalent degree of pain on a nonhuman animal”(Class notes, Module 07, Pg 7). Singer means that if we would not slap a baby why slap a animal and so on. So why do something to an animal if we would not do it to a human. Singer also makes another good point, “that we ought not to cause nonhuman animals to suffer if we would balk about causing humans that same degree of suffering if instituted, would force us to make radical changes changes in our diets, in our use of animals for experimentation and so forth”(Class notes, Module 07, Pg 7). Singer's point shows that if we did stop buying factory farmed food, Americans that do eat the food would have to make a completely different change in their appetite like going

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Goodman explains that living and working on a farm is a different way to live and think. Surely, farmers are often being judged for the idea of taking animals’ lives. “It’s not indulging in sadism, nor for power over an animal, nor an image of something hardcore to impress the neighbors” (Goodman 246). Goodman explains that killing animals such as chickens is only for the purpose of the food on the contrary of making them suffer. In fact, as everyone else, farmers do not especially enjoy killing animals but think it is emotional and ethical. Likewise, the author describes it as “being connected to the very foundations of self sufficiency, and understanding that meat does not simply fall from the sky” (Goodman 246). In reality, a lot of people don’t know or even think about the whole process of feeding themselves; which starts from the killing of those animals up until their meat ends up on a shelf at the supermarket.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our gustatory pleasure is not as important as the lives of animals. The example used in the article to explain this argument was the “Torturing Puppies” argument. Anyone who has compassion and emotions would agree that saving the lives of the puppies is the right thing to do, as opposed to killing them just for a momentary, gustatory experience. This is the same with the meat farms and consumers. Many animals such as chickens are ripped off of their beaks. Baby cows are put in cages to make their meat tender by not allowing their bones and muscles to grow. Pig’s tails are cut off and are subject to enclosed spaces. The living conditions of these animals are poor. Hormones are being injected into animals, negatively affecting the consumer’s overall health. All of this torture, just to kill these animals for gustatory pleasure, seems just as bad as the puppy example mentioned…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout history, human beings have grouped themselves together in communities. The concept of communities offered two major benefits; first, defense against enemies that might threaten the community. And second, the ability to sustain a constant food source to subsist on year-round. The need for a constant food supply became a major factor in early farming practices (Pollan, 2006) through animal husbandry. The waste from the livestock was used as fertilizer for the other crops that were raised on the farm. These crops were utilized to feed the farmers, sell at market, as well as feed the livestock through the next winter. In this manner, there is a continuous lifecycle on the homestead. The overall mindset is different, first, I will feed my family, second try to make a profit, and third, I will try to keep livestock for the next year in order to grow my farm. When the production of beef became more about profit the respect and love for the land fell catastrophically to the wayside. Modern feedlot operations are creating environmental problems that will affect our country in the future, as well as health issues for consumers, which would to corrected by implementing strong regulations in the handling of feedlot waste and a mandated correction in the diet of the cattle.…

    • 2210 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I will write my essay on Factory Farming. I chose this topic because I believe that the…

    • 149 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author tries to go against what the author of the book says. He doesn’t believe animals should have moral consideration. He talks about doing research in order to refute what the author had to say. He then asks himself if they do have moral consideration then why are we still eating them. He goes on and talks about the difference in pain between human and animal.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the years, it seems as if the agricultural industry has been more focused on the quantity, more than quality. As a society, we have been manipulated by companies into thinking we are eating all natural ingredients. Before companies started serving our foods with chemicals, authentic food came from animals that were free to roam on pastures and that were freshly cut and packaged. Now the food comes from a factory farm, which is when animals are treated as if they were machines designed only to produce. Factory farming has a negative impact on animals, human health and the environment. As consumers, we should be in control of what we want in our food; and to do so, we should cut down on how much we buy from the markets.…

    • 1990 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Peter Singer Argument

