Preview

Examples Of Chapter Summary For Thank You For Arguing

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
615 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examples Of Chapter Summary For Thank You For Arguing
Thank You for Arguing, Notes
Chapter One
• By beginning with a banal-seeming example of the power of arguing, Heinrichs tries to establish a connection with his audience, most of whom, presumably, will be familiar with the kind of low-stakes, everyday arguments.
• Having established the importance of arguing and rhetoric in a banal, everyday setting, Heinrichs generalizes to say that rhetoric is an inescapable part of life.
• The thesis of the book: rhetoric is an important form of knowledge, and it’s as relevant in the 21st century as it was in ancient Roman society.
• By studying rhetoric, he further claims, people can improve their lives in countless ways, both by boosting their awareness of other people’s arguments and by improving their own argumentative strategies.
• rhetoric is indeed an inescapable part of modern
…show more content…
Chapter Two
• It’s important to distinguish between arguing and fighting—arguing is as much about avoiding conflict as it is about facing conflict head-on.
• However, if done correctly, arguing can be an invaluable tool for married couples: the right arguments, phrased in the right way, can help a couple resolve its differences in a productive way, preventing resentment or tension from building up in the marriage.
• getting pulled over. A good rhetorician may be able to get out of the ticket by recognizing that not getting ticketed and resisting the temptation to argue with the officer.
• the traffic incident could apply to almost any argument: persuaders must always decide whether they should debate a point, concede to it, or lie about it. Often, the best strategy is to concede a point and remain focused on the overall goal of the argument.
• Cicero is one of Heinrichs’s rhetorical heroes and a prominent figure throughout Thank You for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    She comes to understand that it is with our daily lives that we begin to find ourselves and realize that our words not only the text matter. One has to give their own authority and their own standpoint to make their point argumentative. Through personal life, methods of teaching and college experience does Sommers truly notice the change between her own authority and textual information. It is within us that truly makes a paper what it is. Our own authority should be our judgment. Between the drafts makes one comprehend what really happens between 2 papers. Drafts not only have to be papers but they can pertain to our own lives as well. Arguments begin with our own voices. Either the risk one takes or the risk they do not. It is with much evidence and disdain that Sommers truly presents her argument. One is lost between the words of the paper to make it seem less effective. Sommers uses effective writing techniques’ and much revision to make her thesis…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Lazere, Donald. "Chapter 13 Thinking Critically About Political Rhetoric." Reading and Writing for Civic Literacy: The Critical Citizen 's Guide to Argumentative Rhetoric. Boulder: Paradigm, 2009. 267-301. Print.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adele Douglas and J. Kenji Lopez-Alt both start their argumentative piece by defining who their argument is targeted to as well as what they will be arguing. Over the course of the two contrasting papers, they both use similar and contrasting methods to try and convince the reader of their opinion. By doing this, a number of flaws as well as good techniques can be seen in both writings.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. Tannen is a professor of linguistics at Georgetown University. Her study of language and how it is utilized has led her to have many books on the “Best-Selling” List. In her book, “The Argument Culture”, Deborah Tannen takes a closer look at how we as a society have come to view arguing/debating as a normal form of communication. Our inability to look at more than two views at a time, has led us to limit the potential conversations that could easily take place. In this essay, Professor Tannen takes a shot at making us believe that being in an “Argument-culture” is not the best thing for us as a whole. She wants us to see that it is truly a problem but that it can be fixed by following her advice. Tannen feels that everything…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetoric is the art of influence, and therefore hinders the strong social force of arguments. According to the book, Thanks for Arguing, rhetoric serves as the decoder for arguments. The art of persuasion is all around, even in arguments.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The art of rhetoric is the systematic study and intentional practice of effective symbolic expression. Effective means achieving the purposes of the symbol user, whether that purpose is persuasion, clarity, beauty, or mutual understanding.…

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Heinrichs presents the reader with Cicero’s five canons of persuasion which are invention, arrangement, style, memory, and delivery. Out of these five I believe you most importantly need to use arrangement and delivery. “Start by winning over the audience. Get them to like you through your shared values, your good sense, and your concern for their interest. Make them identify with you. All the tools of ethos apply here. Then launch into your argument, stating the facts, making your case, proving you point logically, and smacking down your opponent’s argument. End by getting the audience all charged up, through patriotism, anger—any of the emotions that lead to action.” (Heinrichs, 284). “Think about your voice—are you loud and confident enough for the room?—and gesture. Cicero included eyes (both eye contact and expression) as an aspect of gesture. A confident voice and expressions that start with the eyes: those are the chief secrets of actio.” (Heinrichs, 293). If you arrange your argument in a way that speaks your audience’s language while still getting across what you want from them, they are more likely to listen, thus more likely to act. Remember, seduce your audience with your rhetoric. The way you deliver your argument is essentially the most important part. If you have a foolproof speech but you stand in front of you audience murmuring and shaking, no one will listen. Know what you are talking about and carry that…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aristotle, although having lived thousands of years ago, continues to make an impact in our society with his contribution to Western thinking and his famous "art" of rhetoric. He remains to this day, one of the most influential philosophers in the history of rhetorical study. One of his most prominent works is his "Rhetoric", a book that "confronts scholars with several perplexing questions" (Herrick 74). "Rhetoric" is divided into three books that discuss the "domains of rhetoric, the rhetorical proofs that Aristotle is so famous for and matters of style and arrangement" (Herrick 74). One of the most important contributions of Aristotle 's "Rhetoric" is his idea of artistic proofs, which are used to persuade an audience. Since developed in the fourth century BC, these proofs still continue to be utilized by rhetoricians to this day through the Aristotelian method. There are three components that comprise the artistic proofs. These are "(1) logical reasoning (logos), (2) the names and causes of various human emotions (pathos), and (3) human character and goodness (ethos)" (Herrick 82). Although all parts of his work are instrumental to rhetoricians and scholars everywhere, I will focus on the profound impact of Aristotle 's "artistic proofs" to the art of rhetoric and use Franklin D. Roosevelt 's December 8, 1941 "Declaration of War" speech as an example of how they 're put into practice as a persuasive mechanism in today 's postmodern society.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. In order to argue effectively, the arguer must first set a personal goal, and then play an active role in setting the goals of the “audience”.…

    • 1800 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1967, Robert L. Scott started a seminal debate within the rhetoric community with his essay, “On Viewing Rhetoric as Epistemic.” His argument – rhetoric is epistemic - has been analyzed and/or criticized by many scholars. Scott himself followed up in 1976 with an article titled, “On Viewing Rhetoric as Epistemic: Ten Years Later” in order to address some of these concerns, and add to his original thoughts. Despite this follow-up, authors still continue criticize and defend his work. This essay will focus on three responses in particular, each focusing on a different aspect of Scott’s argument, in order to prove that rhetoric is in fact epistemic. First, Brumett’s, Three Meanings of Epistemic Rhetoric (1979) will examine three possible meanings…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical perspectives in the field of communication offer dynamic looks into not only the field itself, but into the civic-life aspect of this field, also called “lifeworld”. A lifeworld, according to Habermas, is all the immediate experiences, activities, and contacts that make up the world of an individual or corporate life. Specifically, Contemporary Rhetorical Theory offers a way to understand the communicative process and what the communicative process is. Contemporary Rhetoric itself is not communication - rather, it provides important aspects into understanding what communication is; rhetoric is praxis. “Praxis is when theory and action are combined…” (Farrell, 1999). Contemporary Rhetorical Theory establishes theoretical assumptions of human society and the communicative act, as well as, test those assumptions by analyzing human society through the everyday civic life. “…rhetoric derives its materials from the real conditions of civic life, the appearances of our cultural world. At the same time, this activity makes room for disputation about the meaning, implications, direction, and…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Analysis In this new age we live today a good argument requires proof, credibility, emotion and more. There are many things to do to win a crowd over or simply make them think about what they did or what they should do in a future nearby. Communicating Rhetorically is a must to give a concise argument, the speaker must plan accordingly and deliver a strong persuasive message with one of Aristotle’s core tents. Aristotle’s Logos is the best approach communicating in rhetorical situations.…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetoric is defined as the purposeful use of language by The Writer Harbrace Handbook. (Glenn Gray ed 5). Typically it is divided into three categories Pathos, Logos, and Ethos, which are appeals to emotion, reason, and authority respectively. It is essential for any argument for any issue since it is impossible to convince anyone that one’s standpoint is correct without these appeals. Typically multiple rhetorical arguments are used throughout a paper.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    tannen

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Both readings provide a great understanding of how we live in an argument culture where “us versus them” type of attitude have been so deeply engrained in how we communicate and interact with others through media and politics. The idea that opposition is seen to be the most effective way to get…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the world today, the word “argument” is used on a daily basis and usually carries a bad meaning. In fact, the word is used so much that people often mistaken it’s true meaning. According to the book Writing Arguments by John Ramage, John Bean and June Johnson, there is no universally accepted definition of “argument.” The meaning of the term is rather complex, and it has been remained a controversial issue of philosophers and rhetoricians over the centuries (2). Because of the complexity of the word, we need to examine three important points in order to understand what “argument” truly meant: the misconceptions about the meaning of argument, the features of argument, and the relationship of argument to the problem of truth.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays