Preview

Electoral College Fair Research Paper

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1283 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Electoral College Fair Research Paper
Melissa Douglas
April 17, 2013

Is The Electoral College Fair?

The Electoral College has been a topic of discussion ever since the election of 2000. When you rely on this system, there could easily be a different outcome in the electoral vote and the popular vote. With the Electoral College in place, some of Americans’ votes are basically worthless. When the Electoral College was put into place it was a solution to a problem of the 1780’s, now in the 21st century, all Americans should have a voice. Although some people feel the Electoral College is just, the Electoral College is an unfair and outdated way of picking a President; the popular vote is the best way to elect a President in the best interest for the public. The Electoral
…show more content…
But the method that the United States uses to elect its president violates this principle by making sure that some peoples votes count more than others. If the 538 Electoral College votes were split up equally among the population (309,000,000/ 538) then every votes would represent 574,000 people. But this is not what happens because the Electoral College only gives votes to states, not people. For example, there are 11.5 million people in Ohio so to be fair they should get 20 votes. But the Electoral College doesn’t give Ohio 20 votes. It gives them eighteen. Where did those other two votes go? Those votes go to states like Rhode Island. Rhode Island has 1.1 million people in it, so it should have about 2 votes, but instead it gets four. Why? According to the rules of the Electoral College, every state, no matter how many people live there, each get three votes to start with, then the votes are redistributed. Because of this, a lot of states that don’t have that many citizens, and should only have one or two votes, now have three or four. This makes votes in some states count more than others. For example, Alaska is a very small state but has 3 electoral votes, making the weight of their vote 2.5. North Carolina however, who gave up two of their votes to make sure one of the smaller states had at least three, has 15 Electoral College votes, making each vote weighted at 0.91 of a vote. A Vermonters vote, according …show more content…
In the last two months of the 2008 Presidential Election, only eighteen states received even a single visit from a candidate. Just two of those states have very small populations. So the Electoral College doesn’t make candidates care about small states (Mackay). The Electoral College makes the campaigning for the Presidency very focused on just a few states. These are called “battleground states”. The outcome of the elections in these states could decide the entire race. Because of the way this method pans out, there is “virtually no campaign” in states that already have an obvious winner like “Kerry with Massachusetts and Rhode Island, and Bush with Texas and Utah” in the 2004 election

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The electoral college is a system of voting that is completely based on the different populations of each state. This system is not based on the size of the of the state but how many people are in each state. The states with larger populations get more electoral votes and the states with smaller population get less electoral votes. The electoral collage should be changed to fit modern day populations.…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A definite benefit of the Electoral College has been the squelching of other parties, which in turn has helped to maintain the two-party system and Congress. The minimizing of these other parties also proves beneficial since many times they would draw radical political lines that would be very divisive and could give greater power to smaller groups. Yet another advantage of the system is that it forces candidates to extend their campaigning to all states, not just the major metropolises and population centers. It could also be said that the Electoral College distributes the power to the states, and forces candidates to consider the concerns of more than just the lobbyists and those in political prominence.…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When citizens vote and cast their ballot for the candidate that they believe will be fit for president, they are not voting directly for their favored candidate. Instead of a direct popular election, the United States has the Electoral College, a group of elected electors who represent a certain states votes. The Electoral College was established by the constitution to protect minority interests and reduce the possibility of a regional candidate. However, some believe that the advantages of a direct popular vote election, such as its consideration of democratic values, outweigh the disadvantages. While others believe that the Electoral College has been put in place to hinder regional candidates not allow it to happen.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Under our admittedly complex and convoluted system, a single vote for president in the state of Wyoming, for instance, counts for more than a single vote in California. Tiny Wyoming has an inflated number of electoral votes -- three-- because every state is awarded a minimum of three. California, with a population of over fofty times as large as Wyoming, has only a little more than eight times as many electoral votes. This means that a vote in Wyoming counts about three times more than a vote in California” (Bates,…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College, established by the founding fathers in the United States Constitution, is a process whereby a body of electors chosen by voters in each state cast a formal vote to elect the president and vice president. Among many other things established within the Constitution, the Electoral College requires extensive reform. The Constitution itself was merely a framework for the United States government and did not take into account the extent to which society would change between 1787 and 2015. Amidst the several problems constituted by the Electoral College, the four most threatening complications consist of the possibility for the loser of the popular vote to win the electoral vote, the inequality among the distribution of votes according to population, the exclusion of third party victors, and the consequences that arise in case of a tie.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since a state receives the same number of electoral votes regardless of voter turnout, there is no incentive for a state to encourage voter participation (Kimberling 14). In addition, politicians do not have to devote as much attention to certain states. States such as California and New York are usually considered "safe" for a certain party and receive less campaigning effort than swing states ("Electoral Reform").…