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He states that non-human animals are farmed for food, experimented on, and we as humans fail to acknowledge the suffering that these animals go through, because we are too caught up in our own ‘selfish’ behavior. Overall, his main point is that from a moral standpoint, humans should reconsider our modern practices, and give all sentient non-human animals equal consideration. He suggests that we all adopt vegetarian diets, and only conduct experiments on non-human animals when it would do less harm than good. (205)…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    No one likes to suffer. None of us like to feel pain, but factory farmed animals such as cows, pigs, and chickens experience great pain in their short-lived lives. The website factoryfarming.com, states, “a standard beef slaughter house kills 250 cattle every hour.” The method used is “stunning” this is done by using a catapult gun and giving the cows a mechanical blow to the head. It is to render them unconscious, but this procedure is terribly imprecise: “as a result, conscious animals are often hung upside down, kicking and struggling, while a slaughterhouse worker makes another attempt to render them unconscious. Eventually the animals will be ‘stuck’ in the throat with a knife, and blood will gush from their bodies whether or not they are conscious” (factoryfarming.com). An animal has an intrinsic value, and to dismiss that, is morally wrong. How do we kill others that value their life? People may say it’s the cow’s…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phil. outline

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    B. Singer then turns to the substantive issue of “what are the implications of utilitarianism for our treatment of animals?”…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Singer’s article criticizes factory farms for industrializing their farming practices and sacrificing good animal husbandry practices for increases in production. Singer indicates the ridiculous amount of animals affected by factory farm mistreatment by stating “[t]he use and abuse of animals raised for food far exceeds, in sheer numbers of animals affected, any other kind of mistreatment” (“Down on” 19). Singer evaluates the reasoning behind factory farmer’s unethical practices, and concludes that “farming is competitive and the methods adopted are those that cut costs and increase production” (“Down on” 20). By cutting costs and increasing production rates factory farming industry workers accumulate more wealth, and consumers are able consume more meat then physically necessary. One can evaluate this luxury the “Principle of Disproportionality” which states that “[a]ctions that meet nonbasic or luxury needs of humans are prohibited when they aggress against the basic needs of animals” (Sterba…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It gives basic moral significance to things that are able to experience pain and pleasure. Human’s and non humans can most certainly experience pain and pleasure therefore we all deserve equality. Singer argues that we have a direct duty to animals, to include their interest in our moral reasoning. Whether or not animals can author treatises on mathematics they like us feel pain and we therefore have an obligation not to cause them needless suffering. Singer denounces all forms of what he calls “speciesism” whereby human beings believe they can exploit animals merely because they do not belong to the species homo sapiens. Just because animals aren’t homo sapiens doesn’t mean they are not equal. They have hearts, they pump blood, they breathe and they create life, these are all qualities us humans…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Factory farming is a topic that has been debated for a while. Factory Farming is a serious matter, it should be stopped. Factory farming is basically animals being put in small cells. They are only alive to be used for food. The welfare of these animals is poor; they are abused and fed drugs.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To begin with, why should we make animals suffer before killing them? In the article “A Change of Heart about Animals” Jeremy Rifkin states “And for the thousands of animals subjected each year to painful laboratory experiments? Or the millions of domestic animals…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Factory Farming

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Animal rights are practically non-existent in many different ways today. Factory farming is probably the worst thing they can do to the poor helpless animals. Factory farming effects chickens, cows, pigs, and many other animals that are used for food, milk and eggs. One of the biggest organizations against factory farming is called Compassion Over Killing (COK). They go to great lengths to protest and inform people about animal cruelty.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Feminism Vs Locavorism

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages

    If they buy from local farms owned by women, they do this even more and by helping provide livelihood for women who may be victims of sexism in rural areas. On top of this, they support women by treating animals, especially female animals, with respect and appreciation. This reflects positively upon the women in American society by showing that meat is not a necessary part of any diet, and animals, as well as women, are neither subservient nor deserving of harm. People who eat vegan, local food while supporting women also help the United States move forwards socially and economically by refusing meat, industrialized food, and sexism. Halting the cycle of pursuing profit through immoral actions, they allow the United States to progress with new ways to make and consume food that do not cause irreparable harm to the environment and the world. Finally, they support minorities and people in poverty by allowing them to have greater access to food and opportunities that they would not have had with the usual American food production and consumption…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays