Preview

Epistemology and Truth

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3441 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Epistemology and Truth
Epistemology How do we know what we know? Is what we believe to be truth really truth? A branch of Philosophy that seeks out to answer these questions and to discover the origin of knowledge is Epistemology. Much of what we believe is based on allegations and generalizations rather than established evidence. That’s way so many people have different beliefs throughout the world. I will be discussing more of these Worldviews in a later paragraph. Right now I’d like to continue to focus on Epistemology, which is the study of knowledge: how we obtain knowledge and how we justify it. These are some of the questions Epistemology attempts to answer: What is mind?; What is knowing?; What is true? Empiricism is a theory of knowledge that claims knowledge occurs from evidence collected via sense experience. It relies solely on experiences and evidence, especially of the senses, as the only source of knowledge. This theory differs from rationalism which relies upon reason and can incorporate innate knowledge. Rationalism is a method "in which the criterion of the truth is not sensory but intellectual and deductive" (Bourke 263). Empiricism stresses using scientific data discovered from experiments that is directly related to evidence. It is an essential role of the scientific method that all theories must be tested against observations. John Locke, George Berkeley, and David Hume are classical representatives of empiricism. This doctrine has problems within it though. For example: what about people who are color-blind? How they perceive the world is much different from a person who can see color. Every single person has different perceptions and in essence, has their own truth. Also this doctrine limits what you can say you know. If I haven’t had a personal experience touching, smelling, or tasting a banana, then how can I attest to knowing what a banana is? One last point I’d like to make concerning problems with Empiricism is that it creates


Cited: Anissimov, Michael, What is Logical Positivism?, 07 October 2010, Online. http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-logical-positivism.htm Bourke, Vernon J. (1962), "Rationalism", p. 263 in Runes (1962). Dilts, Robert, The Article of the Month, Santa Cruz, CA, 1998, Online. http://www.nlpu.com/Articles/artic20.htm Hasker, William, Metaphysics: Constructing a World View, Downers Grove, Il: InterVarsity Press, 1983. Print. Lowery, Mark, How to Point Out Seven Self-Refuting Secularist Propositions, Online. http://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=678 Rick, Lewis, Beyond Physics, Philosophy Now Magazine, Oct./Nov. 2010. Online. http://www.philosophynow.org/issue81/81lewis.htm Stevenson, C.L., Ethics and Language, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1944. Print. Wood, W. Jay, Epistemology: Becoming Intellectually Virtuous. Downers Grove, Il: InterVarsity Press, 1998. Print. Zacharias, Ravi, Jesus Among Other Gods, Nashville, TN: W Publishing Group, February 8, 2002. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Epistemology Phil/201 Quiz

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages

    | __________________ combined rationalism and empiricism, showing how both played a role in our understanding…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume’s version of empiricism begins with his distinction between analytic propositions “relationship of ideas,” which he considers to be a priori and true by definition, and synthetic propositions, which he considers to be a posteriori (“matters of fact”), and which are opposite of analytic propositions because they’re derived from our senses.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    From dates back to the early 1200's to the mid 1650's, Empiricists were all about experiments. Robert Bacon, and Early Empiricist, believed that experience is superior to argument (which could come from long accepted theories), and that experience science is a valid route to truth, making observation key to science. Priestley says in his article, "That this was not the case, I attribute to the force of prejudice, which, unkown to ourselves, biasses not only our judgments, properly so called, but even the perceptions of our senses: for we may take a maxim so strongly for granted, that the plainest evidence of sense will not intirely change, and often hardly modify our persuasions; and the more ingenious a man is, the more effectually he is entangled in his errors; his ingenuity only helping him to deceive himself, by evading the force of truth." He's stating that many people overlook simple observations and facts (or truths) because they believe in theories and biasses. He believes that an ingenious man is deceiving himself by distancing himself from the…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Empiricists believe that there are no synthetic a priori truths because they believe that sense experience is our only source of knowledge of the external world.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Empiricism denies this. It claims that all a priori knowledge is only of analytic propositions.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    PSYCH 102 Chapter Outline

    • 10896 Words
    • 49 Pages

    Francis Bacon (1561–1626) & John Locke (1632–1704) formed modern empiricism: the view that knowledge originates in experience (tabula rasa) and that science should therefore rely on observation and experimentation.…

    • 10896 Words
    • 49 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ap psycho vocab

    • 3281 Words
    • 14 Pages

    2. Empiricism – the view that knowledge originates in experience and that science should, therefore, rely on observation and experimentation…

    • 3281 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Phi 208 Final Paper

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Epistemology arisen either in defense of or in opposition to certain forms of skepticism. Skepticism is an attitude of doubt and uncertainty as expressed in everyday language and an identifiable school of thought in history ideas. It’s most general sense refers to doubt, disbelief, uncertainty, suspension of judgment, and rejection of knowledge. “We might say, for example, that skepticism is the denial of the existence of any justified true belief, but only when justification is understood as a matter of reason-giving of a particular kind.” (Almeder, 2010) It is the doctrine that true knowledge in a particular area is uncertain and argues that beliefs in something does not justify that an assertion of knowledge on the particular…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke was best known as an advocate of empiricism and for his belief of tabula rasa, or the blank slate. In this way his beliefs were similar to those of the behaviorist school of thought. Locke is known as the father of English Empiricism. Empiricism believes that everyone is born with a blank slate that we fill as we experience life. The knowledge that we gain throughout life is due to our experiences, not through reasoning or thought. Locke believed that there is only the capacity to have ideas in the mind, not to be born with them. He states that all knowledge of the world comes from the experience we have within it, through our perceptions and senses. According the empiricism, every thought that we have is influenced by an experience that we have had. Essentially, according to Locke’s view and empiricism, the only way to know the truth about something is to actually experience it through our senses.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Psych

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1: Empiricism- The view that knowledge originates in experience and that science should, therefore, rely on observation and experimentation.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From a scientific realist’s perspective, the scientific pursuit of truth further gives rise to genuine knowledge of the natural world, thus entailing epistemic realism and accordingly yielding the knowledge of truth about the objective reality investigated by scientists (Sankey, 2008). Epistemic realism characterises scientific realism, insisting that scientific knowledge is not restricted to the observational level, but also unobservable aspects of reality as well. On the contrary, contemporary versions of constructive empiricist deny the possibility of having rationally justified belief or knowledge about unobservable aspects of the world (Sankey,…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Begins with observations, questions, and hypotheses. Next, researchers gather evidence, test hypotheses, and publish results. scientific debate and theories suggest new hypotheses which lead to further research…

    • 2388 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bacon's for Idols

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Francis Bacon is widely regarded as the father of empiricism. Bacon is credited for making many scientific discoveries, most notably the scientific method. He also provides us with a new tool for reasoning through The New Organon. He gives us a set of idols that he feels need to be set aside in order to discover new truths. Idols are falsely worshipped ideas that can fill our minds with incorrect thoughts. They are predispositions that create both prejudices and misconceptions. Bacon states that there are four idols that we must eliminate in order to be able to make clear decisions. The four idols are idols of: the tribe, the cave, the marketplace, and the theater.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Define empiricism and explain how empiricism is different from the doctrines of philosophy. Use examples to explain the differences.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is Certainty Possible

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What could be more obvious than the view that the senses are the only dependable source of knowledge? "Seeing is believing," as we would say. Empiricists argue that there is nothing in the mind that was not previously in the senses, the senses are the only means we have of knowing anything. Locke, an empiricist as well, argues that "senses give us a sort of alphabet of knowledge. Just as we take twenty-six simple letters and combine them in units of ever increasing complexity-words, sentences, etc. So in learning, we begin with simple impressions, which are then combined into units of increasing complexity. We can recall to mind past sensations through the power of memory, and we can combine sensations and the ideas resulting from them in fanciful ways through the power of the imagination." The only problem with this is what about things we do not personally experience? If we cannot appeal to our present sense impressions, or summon past impressions from our memory, how do we extend our knowledge of things? This is where Hume comes in. He points out that the principle of cause and effect is the link that ties our present experience of the world to other possible experiences of the world both past and future. We can assume that the sun will rise everyday because we have seen it rise everyday. However the problem with this is that we cannot be certain that the sun will rise everyday. Cause and…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics