Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Euthanasia Should Be Legalised in Australia

Good Essays
533 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Euthanasia Should Be Legalised in Australia
Voluntary euthanasia should be legalized in Australia. For years, there has been much global debate on this topic. Euthanasia is the hastening of death for a suffering, terminally ill person. Indeed, the term euthanasia quite literally means ‘good death’ in Greek. As Australians and as human beings, we should have the freedom of choice to decide a quiet death when we have no chance of life. Euthanasia is a dignified way to end the suffering of terminally ill patients.

In essence, we are autonomous people with a right to self-sufficiency, independence and to self-regulation, so why should we not have the right to choose whether or not our lives should end if there is little or no hope of recovery? Even health professionals in Australia must treat in accordance with the patient. It is hard to put your feet in the shoes of these patients. They are suffering, and quiet literally dying. If the inevitable is near-future death, why not end it now and take the emotional and physical stress off the patient and their loved ones. Some opposing the idea may say if euthanasia is allowed, it can easily be abused. Of course, the legal system must be designed to not permit the misuse of the law. Before a patient is even offered euthanasia, his or her mental stability must be considered, that is, is the patient competent enough to make a sound decision? Also financial and domestic problems of the patient must be taken into account by the board of professionals regulating euthanasia in our health system. In 2009 Newspoll discovered a huge 85% of Australians support euthanasia. 85% believe that people have the right to choose voluntary, quiet death when in immense suffering.

Secondly, euthanasia is a choice that concerns quality of life. We all have different standards regarding quality of life. For some being clinically alive is enough to mean that you should continue to live. However for others, being clinically alive is simply inadequate. Some would argue that allowing euthanasia would be allowing suicide. Euthanasia is very different to suicide. Suicide does not help a person and is used as the ‘easy way out’ of solving problems in life. Suicidal patients can be given treatment such as counseling, rehabilitation, etc. In contrast, euthanasia is when someone voluntarily dies when there is no known way to recover physical and mental health. Euthanasia is definitely not cowardly. If a person’s life is lacking in self-awareness or an intrinsic presence as a human being due to extreme physical suffering, then that person should be able to choose a dignified death rather than an undignified existence.

In conclusion, throughout this essay, the meaning of being ‘terminally ill’ has constantly been accentuated. It means to suffer. To give your loved ones great grief. To be awaiting near-future death. To be given no hope of surviving. To be dying. At the end of the day, when it concerns our lives, we should be focusing on what we want, what we believe in- not what society wants us to do. Legalise voluntary euthanasia and put the right to die in the hands of that patient where it rightfully belongs.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    To sum it all up, euthanasia should be allowed. One has the power of their life. Especially when it is causing them pain and the people around them. Having to either pay for another ill person in result to their family being ill when they are in pain can get very expensive. There are people who need the help and the money more than the people who only have a few months…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia means gentle or easy death for those who are incurably ill and in pain. So should a person have the right to take another person 's life or his own when he or she is incurably ill and in pain? That is Australia is trying to decide. The N.T already has passed a law that legalizes euthanasia in that state. Now other government leaders and members are in support of this are pushing for an Australian euthanasia law. Christian Groups and Anti-Euthanasia have seen euthanasia as a sin and a choice that no-body should make. Some doctors have taken ill patients life 's as a request from the patient should this now be openly done. Would you want to be kept alive, with little hope ahead, when you were in pain? Some might answer no, and those people should deserve the choice to end it when that pain becomes unbearable.…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Euthanasia, formally known as mercy killing, is the act of intentionally causing the painless death of a sick person, rather than allowing that person to die naturally. In terms of a physician's actions, it can be passive in that a physician plays no direct role in the death of the person or it can be active in that the physician does something directly to cause the death (Yount, 2002). Euthanasia may also be formed into three types of act, which are voluntary, involuntary, and nonvoluntary. Voluntary involves killing the patient at his or her request. Involuntary occurs when the patient does not give consent, or refuses. Nonvoluntary is where the patient is not able to make the decision about their medical treatment so it is up to a third party to make the decision for them (Yount, 2002). Legalizing euthanasia would cause many complications because we are dealing with a very controversial issue that brings into focus some extremely powerful, conflicting, and competing values. Under the Canadian Criminal Code, active voluntary euthanasia is illegal and individuals can be convicted for 14 years for murder (Ogden & Young, 2000). Passive euthanasia has been legal because the courts have recognized the right of a patient to refuse and to terminate unwanted medical treatments. The question that remains today is whether legalizing active euthanasia in Canada could either benefit or harm not only the individuals involved, but also society as a whole.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In at least some cases, active euthanasia promotes the best interest of everyone concerned and violates no one’s rights, therefore, at least in some cases, active euthanasia is morally permissible.” (RSL/Rachels, EL 249) This is the strongest argument for active euthanasia in my opinion. Those who oppose this argument may claim that euthanasia is not in the best interests of all parties involved. The parties referenced are usually the friends/family/doctors and their grief over the situation or even the hospital and its shareholders losing money from the patient. First off, any person who wants to keep a family member alive who is in extreme pain for the sole reason of wanting to prolong being able to interact with them or to offset their own period of suffering following the family member’s death is incredibly selfish. The logical conclusion would be that family and friends of the patient would be relieved by their quick and early passing because of the avoidance of a month of suffering. Yes, of course the family and friends of the patient will experience emotional trauma from the passing of their loved one, but in due time the loved one you will pass whether they like it or not. Second, when it comes to financial losses to the hospital and its shareholders, those who would put monetary gain over the wellbeing of another human being have…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    People who are terminally ill and in a lot of pain often desperately want to end there life and do it in horrifying ways. Many starve themselves to death just so that they can stop the pain. Doctors and family members are frequently being charged due to helping a patient or family member end their life. This could all be solved if euthanasia was legalised. So why hasn't it happened? Why are so many people lives being damaged? Australia is yet to legalised euthanasia due to vulnerability concerns. They are worried that people will feel as though they are a burden and will ask to end there life. Or that doctors will take advantage of there power. This can easily be solved by providing qualified, independent third parties that will check whether the request is genuinely voluntary or is feeling pressured into making the decision. If euthanasia were to be legalised it would stop many people from ending there life's in dangerous…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this presentation I’ll explain why voluntary euthanasia should be legalised in Australia when a person is suffering from a terminal illness or are already in the late stages of an illness that cannot be cured.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first person to be legally voluntarily euthanised in Australia was Bob Dent in the Northern Territory, in the year of 1996. This controversial issue has raised many dilemmas throughout society, and so far it seems there is no clear solution. The implications of euthanasia will be discussed herein. Defining the issue and exploring both sides of the controversy has proven to be a difficult task.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Euthanasia In Australia

    • 2271 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Euthanasia is defined by the Oxford Dictionary (Oxford University Press, 2013) as “the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma.” The word euthanasia originates from the Greek words, “eu” meaning good, and “thantos” meaning death, however the topic of this type of “good death” has become highly debatable in Australia. Sometimes referred to as “assisted suicide” and “mercy killing,” euthanasia gives people their own right to die through painless suicide, however done so at their own free will, making it voluntary. Once legalised in the Northern Territory for nine months under the Rights of the Terminally Ill Act 1995, euthanasia is…

    • 2271 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia In Australia

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Euthanasia is often a controversial topic around all areas of the world. The idea of ‘assisted suicide’ has sparked debates and many countries, including Australia, are still hesitant or reluctant in allowing legislation for legalising Euthanasia to pass. This inquiry will aim to provide sufficient evidence as to why and how Euthanasia should become legalised while also evaluating and examining other cases and laws in other states regarding this topic.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This argument needs to be settled so people can either go through the process or not even have the option. If patients cannot obtain euthanasia then there needs to be more ways that will ensure patients less pain and suffering for them. IN the future, hopefully the Unites States will legalize euthanasia or find a better alternative than euthanasia that will allow patients to die with dignity. People of the United States and all over the world cannot live in fear of what might be right or might be wrong, chances need to be taken to understand and develop more. To end with is a quotes from “Doctor Death, Jack Kevorkian, and “My ultimate aim is to make euthanasia a positive experience.” (Euthanasia…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doctor-Assisted Suicide

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To look at the right to die one must first question if it is compassionate to keep a person in a consistent state of suffering until they succumb to their illness? Suffering, disease, pain are all synonymous with deterioration, in this case, it’s deterioration of life itself. Euthanasia of a beloved pet is the ‘humane’ way to say goodbye in many cases due to our humanitarian obligation to preclude pain, this humanity should be extended to humans. Our society under the preconceived notion that death is a punishment that is only inflicted to those who have committed the greatest of crimes, or equally as dangerous, that death is a sort of tragedy. To protect the sanctity of life in a person whose quality of life is limited, they should be allowed to request to hasten their own death. Physician-assisted suicide does not denigrate life, it enhances…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It´s your own body, so why should you not be allowed to decide what happens with your own body? Kelly Hockley (an Australian professional woman on human rights) said: “Euthanasia is in fact a good death”. I think that you should be allowed to decide about yourself, because if you want to die like that, you can of course, because you have to decide for it. It´s almost like brushing your teeth, smoking or riding too fast. Everybody recommends you to not ride too fast, but you can decide either you do it or not. It is and it will always be your decision! I do realise that you have to think about others, but when you´re very ill and you can´t do anything anymore then it…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia, comes from the Greek word meaning “good death”, and is the practice of assisted suicide with the purpose of relieving pain and agony. The people who opt for euthanasia suffer from an incurable and painful disease or are in an irreversible coma. Euthanasia has been the subject of much moral, religious, philosophical, legal and human rights debate in Australia. At the core of this debate is how to…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The last reason that Euthanasia is wrong is because it denies the final stage of growth. During the stage of terminal illness it gives the ability to the patient to be able to reflect on there past events. They can decide whether or not they believe they have had a successful life. Also in terminal illness is gives the patient…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The topic of Euthanasia has been the subject of moral, religious, philosophical, legal and human rights debate in Australia for many years. According to the Australian Medical Association, Euthanasia is defined as ‘The act of deliberately ending the life of a patient for the purpose of ending intolerable pain and/or suffering. The great debates stems from two contradicting notions held within society: the right for individuals to choose to die with dignity when suffering and the need to uphold the moral right to life for every person. Currently, in Australia Euthanasia is illegal, however, there have been many countries that have recognised the need to allow an individual to…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays