English Bill Of Rights Essay

The English Bill of Rights was formed in 1689, and almost a century later in 1787, the U.S. Constitution was designed. As a result, many of the same ideas are adapted from the English Bill of Rights and transferred to the Constitution. There are many similarities between the two documents, but even though they have many commonalities, they also have several differences. For each document it is clearly seen that each point conforms to each country. The similarities between the Constitution and the Bill of Rights are extremely vast. The first example is that both list out accusations against their leaders. For the Bill of Rights it was King James II, and in the Constitution, it was King George III. James II, who was known as a tyrant due to
The first large change is the quartering of soldiers. In the U.S. Constitution, it states there are to be no quartering of soldiers, without consent of the homeowners. On the contrary, the English Bill of Rights stated that the quartering of soldiers was necessary. This began during the reign of Oliver Cromwell and James II, but thankfully now this rule has been changed and matches that of the Constitution. Next is the drastic difference between the laws on firearms. Our Constitution provides us with our second amendment, and it allows us a great deal of firearm freedom. The English Bill of Rights, however requires all English citizens to possess a certificate for each gun they own; and even have restrictions on which guns the citizens are allowed to own. The two documents greatly differ, in regards to freedom of speech. In the Bill of Rights, members of Parliament are granted permission to freely speak their mind. But it does not permit any member of the general public, to freely speak their thoughts. On the other hand, the Constitution provides all citizens with the freedom to speak their mind publicly. Lastly, there is one piece in the Bill of Rights that the U.S. Constitution does not even discuss. In the United States, treason was never truly an issue, but in England it was a different story. Within the Bill of Rights the king is allowed to transfer the property or