Essay On Gun Control Policy
Gun control has gotten way out of hand, the United States have been changing the firearm policy for over a century now. The very first push to change the Firearm policy was in the 1930’s from the Roosevelt administration which resulted two new laws. There was also a second attempt to make changes again to the firearm policy. John and Robert Kennedy, and Martin Luther King were assassinated which resulted a huge conflict on the Firearm Policy, their deaths proceeded the Gun Control Act of 1968. The act was too weak, the people had the Firearms Protection Act of 1986 on their side which concluded the Gun Control Act of 1986 to not work. The Clinton administration came into office and created the Brady Act, there were background checks on people
…show more content…
People with the possession of a firearm that have a dangerous background should be restricted from firearms, guns should be only used to the people that are in danger. The whole issue is about the possession of any type of gun, people are getting back ground checked, and people are not allowed to have a guns as well depending on their back ground. Overall the whole issue is that I agree that people need to be checked before purchasing a firearm. Its common sense people wouldn’t want a crazy person in possession of a firearm, u never know when the person is going to explode and start shooting insist people. Many Americans assume that people with dangerous backgrounds shouldn’t have a firearm, I agree that people who are bad shouldn’t they chose to that path and they have to live with their mistakes. The only people that should be carrying a firearm are the police officers, these people took an oath to protect the people in their city. Of course some might object that firearms are not for just police officers. Although I concede that yes it may be true that people can have their own firearm to protect themselves in any danger, I still maintain that there is no need to carry a firearm because the police officers will protect the people. On the one hand, people will disagree on my suggestion that only police officers should carry a firearm. On the other hand,
People with the possession of a firearm that have a dangerous background should be restricted from firearms, guns should be only used to the people that are in danger. The whole issue is about the possession of any type of gun, people are getting back ground checked, and people are not allowed to have a guns as well depending on their back ground. Overall the whole issue is that I agree that people need to be checked before purchasing a firearm. Its common sense people wouldn’t want a crazy person in possession of a firearm, u never know when the person is going to explode and start shooting insist people. Many Americans assume that people with dangerous backgrounds shouldn’t have a firearm, I agree that people who are bad shouldn’t they chose to that path and they have to live with their mistakes. The only people that should be carrying a firearm are the police officers, these people took an oath to protect the people in their city. Of course some might object that firearms are not for just police officers. Although I concede that yes it may be true that people can have their own firearm to protect themselves in any danger, I still maintain that there is no need to carry a firearm because the police officers will protect the people. On the one hand, people will disagree on my suggestion that only police officers should carry a firearm. On the other hand,