They are in great need, without military resolve, and at their worst, prone to angry restiveness and outright disobedient. That statement I did not agree with. Egyptians are not demonized as horrible because they rescued Moses, and heed warnings about the plagues. To me that is not enough evidence. Pharaoh received six announcements that warned him of what is to come. The two plagues that killed all sorts of livestock, and boils that afflicted humans were evidence that the Lord’s claim was true. I like how cox wrote this statement he wrote, “Avoidance of sin, humble obedience, and fear of the Lord are in a package that Pharaoh did not open[…]”. The plagues mainly focus on the Lord and Pharaoh, but if readers were to take one glimpse about the inner workings of Moses then it would contribute to understanding Pharaoh. Egyptians estimate Pharaoh as a strong great king. Exodus throws Pharaoh in the role of a vassal repelling against his sovereign. “Since “father: and “son” are terms used in treaties to speak of the overlord and his heir or the overlord and favored vassal, references to Israel as Yahweh’s son further contribute to casting Pharaoh in the diminished role of rebel.” Cox proceeds in his article about Pharaoh’s hardening heart and starts talking about some…