Preview

Ethical Issues With Organ Donation

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
229 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethical Issues With Organ Donation
As aforementioned, there are unceasing debates on ethical issues and dilemma from organ procurement to organ allocation. Robson et al. (2010) defined organ transplant as "transfer of a living tissue or organ to an injured or ill person to restore health or reduce disability". The organ procurement can be obtained from living donor or deceased donor. According to Robson et al. (2010), donors who adopted living donation are more willing to donor their organs to their families, relatives or friends. They may even opt to donate their organs to strangers in turn of rewards. Is this ethical to trade organ? Will this imply that rich person has better advantage to get new organ over the poor? Is this fair to poor person? The public attitude toward

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The first paper appoints the issue of not legalizing the payment of donating organs. The National Kidney Foundation does not believe that the payment for organ donating will increase donations. The foundation wants to remain committed to helping people with donations. They believe that if it is legalized then disadvantaged citizens would take advantage of this opportunity that should only be done for the great feeling of it, and not the money. Sally Satel believes that organ trafficking should be stopped by legalizing some type of donor rewards. Satel believes that if legalized then people would give more kidneys or any other organ to help people on the waiting list. She also believes that certain incentives should be given and not just straight cash. Some of those incentives are; income tax credit, tuition vouchers for ones children, and a contribution to a retirement fund that would not be able to be touched until a certain age.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The ability to keep someone alive by replacing one of their major organs is an amazing achievement of this century of medicine. Unfortunately, the current supply of transplant organs is much lower than that need or demand for them, which means that many people in the United States die every year for lack of a replacement organ. When a person gets sick because one of his or her organs is failing, an organ is damaged because of a disease or its treatment, or lastly because the organ has been damaged in an accident a doctor needs to assess whether the person is medically eligible for a transplant or not. If the person is eligible the doctor refers the patient in need of an organ to a local transplant center. If the patient turns out to be a transplant candidate a donor organ then must be found. There are two sources of donor organs. The first source is to remove the organs from a recently deceased person, which are called cadaveric organs (Potzgar, 2007). A person becomes a cadaveric organ donor by indicating that they would like to be an organ donor when they die. This decision can be expressed either on a driver’s license or in a health care directive, which in some states are legally binding contracts. The second source is from a living…

    • 2294 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compensating donors for organ donations is one of the most controversial debates we have today. The shortage of organ donations in America is the one of the main reason there is a sudden drive to supplement the possible sources of organs. It first began with the move from donations of organs from cadaver to donations from living donors, and no the debate is rerisen, to the possibility of building a market for organ donations with a financial incentive.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Alexander T. Tabarrok’s essay, “A Moral Solution to the Organ Shortage” Alexander explains ways to find solutions to the organ shortage by proposing a fair way to go about qualifying for organ transplant. Gary Becker suggested that paying a good amount of money toward funeral cost of organ donors would help and encourage people to donate their organs. The new rule that Alexander wanted to proposed is the “no -give - no - take” rule. Under this rule in order to receive an organ a person must have previously signed their organ donor card. Under “no - give - no take”, signing your organ donor card is like joining the club, the club of people who have agreed to share their organs. People have different views when it comes to donating organs. Some have their doubts about becoming an organ donor because of their religious beliefs, while others thinks that by signing an organ donor card it’s same as buying an insurance . NOTE In some ways I agree with Alexander on this new rule that he has proposed ( UNOS). Having a donor card is a good idea to make sure there is surplus of organs able to be donated. I’m not convinced that the “no- give no - take” rule will be productive to solve the shortage of our organ donors any time soon, since Alexander’s essay was based on suggestion. As for myself I would have doubt of donating my organs not because of my religion or beliefs, but the trust of the people that handling my organs. This essay has inspired me to rethink being an organ donor because of the problems of most organizations. In my own views, paying tremendous amounts of money to organ donors to saved someones life is a wrong way to help people that in need. As time progresses and suggestions becomes reality I would be more confident in donating my organs. NOTE…

    • 317 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics and morals relate to “right” and “wrong” conduct. While they are sometimes used interchangeably, they are different: ethics refer to rules provided by an external source, e.g., codes of conduct in workplaces or principles in religions. Morals refer to an individual’s own principles regarding right and wrong. (Ethics and Morals, 2014) Within the world, there are a lot of contemporary issue that raise ethical and moral questions. Organ donation is a debate that is continually at the forefront of consideration in Australian. Sadly, an average of 21 people die each day because the organs they require are not donated in time. This then leads to people thinking and discussing through two ethical issue that arise. First is that ‘Do I donate my organs after death to help those in need’ and the second question is that ‘Do I give consent to a relative who has…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The lack of transplantable organs has encouraged a lot of intellectuals to think of using financial incentives as a motive to facilitate organs donation. There has been recurring commentaries that appeal using market approach in the transplant community. There is an economic analysis that came up showing the effectiveness of successful of transplantation and emphasizing the imperative need for organs. However, there is a question that should be addressed; does a cost-benefit analysis ethically justify vending organs? Actually, there are a lot of social and ethical consequences that should be taken into consideration when answering this question.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    More than 123,000 people in the United States are currently on a waiting list for a transplant, and out of these people seven percent will die without ever receiving a transplant. This could change if more people donate. One person who donate can save up to eight lives with organ donation and more then hundred lives with tissue. If more people were educated on the different they could make with donating, I feel it would have a more positive outcome. Blood and Organ donation is not really discussed as much as it should. There are pros and cons to donating just as there are for everything else.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are donors selling their organ(s) to gain profits. Basically, it is the poor who could use the money and thus, selling the organ(s) to the rich. The wealthier buyers would have the upper hand and can easily secure themselves an organ. Indeed it could help save the lives of the rich but how about the poor? Not only do the lives of the rich matter, but generally the lives of all patients who are suffering do too. Priority should be given based on the severity condition of the patient on the wait list, paying attention to the suitability of the organ from the donor to the patient (eg. Blood type). Possibly, the patient’s immune system should match with the donor in order to receive the organ, else it could go wrong (KidneyLink, 2014). If the above system fails, patients might start looking for alternatives to retrieve an organ and in this case, by the back-door option. Some donors believe that they can survive with just one kidney and do not mind selling away one of theirs to either gain money or to save a life (Castillo, 2013). The black market sales of organs has gone as far as social media where some are seen looking to buy organs to help a family member or some to sell their organ(s) to live a better life. Besides this, black market sales is the faster option as compared to being on the waiting list in…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, Let's Pay For Organs

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As everyone knows, there are millions of people waiting desperately for an organ to save their life's. Now a days there are countries like Singapore that allows the commercialization of organs for a really high amount. Even though; United States prohibited the option to sell organs for money, I believe that having the option to save other people by selling an organ is a very smart idea. In "Yes, let's Pay for Organs" by Charles Krauthammer; a political columnist, writes an essay to demonstrate that maybe selling organs for a low price would and may help to our society in general.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    During this process no person should be exploited and donor should be given with all the health facilities and donor is the one who should be taken care of. In reality converse is always true. In “Organ Sales: Compromising Ethics” R Cohen (2006) argues that the laws barring organ sales are intended to protect those who, out of economic desperation, would be harmed by those with more money(p. 608). These laws were made to protect the most vulnerable member of the society, but in reality it does not seem to happen. Organ donation should be advantageous to both, the donor and the receiver. It should be done in order to save someone’s life but in today’s world it looks like it saves receiver’s life but donor has to sacrifice…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to being immoral, opponents also tend to include that it is against their religion. This is a matter of state and religious views that are separate, making this argument is void. With it being immoral, that is hard to understand because currently it is legal to sell ones sperm, blood plasma, and other body parts/functions. It is also legal to use a surrogate mother. If someone wants to sell their own organs, then they should be able to sell their own organs to save a life. Opponents think that there will be businesses that will pursue organs for donation. It will then escalate so bad that people will turn to violence to get organs from people so they can sell them. These opponents think that the government will allow a market without regulations. Of course the government will regulate this. They will have set prices, restrictions which will probably include that the organ seller must also be the organ donor so stealing someone else’s organ would be completely pointless. Another argument made against the market is the fact that the procedure is dangerous. When a donor is making the decision, they’re usually made aware of the dangers and have to sign a waiver. Same will go for those who sell. Opponents also tend to argue that transplants don’t extend a person’s life for that much longer. According to government statistics, the majority of people are still living five years after the operation. Specifically these statistics include 69.3% of kidney operations, 74.9% of the heart, 73.8% of the liver, and 54.4% of the lung. From this, one can conclude that these transplants do help significantly in prolonging one’s life. (Analyses* what does this mean?) This argument the opposition makes can be easily dismissed. (Why can these be…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Organ Donation

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It can help someone else because there are certain organs that you cannot live without, but of course it’s after the donor has passed away and is in good condition…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Every ten minutes, a person is added to the national waiting list for organ transplants. And every day, 22 people on that list die without the organ they need. These odds aren’t very promising with the thousands of people waiting for that lung or heart. What if we could just grow those organs without the need of an organ donor. Luckily, we can because scientists have created human-pig hybrids…

    • 69 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Organ Sales

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Many people are dying each day because of the lack of organs available. Waiting lists can be as long as 106,000 people. On an average 17 patients in need of transplants die each day. Is this fair to the families or is selling organs a better option?…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Transplant Surgery

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There is nothing un-ethical about where the organs come form as I said organs can come from any human. Live donors willingly consent to donating a non necessary organ to another. So obviously there is nothing wrong about taking someone 's knowing they willingly gave it to you. The transplant surgery itself is perfectly safe. Doctors conduct tests upon tests to find someone perfectly compatible for the organ receiver. Doctors test everything from blood type to tissue type to even x-rays and urine tests. They test everything to make sure the donor and receiver has little to no risk at all. As Denice Grady, a New York Times reporter stated, "Donor deaths are rare, although surgeons have estimated that the death rate for donors in the operation would be 0.5 percent to 1 percent". There is a risk of less then one percent, that is basically no risk at all. You are way more likely to die of a car crash and we still drive everyday.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays