Evolutionary Theory Vs Intelligent Design

For years on end, many have tried to explain the universe apart from the existence of an Intelligent Designer. The farther we have come in science, the more humans can see and observe. However, the evidence is by no means solidly in favor of the Darwinistic view, but in fact, the evidence strongly supports the existence of an intelligent designer. In our culture today, it would see that Darwinism and the theory of Evolution have much more influence on the general public than people who believe in an intelligent designer. When all the evidence is considered, can we legitimately shun the possibility of an intelligent designer? Despite claims that there is overwhelming evidence for a naturalistic explanation for the universe, sound science is
Every fossil that has ever been excavated has been helped document the fossil record. All fossils are the remains of living organisms that have been imbedded in sediment. The fossil record can provide a glimpse into the conditions and controversial processes of the past. The Intelligent Design theory is backed by the findings and evidence of paleontology. Charles Darwin thought that all living things were descended from one organism. He thought that as time went by, different species would evolve into others. So, if evolution were true, one would expect the fossil record to be filled with organisms that were in the “inbetween” stages(Buratovich). The fossil record should document the evolution of the species. But, there are no fossils like this that have been found. Instead, all of the fossils that have been excavated are from one species and one species only(Dembski, Wells). Darwinists try and validate their reasoning by noting the similarities between organisms. Instead of a common predecessor, could all life have a common creator? The fossil record clearly does not support the idea of evolution because the documentation of the actual species changing is not evident.(Buratovich). The evidence points rather to a common intelligent designer who created a variety of species from the beginning of time. Some scientists have tried to submit the idea of Punctuated Equilibrium. This is the idea that instead of the more popular idea that evolution is slow and steady, evolution actually happens in short spurts of time.(Dembski, Wells) This, it would seem, would bridge many of the gaps in the evolutionary fossil record. The species would evolve so fast that nature would not have time to fossilize the “inbetween” stages of the change. Still, the changes could not happen in one generation of species. Even if this theory happened to be true, there still should be some fossils