He argues that one acts the way they do in a situation is because of the way you are, he continues by saying that to be fully morally responsible for what one does then you must be fully responsible for the way you are. One cannot be fully responsible for the way they are because one has no choice of their gene pool or their upbringing. He goes on by saying that one knows that they are how they are, and that one has a certain mental nature that now one is able to be fully responsible for having a certain nature. One must have has a certain nature that brought about the second nature. For one to be fully and only truly responsible for how they are they must be responsible for having the first nature that brought out the second nature. Strawson says that one purposefully had to have had the second nature, but in order to bring about the second nature one must have already existed with a nature that existed before the second
He argues that one acts the way they do in a situation is because of the way you are, he continues by saying that to be fully morally responsible for what one does then you must be fully responsible for the way you are. One cannot be fully responsible for the way they are because one has no choice of their gene pool or their upbringing. He goes on by saying that one knows that they are how they are, and that one has a certain mental nature that now one is able to be fully responsible for having a certain nature. One must have has a certain nature that brought about the second nature. For one to be fully and only truly responsible for how they are they must be responsible for having the first nature that brought out the second nature. Strawson says that one purposefully had to have had the second nature, but in order to bring about the second nature one must have already existed with a nature that existed before the second