Preview

English Colonial Settlements: The Struggle Between Native Americans And Indian Nations

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
840 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
English Colonial Settlements: The Struggle Between Native Americans And Indian Nations
Land represents a quintessential issue between Native Americans and Europeans. This has been true since Columbus’ discovery and the era of Spanish exploration, invasion, and settlement. During the latter periods of Native American history we observe how English colonization and then the birth and growth of the United States affects the Indian Nations. During this period we mark how two divergent societies value land differently and the disparities resulting in conflict and Indian subjugation.
The English Colonial Settlements initially viewed the land similarly as the aboriginal Indian inhabitants in a particular way. The land was the provider of sustenance to both. The early English Colonies sought refuge in the land, which was unlike the
…show more content…
At first there was an aggressive unfettered Indian land grab and then ongoing assaults on natural resources residing on the ever-dwindling Indian lands. The stereotypes of American Indians as inferior beings with limited intellect, or bloodthirsty warriors, or lacking acceptable morals initially justified Colonial expansionism under pretense of ordained religiosity. Indian resistance to relentless encroachment was often confronted with rebellion and the question of sovereignty was debated. The establishment of the United States and the subsequent 1823 Supreme Court ruling of Johnson v. McIntosh made clear the government accepted that early Europeans had rights to all Indian lands by having discovered the lands. Having previously defeated the British and securing American independence allowed the victor’s title be transferred to the United States. It is from this point that “Conquest by Law” guides the history of land possession between Native Americans and …show more content…
The national conquest gained a legal endorsement to empower government separate Indian Nations from their land as assured in 1831 by the Supreme Court’s Cherokee Nation v. Georgia ruling that minimized Indian sovereignty to that of being a dominated people at best classified as dependents of their United States government guardian.
In 1832 the Worcester v. Georgia ruling held that the aforementioned Cherokee treaties and the Trade and Intercourse Acts passed since 1790 did recognize Indian Nations as political entities with authority within its borders. It now excluded States from having any jurisdictional power over Indian Nations. Though this ruling established Indians as autonomous from States it put in motion what would later become Congressional plenary power and it marks the beginning of federally exercised relocation to feed American land hunger and later efforts to manage “the Indian

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When English colonists first arrived to the New World, the Native American Indians were curious yet kind to these “white men”. However, as time passed the colonists’ hunger for more land grew stronger. They began to take advantage of the Indians by signing treaties that were not completely understood by the natives. Consequently, a brave Indian took upon the initiative to protect their properties. Tecumseh, leader of the Shawnee, began his quest to put a stop to American greed by uniting the molested tribes to defend their lands.…

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the time that the Spanish reached the New World in 1492, European powers, and later on American, consistently tried to quash the native people, one way or another. Throughout the 1800s, and especially during the Gilded Age, the federal government’s attempts to confine the Native Americans to certain areas were largely ineffective. This was the case because the Plains Indians, along with other tribes, rejected the idea of formal authority and defined territory. This caused friction between the Natives and the government, leading to what would later on be known as the Plains Wars. Ultimately, the Plains Indians were defeated, due to the federal government’s willingness to deploy military force, the settlement of Indian lands by homesteaders and railroads, and especially the destruction of the buffalo upon which the Indian way of life depended.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is however surprising, when you know and understand the treatment of the Native Americans by the government of the United States, to recognize that both the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution of the United States contain clauses that recognize Indian peoples as foreign powers and as such the dealing of these nations must adhere to policies put forth in both (Jaimes, p141). Following these influential documents, with yet another powerful…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Changes in the Land

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages

    3. Did the Indians have a concept of land ownership? If so, what was it? What did it mean to own the land for an Indian?…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the late 1780’s the US began urging the Cherokees to stop hunting and their traditional ways of life and to instead learn about how to live, farm, and worship like Christian Americans. Despite everything the white people in Georgia and other southern states that abutted the Cherokee Nation refused to accept the Cherokee people as social equals and urged their political representatives to take the Cherokees land. The purchase of the Louisiana Territory from France in 1803 gave Thomas Jefferson the chance to relocate the eastern tribes beyond the Mississippi River.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shoshone Human Rights

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Fishel’s statement illustrates the ongoing attempt of the United States to encroach on Indian lands, especially the Shoshones in order to take advantage of the bountiful land that these Natives own. This proves as an example of the ongoing settler colonialism of the United States despite of its stated adherence to human rights and equality among its citizens. Its actions toward the Shoshone demonstrates…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Indian Removal Policy

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Land disputes and law jurisdiction cases had begun to appear quite frequently in the United States Supreme Court during the time the Indian Policy was put into effect after the war. Congress had to address the situation so they came up with the Indian Policy. It was concluded that, “discovery also gave the discoverer the exclusive right to extinguish Indian title either by purchase or by conquest. Natives were recognized only as temporary occupants of the land, and not as owners (Learn NC). The decision to move the Cherokee Indians to lands west of the Mississippi River, decided by the Jackson administration, was more of a reformulation of the national policy that had been in effect since the 1790’s.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Marshall Trilogy

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the State of Georgia, it was against the State law to preach without a license. Mr. Worcester was arrested and confined in jail were he sued the State of Georgia appealing that Georgia did not have power to inforce activity on Tribal lands. Marshalls Court agreed with Mr. Worcester affirming that the Cherokee Nation is a distinctive community on its own territory and that Georgia could inforce this State law. Again, this decision recognized that the United States Government, not the states have authority over tribes with inherent…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marshall arrived to the conclusion that the Cherokees were not a “foreign state” under the meaning of this Constitution because “foreign states” is a general term used in the American Constitution. Also the Indians are not foreign to the United States and cannot comprehend the Indian tribes with the word. The significance of the “domestic dependent nation” status with regard to constitutional rights of the Cherokee Nation is that the tribes can occupy a territory to which they declare an independent will, “which must take effect in point of possession when their right of possession ceases”.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The United States recognized Indiana tribes as separate nations of people entitled to their own lands that could only be obtained from…

    • 3248 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    M’Intosh. The court ruled that Native Americans had a basic right to live on their tribal lands. However, the court decided that these lands were really the property of the U.S. government. The state of Georgia tried to put an end to Cherokee tribal government.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Finally, during the mid-nineteenth century, the United States government created reservations for Native Americans. These zones, however, were often undesired land with few resources available. Occasionally reservation treaties would even be broken if resources were discovered on Native’s lands. These injustices led to Native American revolts and several Native American wars. These were fought in the second half of the nineteenth century but, “by the 1880s Native American resistance was basically over, and the tribes were confined to reservations.”…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In May 1830 Congress passed the Indian Removal Act, this approved that the President Andrew Jackson could remove all Native Americans from their land and to arrange settlements of evacuation with every single Indian tribe living east of the Mississippi. After the Indian Removal act was established Georgia, surveyors and squatter entered Cherokee lands, instantly focusing on the Cherokee tribe, they chose to battle back in government court. The Cherokee country brought a suit against the condition of Georgia in the US Supreme Court, Chief Justice Marshall said the case needed purview since the Cherokees were not US residents or a free country. This expressing all Indians are not genuinely American subjects. Following in the following year a…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Forced Federalism

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The book also demonstrates that long-term solutions to threatening rich Indian discrimination does not arise from matching the lobbying and political behavior of other U.S. citizens, instead the strength comes from within the indigenous nations to protect their sacred homeland and keeping their cultural and political forms of authority. During the era of forced federalism, the nations were obligated to deal with states as equals, which weakened the exclusive and historic relationship with the federal government. The…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the start of the seventeenth century, Native Americans greeted European settlers with much excitement. They regarded settlers as strange, but were interested to learn about the new tools and weapons Europeans brought with them. The native people were more than accommodating to the settlers, but as time passed, Europeans took advantage of their generosity. “Once these newcomers disembarked and began to feel their way across the continent, they forever altered the course and pace of native development.” Native Americans and Europeans faced many conflicts due to their vast differences in language, religion and culture. European settlers’ inability to understand and respect Native Americans lead to many struggles that would eventually erupt into violent warfare.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays