Eric Schwitsbebel's Analysis

Eric Schwitsbebel’sargument in the beginning of the paper talks about not remembering the name of his roommate but also still being able to say some information about him. Which means that although he is not fully correct on the information he still does know some things. This goes with his example of the teacher and explaining prime number. He says that it is logical to think that one is a prime number but that it is not and it could bring some confusion to the students when they ask about it. So instead of confusing the kids and them thinking it is a prime she should specify in the beginning that every other number that are prime, except one. Although she may believe that one is a prime this would not say that she believes in it nor that
she does not, it simply follow the rules of what has been stated to be found. This is how someone would go about to their in between beliefs. This does make sense to state because although you may not fully believe in something, you can strongly agree with it. So when stating your opinion about it you cannot say that it is false nor that it is fully true so you have to find an intermediate that you believe both of the arguments may be true. But this also leaves to question which concept you believe in, can someone hold two opposing thoughts about a certain topic? If they do, which one is ultimately true at the end? The concept of in between believing is something that does make sense when hearing about it but it also brings confusion as to which side of the argument could be true.