    • 2120 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Is The Electoral College A Fair And Equitable Way To Elect The President Of The United States?…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Proponents for the Electoral College to remain the same argue that the Electoral College contributes to the cohesiveness of the country by requiring a distribution of popular support to be elected president, enhances the status of minority interests, contributes to the political stability of the country by encouraging a two-party system, and maintains a federal system of government and representation. They argue it contributes to the unification of the country because without the Electoral College system, the most populous states would hold all the power in selecting the president and the small states would not matter. With the Electoral College, every state matters in selecting the president. The Electoral College also enhances the status of minority interests. Candidates know that because minorities tend to concentrate in areas with a large number of votes, the minority can make the difference between receiving all the votes from that state, and receiving none of the votes from that state. In continuation, The Electoral College contributes to the political stability of the…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first problem with the Electoral College is that the presidential candidates only pay attention to the states…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College always has it’s print on the elections and more importantly on the very close elections. It has done it’s job the over 200 plus years and throughout fifty presidential elections. So the electoral college is promising and durable. Both parties Republican and Democrat candidate feel at times as if they win the popular vote they win the election, but that’s when the electoral votes play their part. The electoral votes are combined by states…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The electoral college in america should be abolished because it has major flaws, supports political inequality, and doesn’t support third party candidates. On top of the flaws that already exist in the electoral college the biggest flaws is what happens when there is a tie. In the case of a tie the decision of who gets to be president is cast in the House of Representatives. This would mean that every states essentially has one vote making “the single representative from Wyoming, representing 500,000 voters, [the same] as the 55 representatives from California, who represent 35 million voters”(Document F). This is important because if you just look at the numbers say Wyoming is the smallest states with 500,00 then any state with more voters that excess amount of voters basically don’t get a vote. In this case 34.5 million voters don’t get a vote. In addition to this example of political inequality, political inequality is seen in the number of electors each state receives. One example of this would be how a candidate could win the electoral vote by winning only 11 states, completely ignoring the Northeast United States(Document A). As a result of candidates only needing 11 states, bigger states have more influence than small states with only 3 votes making them less important. Yet even though 11 states have more influence than the others they really should have more because the electoral vote doesn’t truly represent population. For instance, in Illinois there are about 12 million people and they have 20 electors. Whereas in 12 smaller…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Founding Fathers created the Electoral College for reasons that are no longer relevant in the election process. The Founding Fathers created the Electoral college to prevent the direct election of the President and to make sure the President-elect is qualified. Electors used to be seen as “free from any sinister bias” (Hamilton), but are now chosen by their political parties and expected to vote accordingly, regardless of their own opinion. Many laws, that have limited or prevented direct democracy, have been changed, so why shouldn’t the electoral college be…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every four years, millions of people across the United States cast their vote to decide the next president, but most do not realize just how little their vote means. In fact, the president is not elected by the people, but instead by 538 members of the electoral college. The electoral college should be replaced by a popular vote system because it will allow all votes to be equal, cause candidates to focus on more than just swing states, and result in a rightful winner that creates a more united country.…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Document #2 shows a graph that represents the number of electoral votes based off the population. It is shown that the more people there are in a state, the more electoral votes the state receives. This does not mean that votes in a larger state count for more, in fact that is incorrect. Document #4 explains the how many voters are represented by each electoral vote. It is proven that smaller populated states are given more power towards the election and their votes. This is because there are less electoral votes, allowing their vote to count for a greater percentage. It is unfair to someone who can not afford to live in a certain place that allows more voting powers. Votes should not be based on population but should simply be counted for every person. It would surprisingly be easier to count the votes for every person instead of having to count the votes and translating them into electoral votes based on districts. Electoral votes give less power to the people and it can be unfair because even though a president elect may have the majority vote, they may not become president if they do not have the most electoral votes. This is unreasonable because if the majority of voters choose a certain president elect, that person should become president. The Electoral College is inefficient to the voters living in the United…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They can’t just win a majority of individual votes; they have to win a majority of votes in a majority of states (or, at least, a majority of large states). This helps legitimize the election” (Arguments in favor of the Electoral College). The electoral college forces candidates to win the majority in the majority of the states. This makes presidential elections much more accurate. For example, in 1968 President Bill Clinton and President Richard Nixon both had tied with a 43 percent plurality of the popular vote. Although this happened, the electoral college helped in determining the winner of the election. Without the electoral college, elections would be a complete…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays