Preview

Epicurus Vs Freud

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
773 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Epicurus Vs Freud
For Epicurus behavior in pursuit of pleasure assured to an upright life. Epicurus says that the highest good of human living is happiness. However, he identifies happiness with the pursuit of pleasure. Pleasure is the highest good, and anything else that is good, will be rated by how much pleasure it can bring to that person. Us humans can tell pleasure and pain apart as if we are telling apart hot water from cold water. However, we should not only try and look for pleasure, and we should not try to always avoid pain. Epicurus also distinguishes between physical and mental pleasures and pains. To attain a state of perfect mental peacefulness, a person needs to avoid anxiety. Pleasure often arises from the satisfaction of a desire and pain from …show more content…

When these needs are not met, the result is a state of anxiety or tension. Sometimes referred to as the pleasure – pain principle, this motivating force helps drive behavior but it also wants instant satisfaction. As you might imagine, some needs simply cannot be met in the moment we feel them. If we satisfied our every whim whenever we felt hunger or thirst, we might find ourselves behaving in ways that are not appropriate for the given moment. I think that Epicurus and Freud have similar views on what pleasure is and what is unpleasurable. They both believe that the key to happiness and pleasure is, getting the highest good, or things that will make us feel good in that moment. For example, if you are hungry then you would eat, therefore you have met your pleasure goal by feeding yourself, or if someone is thirsty and they drink water, they have satisfied themselves by hydrating. I would also say that both Epicurus and Freud also believe that love is the center of satisfaction. We are satisfied by loving others and by being …show more content…

I personally do not feel like there is anything more basic or important than pleasure that we strive for. Everything that we do is based around pleasure. For example, I am attending college right now so that I can graduate with a good degree, and be able to live a happy and successful life. I know that if I can accomplish this goal then I will reach a high level of pleasure. No one wants to feel pain or unpleasure. If I am hungry then I will eat to satisfy my needs, I would not just sit in hunger as my stomach hurts and makes loud noises. That is in my opinion the opposite of pleasure, which is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Which Hellenistic philosophy taught that we should strive for “pleasure,” defined as the absence of pain? –Epicureanism…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Epicurus seems to believe that the idea that ataraxia/ happiness can be achieved if one is able to lessen pain as much as possible, on the other hand, Epictetus believes that ataraxia/happiness can only be reached by having a strong mind and if one is indifferent to external events that are beyond one's control. Epictetus's ethical theory seems to be a little influenced by his belief in god and more about his stoicism, while Epicurus, though he does not deny the existence of God, his theory is less influenced by divinity. Epicurus’s theory maintains that people should try to minimize one’s own desires and pains. Also, for someone to reach the highest form of pleasure, it is important to have a positive attitude toward the future and death.…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    conscience and values to make a moral decision, it provides him or her with an equation. If I…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freud and Tillich

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages

    S. Freud’s The Future Illusion and P. Tillich’s Religion as a Dimension in Man’s Spiritual Life carry on about an important question of what religion really is, what is its meaning in a cultural, psychological and scientific aspect and how it relates to a society and an individual. In this paper I will try to prove through an analysis and comparison of both texts that although their approach to the subject is different they both regard religion as an important aspect of human life. Freud in Illusion touches on things that to some may be an unquestionable truths; a meaning of life, a reason to be a good citizen - a good human being. Freud strips religion of its “holiness” but not of its power over a culture and a human life. He argues that religion in its essence is nothing more than an illusion - a wishful thinking based on a subconscious hope for a reward (the afterlife). According to Freud, religion is an aspect of culture - civilization, defending us against nature and each other. Civilization is a necessity that was socially constructed in order to explain and control the unknown and scary forces of the world but more importantly to cage our primal desires of: incest, murder, cannibalism which lay deeply in our unconscious. Therefore, to save humanity civilization created laws. At first the forces of nature were given human characteristics to make the assimilation easier and simpler to comprehend. The so called totemism was clear and understandable serving a purpose of control and protection from the environment and ourselves. But who would obey the laws if there was no fear of punishment for doing wrong and a reward for doing good. That is when religion came in handy.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    module 19

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Pleasure principle - the way in which the id seeks immediate gratification of a biological drive…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Suffering and Epicurus

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Epicurus was a hedonist, a materialist and a consequentialist who strongly believed that in order to attain the good life one must live a pleasant existence free of worry and pain. Through reflection of the concepts in Epicurus’s Letter to Menoeceus this paper will discuss Epicurus’s argument of why ‘death means nothing to us’ (Epicurus 1998a, p.49). In other words, the concept that one should not fear death, which he held to be a state of fear bringing only pain to one’s life. In addition, the notion of applying these concepts for ethical purposes on how one should live their life will be explained. In conclusion, this paper will provide a compelling argument of the reasons why Epicurus’s ideas on being fearless of death did indeed contribute to the alleviation of pain and helped with the pursuit of happiness or ataraxia (peace of mind).…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the Callicles portion of Plato's Gorgias, something was agreed upon by Socrates and Callicles during an investigative conversation that is just not true. Around 499a, the two men agree in passing that he who feels enjoyment is good, and he who feels pain is bad. These assertions are explained by saying that good men feel enjoyment because good things are present within them, while bad men feel pain because of bad things present in them. This is simply not accurate. Enjoyment and pain are things that are felt as a result of outside events; they themselves provide no insight into a person's character.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    For J.S. Mill, decreasing pain and increasing pleasure is good. However, not all pleasure is the same. Mill argues that intellectual pleasures are superior to bodily pleasures (Mill, Utilitarianism, Chapter 2).…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Epicurus says that Pleasure is what we pursue and, what we come back to, but for him pleasure stems from lack of pain. He believed that a life on moderation brought the most pleasure that over indulgence was unhealthy and brought pain. The simple things in life bring the most pleasure. He believed that mental pain was worse the physical pain. He explained mental pain a disturbance of the mind. He urged prudence in our pursuit of pleasures, and that all other virtues spring from it.…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    trolley problem

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I believe the theory which makes most sense is Jeremy Bentham’s theory of the hedonic calculus. However due to many decisions and actions having to be made in a matter of seconds, I can’t see it being practical in everyday life. The process of the hedonic calculus can take a matter of hours let alone minuets, and by following the process step-by step the decision that had to be made may have already passed. In relation to John mills theory of maximum pleasure and minimal pain, I strongly disagree that this is the correct answer for many ethical situations. Everyone’s pleasures are different and individual, for you to make a decision this can become a hindrance as it’s hard to define how to receive the maximum happiness from every individual. Using this theory in just a situation when it’s just your happiness involved however is a simple process, as you will know your preferences and what makes you happy. However when using this theory in a situation with more than one person it becomes a very complicated situation.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    EPICURUS TO MENOECEUS

    • 914 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Epicurus in his letter to Menoeceus backers the necessity of freedom from prejudice, superstition and extremes of emotions in the pursuit of happiness and a tranquil life. The apparent simplicity of this formula allowed detractors to misinterpret Epicurus, depicting him as depraved, hedonistic, anarchistic and atheistic. His aim is to present to us, how to live a happy life. He sees happiness as the fundamental principle of the good life. This paper is an attempt to critically delineate the essential tenets of Epicureanism as articulated in his letter to Menoeceus, and finally to criticize and evaluate in order to arrive at a dependable conclusion. In what follows, it would be apt to briefly consider the personality or Epicurus, before delving into the main work.…

    • 914 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Odyssey

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The overarching question of whether or not physical pleasure is enough arises very frequently not only in…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Oedipus and Freud

    • 735 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I strongly agree with Dr. Freud’s analysis of this play because we all as humans share a group of feelings, emotions and passions that drive our everyday behavior. We have been modeled with a certain scheme according to what it is acceptable in the culture where we have been raised. Those schemes deeply interact with our will in an everyday basis, and we react according to what is “correct” or what the “reason” tell us to do, we can call this the conscious level according to Dr. Freud. But on the other hand in some sort of situations or moments, according to what Dr. Freud called the unconscious level, we are capable of free our most deep emotions and feelings leaving aside the reason, and acting in a very primitive way. In both cases, these schemes are a predictable behavior or reaction that could be found and several times reproduced in different cultures with different structures. This is a never ending fight between reason and feelings.…

    • 735 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of Sigmund Freud’s most prominent claims that he makes in Civilization and its Discontents is that the laws that make up society are what holds man back from what man truly desires, and that if not for the superego, man would break those laws. Based on Plato’s recording of the dialogue in the Crito, Socrates would completely disagree with this claim. According to Socrates, laws are what allow the state to exist, and the state exists to serve its people, therefore any person living within the state should want to follow the law, as it would only benefit them. These are the core values which Socrates has lived his life by, and in Freudian terms, this simply means Socrates’ superego has been effective in mitigating the drive of the id. In Socrates’ case, the instance of the superego dominating the id is a consistent one; so consistent that I’m forced to question any presence of the id at all. If the id creates a desire to kill, fornicate, and indulge while the superego serves as a reminder to follow the law and do what’s right, but the superego always prevails, then there is no evidence to support any presence of an id. Socrates shows no signs of heeding to primitive desires such as breaking the law. While the two may not agree regarding the impact that laws have on their people, they both acknowledge that there is a general sense of responsibility to follow the laws that all humans should feel. How they perceive this responsibility is where the two philosophers differ.…

    • 1726 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my view ultimate enjoyment lies where desire meets satisfaction. One must be completely satisfied for what he was in that moment, to enjoy his life. So I completely disagree the above statement.…

    • 323 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays