Preview

Eisenhower's Decision To Relieve Major General Fredenhall Of Command

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1899 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Eisenhower's Decision To Relieve Major General Fredenhall Of Command
General Eisenhower's decision to relieve Major General Fredenhall of command was delayed due to his inability to act on inferences from his observations based on egocentrism. While serving as the Supreme Allied Commander, a newly confident Eisenhower applied critical thinking skills by clarifying his concerns over the potential cancellation of Operation Anvil. Though he conceded ground on the issue, he understood the implications of the decision and was able to maintain focus on Operation Overlord.
General Eisenhower did not follow his own guidance to promptly remove those that demonstrated they were unfit for command when he failed to relieve MG Fredenhall. He inferred that Fredenhall was unfit to command, but he did not act in a timely manner to remove him from command. Gerras describes an inference as "an intellectual act in which we conclude something based on a perception as to how the facts and evidence of a situation fit together." Eisenhower visited the II Corps command post of February 13, 1943 and personally observed several indicators that Fredenhall was not prepared for the challenges that lie ahead. The II Corps Headquarters was located in a large underground bunker
…show more content…
The timetable provided the opportunity to "monitor implementation" and the data acquired from that timetable allowed him to "begin again" if the situation warranted. The 30,000 troop increase was a quantifiable decision and the implementation of which constituted the end of the cycle of discussions to determine the requirements for the defeat of Al Qaeda and the disruption of the Taliban. The ambiguity of the "July 2011 'transfer of forces out of Afghanistan'" comment from the President was a deliberate measure to separate the decision of the current troop increase with a later analysis focused on force

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Assignment 1 Bus 518

    • 1260 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Example two is his handling of the staff that was being sent from the supporting units. He found that the units where not sending their best staff and instead was sending the least motivated troops. “Either because they were not convinced that the evacuation was a crucial mission or simply because they did not want to detract from their ongoing operations by spending energy on it.” (Laufer) He was disappointed in what he found so he devised a plan to get the personnel he needed. First he instructed his team leaders to identify those least suitable for the mission, second he asked all of the feeder units for highly qualified troops which was met with resistance and lastly he went to his superior and advised him that “Without the personal involvement and commitment to the mission on the part of the commanders of the dispatching units, we…

    • 1260 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Commander’s intent represents a unifying idea that allows decentralized execution within centralized, overarching guidance.” This intent insures a clear purpose for an operation and an expected end state. The first challenge that Eisenhower encountered with planning for this operation was the planning staff itself. These planners, inexperienced at this type of operation, had difficulty from the beginning, because most of the decision makers were still preoccupied with ongoing operations and geographically dispersed. As a result, Eisenhower gave no consideration to their first effort, nor did either he or Alexander provide “effective leadership during this critical stage... Instead, due to indecisiveness by Eisenhower and inattentiveness by Alexander, a frustrated Montgomery tasked his staff to develop their own plans for Husky. This became the norm and as a result the functional commanders – air, land, sea components – developed their own objectives and planning without closely coordinating their actions. Considering this invasion was a compromise between allied partners, it “left commanders in the field with an imperfect understanding of the ultimate purpose of the operation.” Thus, no…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eisenhower clarified the concern that Fredendall did not add value in commanding II Corps. In clarifying the concern, a critical thinker must ensure that the problem or issue is not framed in a way that limits courses of action. However, Eisenhower’s lack of experience in high command is demonstrated by his hesitation to relieve Fredendall of command of II Corps. His judgment in this matter would later lead to the British having a negative point of view of the United States’ performance in its first significant effort at war.…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History DBQ Outline

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Doc I: Washington’s responsibility to give Kimmel its estimate of strategic effort. – The fact that the officials did not do so, lead to the attack.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    General Billy Mitchell

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages

    His increased distaste for the leaders that he felt allowed the loss of our battleship led to a statement that ultimately got him court-martialed. Rather than take the abuse of his…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another of Eisenhower’s noted accomplishments was on June 6, 1944. His decision “Okay, let's go” won admiration from Allied leaders and troops when he decided to launch the D-Day invasion on the beaches of Normandy (Life Before the…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    decisions soldiers had to make in the army. We see this decision take place in the historical…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    adding more knowledge and understanding of the changing situations. Without the education that Petraeus brought to the current conflict that we are in things could have gone a lot different because he had a higher understanding of counterinsurgency and was willing to spend the time to train and implement this understanding to others shows that he truly grasp the bigger pitcher. He is willing to change with the time and ever-changing theater. "he said in 2008 about the war in Iraq. "an Iraq that is at peace with itself, at peace with its neighbors, that has a government that is representative of and responsive to it citizens and is a contributing member of the global community could arguably be called victory"…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Camp Divided Analysis

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In one example during the Tarmiyah operation, Col Pasquarette planned an operation for a couple of weeks and then briefed Lt Col Saad and his commander on it. After the briefing Col Pasquarrette was not open to inputs from the Iraqi side on how to execute the operation. The problem was the Iraqis should have been invited at the start to help plan it. Lt Col Payne failed because he did not understand Col Pasquarrette’s goals of the operations. Col Pasquarrette did not want violence of the Iraqi method. The other example is Col Pasquarrette alienated the Iraqis when he put up the barriers between the two camps. If Lt Col Payne would have understood his objectives, he could have briefed Lt Col Saad the reasons behind the barrier. The one thing to alleviate the situation between the two parties was what Col Pasquarrette accomplished after the Lt Col Payne got relieved. He brought the MiTT team together, cleared the air, explained his position, and listened to their grievances. If this happened sooner, a better environment would have…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    C200 Exam

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. In President Obama’s speech at West Point, he announced that 30,000 additional troops would be sent to Afghanistan. He made this decision because he said it was vital to the United States’ national interest. The vital national interest at risk in President Obama’s address is the security and safety of the American people as well as the “security of our allies and the common security of the world.” By involving the military and increasing the troop strength, President Obama can achieve the objectives of his strategy. His objectives are to keep the Taliban from becoming powerful, prevent them from government rule, improve Afghanistan security forces and government so they can manage their own country and prevent Al Qaeda from establishing refuge in other countries. If you follow the framework of several important U.S. documents, such as the National Defense Strategy (NDS) and Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) they will outline this same strategy. The National Defense Strategy states that it is the responsibility of the military to protect ourselves and our allies from attack. It states that the military should help protect and secure our vital interests abroad. U.S. security is linked with the security of the international community. The physical integrity of our country is protected by the military through multiple security controls. One of these security controls is through deployments of the armed forces. The Quadrennial Defense Review states the mission of the U.S. military is to protect the American people and advance our nation’s interests. The vital interests of the United States are intertwined with the integrity and resilience of allies abroad. Our vital interests are security, prosperity, broad respect for universal values and an international order that promotes cooperation among our allies. The President’s vision is to become more powerful domestically while bringing together all elements of national power. We need to help our neighbors…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Pearl Harbor Speech, President Roosevelt gives examples of why we mustn't ponder the situation at had for very long. He says:…

    • 577 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In just two months, Marshall promoted Eisenhower to the chief of the War Plans Division where he received his second general’s star. In June 1942, Marshall sent him to England on a special mission to build cooperation among the Allies as Commanding General, U.S. Army, European Theater.(Eisenhower Presidential Library and Museum) It is remarkable to think this guy was just spotted by General Marshall and in just 2 quick months he would be promoted to Chief of war plans. This really goes to show how good he was at his job that he was promoted so quickly while being admired by his peers. Starting in November 1942, Eisenhower headed Operation Torch, the cooperated Allied invasion of North Africa. He then coordinated the land and/or water capable attack of Sicily and the Italian terrain in 1943 that prompted to the fall of Rome in June 1944. Eisenhower was selected leader of the Allied Expeditionary Force in December of that year and given the obligation of initiating the arranged Allied invasion of Nazi-run Europe. On D-Day (June 6, 1944), more than 150,000 Allied strengths crossed the English Channel and raged the shorelines of Normandy; the intrusion prompted to the freedom of Paris on August 25 and handed the hold of the war over Europe conclusively in the Allied course. Having ascended from Lieutenant colonel in the Philippines to incomparable authority of the successful strengths in Europe in just five years, Eisenhower returned home to a legend's welcome in 1945 to fill in as head of staff of the U.S. Armed force.(Smith) A quote from Eisenhower that I really like because it can be related to many aspects of life is,“In preparing for battle I have always found that plans are useless. But planning is indispensable.(Eisenhower "National Defense Executive Reserve Conference").” This shows how hard of a hard worker…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated Bibliography

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Lane, S. “Withdrawal from Afghanistan to start within months” The World Today, April 17, 2012…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eisenhower

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “How far do you agree that Eisenhower showed good judgement in his handling of the question of Vietnam?”…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The presentation of literary reviews by Sinclaire Morris gave many informative insights on how important literary reviews are and how to make one. The main questions brought up by Sinclaire Morris is if literary reviews are beneficial for people and if they are necessary. With what is going on around the world I believe literary reviews are more important now than ever before. Luckily Sinclaire Morris was knowledgeable enough and did extensive enough research to inform me on the importance of such an overlooked subject.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays